03-08-2011, 05:41 PM | #15 |
Drives: '19 Camaro 2SS, '12 GMC Yukon Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SW PA
Posts: 174
|
Talk to an automotive engineer (I have) and the will tell you that anything more than 87 octane in the V6 Camaro is a waste of money.
|
03-08-2011, 07:21 PM | #16 |
#TeamBeckyD
Drives: 2017 HBM 2SS Convertible A8 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 10,496
|
36k on the clock I have been using regular.
Sean
__________________
#TeamBeckyD
**FIFTY HBM 2SS VERT** |
03-08-2011, 07:57 PM | #17 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010, Rally Yellow, Black stripes Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,363
|
I tried 87 in my V6, and it was OK, but just didn't seem smooth enough. Went to 91, and was smooth as silk. Dropped to 89, and still smooth, with none of the hesitation I got before.
|
03-08-2011, 08:32 PM | #18 |
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,287
|
I used 91 for early on when the car was new and I had the airaid v1 intake. With that intake 91 helped with throttle response and what not but since all the mods and miles on the car since last sept its been on 87 and I dont see how I would notice an improvement now, the car runs smooth and strong. Some day I'll try 91 again and see.
|
03-08-2011, 08:42 PM | #19 |
TRI COUNTY TAMPA
Drives: 2011 1SS/RS VR/BLK A6 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Trinity, Florida
Posts: 6,277
|
Unless you only have 2 octanes available this makes no sense at all. Essentially what your trying to do is mix something like 87 and 93 to make what 90? Doesn't really work that way. You could always just fill up on 89 and call it a day IMO.
|
03-08-2011, 09:13 PM | #20 |
Account Suspended
|
I run 87..tried 97 but saw no difference, but I only have 1700mi on it.
|
03-08-2011, 09:15 PM | #21 |
Account Suspended
|
|
03-08-2011, 09:35 PM | #22 | |
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Quote:
True for most normal cars and engines, but NOT true for the 3.6 L in our Camaros. Has been proven by a few while on the dyno that using higher octane stops the engine from pulling down the timing which in turns means more HP. Glad to see we have another thread on this great debate of 87 vs. 93.
__________________
|
|
03-08-2011, 10:05 PM | #23 |
Drives: 2011 CGM 1LT RS (M6) Join Date: May 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 703
|
If i was going to the track i might put premium in but for everyday driving even if it did give a little more power it simply isnt worth it at the prices gas is at.
|
03-08-2011, 10:10 PM | #24 |
Drives: Y2000 Olds Intrigue Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 180
|
A properly maintained modern engine should not "need" 89 octane until it has about 150,000 miles on it. And even then, a good long road trip can help clear the crud out of the piston heads and you may be able to return to 87 octane for in-town driving.
|
03-08-2011, 10:19 PM | #25 |
White Lightnin
Drives: 2010 Summit White Camaro LS Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gulf Coast - Biloxi MS
Posts: 273
|
I've been using premium 93 for a while and it does make a noticable difference with the V6. However, with gas prices at this rate....regular 85 is looming in my future. This car has computer adjustments that corrects for timing, air, exhaust, gas....its very high tech. Though my v6 loves premium and responds accordingly it will have to do with regular until prices come down. I'm not building a race car...I want a show car!!! I have to be able to afford it. There is no real reason for high gas prices except, for greed.....Oil company's greed be DAMNED...your greed will be your end! Your higher prices will eventually cause people to drive less and therfore use less. Higher profit margins will not offset the decline in use and you will LOOSE! Other prices (food, water, building materials) will rise due to high delivery rates and we will have even less money to spend on gas. Its a MAD, MAD WORLD!!!
|
03-08-2011, 10:52 PM | #26 |
Drives: 2012 45th anniversary edition 'vert Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 277
|
regular gas for me
__________________
MightyGrasshopper
www.mightygrasshopper.com Into health, wellness and fitness? Check out my site for natural health product reviews, health articles and industry news. Want to get into summer time shape? I'm a former fatty who's lost the weight - "Train With Me" for FREE - sexy abs in 16 weeks! Just follow along! |
03-08-2011, 11:48 PM | #27 |
Drives: Black 2011 2LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 282
|
I tested a few tanks of regular vs premium on gas mileage, and notice a substantial difference (about 30-40mi per tank) between the two. Since then been putting premium in. Purely personal observation and I dont care what research is out there on this subject. If it's not broken, I'm not gonna try to fix it.
|
03-08-2011, 11:55 PM | #28 |
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
The manual say 87 or higher.
Its been proven 87 pull timing, if you want everything that your LLT has to offer than go 93 or equivalent. It defenitely feel better and pull better with 93. That is all I use unless someone can prove 87 does not pull timing on our 3.6 LLT. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 66 | Yesterday 11:41 AM |
PEDDERS SUCCESSFULLY FITS 305s ON ALL 4 CORNERS! | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 467 | 06-11-2013 09:45 PM |
Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 09:27 PM |
GM unveils Jay Leno Camaro, Camaro Synergy, Camaro Chroma, Camaro Dusk at SEMA | irocnroll | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 101 | 02-27-2012 12:25 PM |
AHHHH!!! Time to PANIC $5.39 gas is here!! | VTXrider | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 46 | 03-11-2011 04:13 AM |