07-05-2016, 10:38 AM | #1 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Custom kit
Please correct me if I'm wrong but...
It seems to me that if one is going to be running 5-7psi a kit should be able to be made that is realitively inexpensive. Isn't there a way to just use the current manifolds to spool the turbo and then just run a pipe from the turbo to the intake manifold? I'm probably missing something, but it isn't like a 5-7psi kit needs lots of bells and whistles. Sure that isn't a lot of boost, but I'd drop a few grand on a bare bones kit. If one doesn't come out I'm going to look up kaylee's skirt and see if one can be done. |
07-05-2016, 11:23 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Nightfall Grey Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sulphur La.
Posts: 1,680
|
This may help you understand the complexity of all Forced Induction engines.
http://modnoob.com/guide/induction |
07-05-2016, 11:27 AM | #3 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Quote:
Got some junk yard headers that came together as a nice manifold, a snail, waste gate...etc and had a kit for about a grand. Yes, I know this isn't a civic or a 90s engine. |
|
07-05-2016, 11:34 AM | #4 |
Bump in the night
Drives: '84 Monte Carlo SS, '15 Optima Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 744
|
Careful with the home-brew turbo fabing if it's your first go round. Do you know how much hp the stock shortblock will take reliably if you're boosting into the 15#+ range? It's a system, the whole engine. It's is designed to operate within a certain range of power before you start over reaching the designed capabilities of individual components. Which one will fail first? Get them all right before you lay on the boost.
__________________
|
07-05-2016, 11:35 AM | #5 |
Bump in the night
Drives: '84 Monte Carlo SS, '15 Optima Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 744
|
Sorry, your post cleared that up.
__________________
|
07-05-2016, 11:45 AM | #6 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Quote:
I've beaten them both off the line but it was very close and had I even messed up a little off the line the race would have easily gone the other way. Besides all that, I have a feeling I'm going to be running that rear mount kit and not making my own. Time will tell. |
|
07-05-2016, 06:43 PM | #7 |
Speed Freak
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
|
If you are specifically looking at turbos you have to look at the horsepower rating much more than a specific boost number. A turbo that makes 40 pounds of boost on a 2 liter engine would have to work just as hard to make 5 or 6 pounds of boost on the Camaro 6.2 liter motor. "boost" is just a measurement of the restriction to pushing the air into the motor. These LT motors are making a lot of power on just 5 pounds of boost.... 600+ horsepower worth of air moving on just 5 pounds of boost. That is a petty good flowing system. Hopping up a 2 liter 4 cylinder engine is easy, anything over 150hp worth of air is a gain..... you have got to get a serious turbo to feed this 6.2 LT that needs 450 hp worth of air without boost.... I can't see that this going to be done cheap.
Twin turbos rated 300 to 400hp each mounted directly on the exhaust manifold and sharing a common intake tube is the easiest way to get usable power. Ball bearing ceramic, titanium, small housings....all help reduce lag.... but add to the overall cost.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq
2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|