1.465 60' VIDEO from Pfadt Suspension development at RMR - Page 4 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Xtreme Innovations & Fab · 09-17-2010, 04:50 PM

This is my area of expertise and I think Phadts racing needs to bring that car to the LSX shootout and repeat those 60fts . The track should be prepped as good as it gets. If they let me,I might run some fun passes . My chevelle is a heavy street car that weighs 3500lbs and consistently runs mid 1 tens 60ft. Not trying to side with anybody. After they do some more testing, Phadt will see where they are at.

GMRULZ · 09-18-2010, 08:20 AM

Pfadt,

Your argument that some how all the other track timing lights worked
so how could the 60' light be screwed up? That's because all the beams reference the start beam. Nothing else references the 60' beam. Just fyi.

jbsrace1 · 09-18-2010, 05:36 PM

After racing for over 25 years I can tell you that 60 clocks have and do screw up. My S/G 240 cuts 1.28 60' times and runs 9.10's in the 1/4. I have a time slip showing a 1.01 60 and only running 9.23 My S/St 77 Camaro has 1.40 60 times and runs 10.20's in the 1/4 and I have a time slip showing it going 1.20 in the 60. No way either of them are correct. My L99 2010 Camaro runs 12.50's and has consistent 1.93 - 1.95 60 times. You can see it on page 36 of the Sept 3, 2010 National dragster

Sorry but there is no way he had a 1.46 60 time.

jbsrace1 · 09-18-2010, 09:17 PM

Look at that time slip again and compare it with your other slips.
Everything on that slip is off. Going by the 1/8th & 1000ft times he should have been on a mid to low 11 sec pass. 1320 & MPH is probably correct but the rest is extremely questionable.

*TAG UR IT* · 09-20-2010, 06:22 PM

There's a difference between good faith and intent. I don't think it was anyone's intent to post up false information. I think they put up the info in good faith believing the data provided by a VERY expensive and calibrated machine was correct....and btw, the data posted STILL has not been PROVED FALSE. Yes, there could have been problems....and most likely it didn't go that short. But, if it did...everyone here would be eatin' words...

FYI...................

Andro · 09-20-2010, 08:15 PM

PM Sent

Atti2de · 09-20-2010, 08:43 PM

wow what a bunch of keyboard tough guys....

09-18-2010, 08:20 AM	#44
GMRULZ Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: VA Posts: 1,819	Pfadt, Your argument that some how all the other track timing lights worked so how could the 60' light be screwed up? That's because all the beams reference the start beam. Nothing else references the 60' beam. Just fyi. __________________ 2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter. Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s! Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..

09-20-2010, 08:15 PM	#48
Andro NOICE!!! ™ Drives: Force Fed 427 Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: GOT BOOST? Posts: 5,214 View My Garage	PM Sent __________________

09-20-2010, 08:43 PM	#49
Atti2de Móderator Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: San Antonio Posts: 1,664 View My Garage	wow what a bunch of keyboard tough guys.... __________________ I'm not the one with the Atti2de problem it's everyone else that has a problem with my Atti2de!

09-17-2010, 04:50 PM	#43
Xtreme Innovations & Fab Account Suspended Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 174	This is my area of expertise and I think Phadts racing needs to bring that car to the LSX shootout and repeat those 60fts . The track should be prepped as good as it gets. If they let me,I might run some fun passes . My chevelle is a heavy street car that weighs 3500lbs and consistently runs mid 1 tens 60ft. Not trying to side with anybody. After they do some more testing, Phadt will see where they are at.

09-18-2010, 05:36 PM	#45
jbsrace1 Drives: 2010 2ss Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Georgia Posts: 211	After racing for over 25 years I can tell you that 60 clocks have and do screw up. My S/G 240 cuts 1.28 60' times and runs 9.10's in the 1/4. I have a time slip showing a 1.01 60 and only running 9.23 My S/St 77 Camaro has 1.40 60 times and runs 10.20's in the 1/4 and I have a time slip showing it going 1.20 in the 60. No way either of them are correct. My L99 2010 Camaro runs 12.50's and has consistent 1.93 - 1.95 60 times. You can see it on page 36 of the Sept 3, 2010 National dragster Sorry but there is no way he had a 1.46 60 time.

09-18-2010, 09:17 PM	#46
jbsrace1 Drives: 2010 2ss Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Georgia Posts: 211	Look at that time slip again and compare it with your other slips. Everything on that slip is off. Going by the 1/8th & 1000ft times he should have been on a mid to low 11 sec pass. 1320 & MPH is probably correct but the rest is extremely questionable.

09-20-2010, 06:22 PM	#47
TAG UR IT www.Camaro5store.com Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: SA, Texas Posts: 26,558 View My Garage	There's a difference between good faith and intent. I don't think it was anyone's *intent* to post up false information. I think they put up the info in *good faith* believing the data provided by a VERY expensive and calibrated machine was correct....and btw, the data posted STILL has not been PROVED FALSE. Yes, there could have been problems....and most likely it didn't go that short. But, if it did...everyone here would be eatin' words... FYI...................