10-11-2011, 11:28 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2017 ZL1 Status "Thank You!" Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 2,498
|
Not a whole lot of reason to lower this.....IMHO Im not sure I'd even appreciate the look. It's about as low as it can go without hitting the roadcoarse corner curbs as it is...
|
10-11-2011, 11:33 AM | #16 |
Bear Backer
Drives: 69 Camaro Z/28, 69 Corvette Conv Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,490
|
Sits way too high for optimum performance or visual aesthetics?
__________________
Current Chevrolets: 1969 Camaro Z/28 -- 1969 427/390 Corvette Convertible -- 1970 350/300 Corvette Convertible -- 2013 Camaro ZL1 Convertible -- CRT / Exposed CF Weave Hood Insert / Suede Package / Polished Wheels / MN6
|
10-11-2011, 11:52 AM | #17 | |
Drives: 2002 Lifted Trailblazer Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
|
10-11-2011, 08:16 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2010 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 990
|
Companies will make compatible springs with shorter rods, I did this on our CTS-V it does look awesome and the springs are stiff and the ride and cornering is excellent. I will say the OEM springs and the OEM mag ride settings are superior in terms of the cars performance. The cars compression and rebound is also better with the OEM springs.
So there will be a trade off because I do not think Mag ride in a GM likes being messed with. The only car I have ever been blown away with Mag ride is the Ferrari 458, just amazing how that system works but he GM has budgets. Looks aside i think the ZL1 will feel amazing out of the box because of the really aggressive wheel and tire set up. Maybe bigger sway bars and end links wouldn;t hurt but id almost leave the mag ride alone. |
10-11-2011, 11:00 PM | #19 |
10-Sec AWD TBSS/ ZL1 Next
Drives: Procharged 2006 Trailblazer SS AWD Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 65
|
I'd rather keep the front splitter when I clip the apex's on the track! Mine will stay stock height!
|
10-11-2011, 11:34 PM | #20 | |
Drives: 2002 Nissan Altima Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,048
|
Quote:
Here's the wheel well gap that I think is too high and detracts from the look IMO and here's what I'd consider to be the perfect ride height with minimal wheel well gap. While I love the look of lowering, I'm still not sure if I'm going to go that route. I'm going to play this one by ear and probably let others report back on their experience before I decide.
__________________
Factory Badassery
|
|
10-12-2011, 12:23 AM | #21 | |
Quit being a pu$$y
|
Quote:
In most pictures the wheel gap doesn't look bad, but then in some pics, not so much. Car looks like a 4x4 in this pic.
__________________
|
|
10-12-2011, 01:05 AM | #22 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
|
10-12-2011, 01:09 AM | #23 |
OKCamaros
Drives: 4 banger Diesel Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 4,572
|
I think the aftermarket parts for the ZL1 is gunna be pretty sufficient.
I'm pretty sure PFADT is gonna come up with something to make the ZL1 even handle better. |
10-12-2011, 07:54 AM | #24 |
Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: May 2011
Location: Southeast,
Posts: 842
|
I love the look of a lowered car but Im getting this car for handling and its track expertise. If I can lower it without affecting the handling, then I will, but I definitely wont if it will compromise the MR's capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What song are you listening to right now | Muscle Master | Off-topic Discussions | 6743 | 04-25-2024 10:35 PM |
Quotes from a Wise Man | Angrybird 12 | Off-topic Discussions | 23 | 08-29-2008 10:20 PM |