03-21-2018, 08:10 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 807
|
Opinions on pulley gains
So obviously we have a well known vendor that has a 75whp kit that is a 10% lower, CAI, and handheld tune.
Since they are not nearby, I went to my local (but well known) LS shop. They quoted me a 70-80whp gain with a 26% upper (2.4"), CAI, Id1050 injectors, BAP and dyno tune. What am I missing here? Shouldn't a 26% overdrive with fuel enhancements give more than that? How are they quoting the same gains? Also, is it worth it to do the upper just to replace the spring with the solid isolator? Will this avoid future failure?
__________________
'13 ZL1
'06 TBSS '98 TJ '87 GN |
03-21-2018, 09:40 PM | #2 |
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
|
I think you answered your own question. It’s all in the tune and apparently they don’t have it. Call Ted....
|
03-21-2018, 10:08 PM | #3 |
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
I think two things are at play there...There's a lot in the tune and a 75 RWHP gain is pushing it on a 10%/Intake setup. I would EXPECT 50 RWHP from a 75 Kit but regularly see 60+ on most cars. A 2.4"/Fueling/Intake would likely benefit big time (30-40 HP+) from Headers at that point which would be your missing part IMO.
|
03-21-2018, 10:13 PM | #4 | |
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
|
|
03-22-2018, 08:24 AM | #5 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 807
|
Are you able to log with the handheld to see what your duty cycle is at?
__________________
'13 ZL1
'06 TBSS '98 TJ '87 GN |
03-22-2018, 08:38 AM | #6 |
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
|
|
03-22-2018, 09:50 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 807
|
It's hard to believe they are leaving that much on the table, because they are also well known for LS work.
What about doing the upper instead of lower, in order to install the solid isolator?
__________________
'13 ZL1
'06 TBSS '98 TJ '87 GN |
03-22-2018, 10:45 AM | #8 |
Pulleys have diminishing returns without supporting mods. Upping the boost just creates heat, heat creates detonation and requires that timing be pulled or fuel to be added to compensate. There is really no reason to go any higher than an 18% overdrive unless you are doing headers, or adding octane. At that point you need to start thinking about diminishing fuel pressure. As stated on this site many times dynos are just tuning tools and cannot really be aaccurately compated to one another. 1/4 Mile trap speed in like DAs is where you should look for gains. The shops estimate is pretty reasonable for rwhp. If they have exerience with LSAs and have a long history of quailty work you could go with then. There are plenty of good LS tuners in the country...but also some bad ones, so do your research.
__________________
2013 ZL1 CRT M6
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Current Mods: Rotofab CAI, Big Gulp, and Res. ATI Superdamper and 10" Lower, DSX FF Sensor, DSX Aux Fuel Pump, ID850s, Kooks 1 7/8" Headers, Forced Induction Interchiller, McLeod RTX Twin disk. DSX Tuned. Running on 20" MT ET Street SS on stock wheels for the strip. Best 1/4 mile to date:10.81 @130.43 mph w/ 1.61 60' Just added: Jokerz Stage II blower port and FI Interchillers blower lid spacer. |
|
03-22-2018, 11:20 AM | #9 |
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
OP, by chance are you speaking of Speed Inc?
|
03-22-2018, 11:20 AM | #10 | |
'It's an experiment'
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,694
|
Quote:
Great advice right there crazydave! -Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577 |
|
03-22-2018, 03:26 PM | #11 |
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
Speed Inc knows what they’re doing. Take it to them and don’t worry about a thing. They built my buddies ZR1 and they always give conservative numbers but their cars rip. I would definitely do Headers though.
|
03-23-2018, 07:42 AM | #12 |
Drives: 1968 Camaro, 2012 ZL1 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 398
|
I picked up 70 RWHP with a 10% lower, CAI, LT headers, injectors and a tune from a well respected local tuner. We actually picked up 75 on one run, but he backed things off a tad since it is my daily driver.
|
03-23-2018, 07:22 PM | #13 | |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 807
|
Quote:
Not sure about headers at this time, I would like a stock appearing car. Which is why I would prefer to do a lower pulley, but I keep reading about the spring loaded upper as a timebomb. Do I wait for the marbles sound and get the warranty to replace it? Or take care of it now with the solid isolator mount?
__________________
'13 ZL1
'06 TBSS '98 TJ '87 GN |
|
03-23-2018, 07:35 PM | #14 | |
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
Quote:
Headers are going to be very beneficial for HP, pressure relief, temps etc. I’d go as far as saying they are necessary at anything over 18% OD. Stock appearance shouldn’t be too bad of a problem, I mean anyone who is going to recognize headers will recognize the intake and pulley/belt that’s not OEM either. You can do the lower but it’s more expensive in parts and you won’t get to do the isolator. There’s a long warranty on the supercharger to cover specifically the isolator but I would think most dealers would tell you to walk if you’re full bolt on and asking for a free fix. |
|
|
|
|
|