03-21-2013, 09:38 AM | #71 |
The magic smoke genie....
Drives: Jewels (2010 RJT 1SS) Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,294
|
I keep telling people that doing both an intake and LT's cause the ECU to go crazy and cut power. It doesn't know what to do with all the extra flow. I've seen it several times since 2010. You can do one or the other without a tune, but a full exhaust with intake needs a tune to work right. Especially if your not running CATs.
|
03-21-2013, 09:49 AM | #72 |
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
My car ran untuned for a year with long tubes and home cold air! I had zero problems and ran .5 faster at the track. How does the car feel, if it feels faster then when it was stock something is up with the dyno pull!
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
|
03-21-2013, 12:05 PM | #73 |
Drives: 13' 1LE Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,641
|
OP, any track results or other dyno since then?
__________________
13' 1LE
Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me. |
03-21-2013, 02:42 PM | #74 |
|
Lio 2 questions. was anyone else surprised with their numbers that day. second who did you get your rear blackout from
|
03-22-2013, 11:55 AM | #75 |
Banned
Drives: 2013 CRT ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 1,545
|
These numbers are ridiculous, something definitely wrong, I haven't got to the dyno yet cause of the shit whether and lack of time but I will soon enough and I have similar mods.. I will post back to this thread when I do.... but easily expecting 410-425 to the wheels!!
|
03-22-2013, 12:55 PM | #76 | |
Airborne Recondo
Drives: Crystal Red 2SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fairfax Station Va.
Posts: 864
|
Quote:
|
|
03-22-2013, 01:12 PM | #77 |
Banned
Drives: 2013 CRT ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 1,545
|
|
03-22-2013, 01:40 PM | #78 |
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 294
|
Don't even try to compare Mustang and Dynojet results. Apples and oranges. Run it on a Dynojet if you want to see comparable results.
|
03-23-2013, 08:22 AM | #79 | |
Drives: formerly a AGM ZL1 (sold) Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
Save you some money over a brand new kit. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273146
__________________
2013 Ashen gray ZL1 M6 with Roto-fab, Vmax TB, Pfadt headers, 10% pulley, JRE tuned. 11.459 @125mph. 566hp/517tq. Sold due to not enough seat belts. FML.
|
|
03-23-2013, 11:35 AM | #80 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RS 1LE IMO Turbo Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxnard. CA
Posts: 1,747
|
Dude I'm really interested on the turbo kit.. pm me
|
03-23-2013, 09:33 PM | #81 | |
Drives: 2012 2LT/RS, 2005 SLK55 AMG Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 1,163
|
Quote:
Did you do any "before" dynos before all the mods were added? Pretty much everyone says a tune is needed but I guess the OP just doesn't want to get one. What's next? A turbo kit without tuning? |
|
03-24-2013, 02:25 AM | #82 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RS 1LE IMO Turbo Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxnard. CA
Posts: 1,747
|
Quote:
No previous synod before any of the mods... And Yes I get the point that after all those thing a dyno tune is the best shot. The only thing that I said that I was not gonna do a dyno tune right now if i was gonna put a turbo then I can dyno tune it after that....... Me doing a dyno tune at the moment. Then putting a turbo kit and having to dyno tune again is a waste of money... Is $750 to dyno tune it.. and $7000 for the turbonetics kit , installed with a dyno tune .. |
|
03-24-2013, 06:11 AM | #83 |
Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
Why not at least get a Jannetty remote tune for less than the $750 and makes sure your collection of parts aren't way off. A remote tune plus another run only dyno session is a lot cheaper than $750. Should get you some better numbers and a better running car also
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
03-25-2013, 01:26 PM | #84 |
Drives: pleather and Chiclets Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: a line somwhere
Posts: 4,206
|
750 is a lot and not for the best tuner in socal. CMS CMS CMS CMS CMS. he owns a 1LE, has been on a road course, and specd and tuned it himself with the best ls tech in socal Mike. At CMS you wont leave until they are happy...which means you will be very very happy.
I sent you a pm, others have told you about inferiority of some of the parts you choose and the computer not bein able to handle it all with stock tune.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|