Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2010, 11:08 PM   #1
2010ssraper
2010camaroSS
 
2010ssraper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 85
LS3 VS L99

What is the difference between the two? I know the LS3 is the M6 and the L99 is the A6 and the M6 is lighter than the L99. But what is the difference in the engines???
__________________
Quote:
It continues to amaze me. Ford guys think their shit is so great. Why then do you need DOHC and 4 valves per cyl. plus forced air to beat a production pushrod engine with 2 valves per cyl. Face it, when it comes down to it Ford just can't compete. New slogan for the Mustang. "You can't fix stupid"!
2010ssraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:13 PM   #2
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,497
VVT Variable Valve Timing and DOD Displacement on Demand for the L99. DOD sometimes called AFM Active Fuel Management is a system that drops the engine to 4 cylinder mode to save fuel. Keeps the L99 A6 at the same gas mileage numbers as the LS3 M6

Now that you have the buzz words and accronyms... search around as there are tons of threads on this stuff...
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:15 PM   #3
2010ssraper
2010camaroSS
 
2010ssraper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlee View Post
VVT Variable Valve Timing and DOD Displacement on Demand for the L99. DOD sometimes called AFM Active Fuel Management is a system that drops the engine to 4 cylinder mode to save fuel. Keeps the L99 A6 at the same gas mileage numbers as the LS3 M6
is the cause to why it makes about 26HP less?
__________________
Quote:
It continues to amaze me. Ford guys think their shit is so great. Why then do you need DOHC and 4 valves per cyl. plus forced air to beat a production pushrod engine with 2 valves per cyl. Face it, when it comes down to it Ford just can't compete. New slogan for the Mustang. "You can't fix stupid"!
2010ssraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:17 PM   #4
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010ssraper View Post
is the cause to why it makes about 26HP less?
Yes pretty much...
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:19 PM   #5
2010ssraper
2010camaroSS
 
2010ssraper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlee View Post
Yes pretty much...
Thats a little sad:( Otherwise don't they have the same exact engine specs?
__________________
Quote:
It continues to amaze me. Ford guys think their shit is so great. Why then do you need DOHC and 4 valves per cyl. plus forced air to beat a production pushrod engine with 2 valves per cyl. Face it, when it comes down to it Ford just can't compete. New slogan for the Mustang. "You can't fix stupid"!
2010ssraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:20 PM   #6
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010ssraper View Post
Thats a little sad:( Otherwise don't they have the same exact engine specs?
Yeah... but with some trans tuning the L99 really closes that gap... It's actally a sore subject, and some, like myself, end up tuning out AFM.
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:52 PM   #7
VADER SS L99


 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010ssraper View Post
is the cause to why it makes about 26HP less?
The reason the L99 makes less power than the LS3 is that GM with all its wisdom decided to put a baby cam in the car. I mean I dont even think the cam has over .500 of lift. The compression is a little lwer too because of valve reliefs but the heads, intake, crank, block, and rods are the same. The only major differences is the lifters, cam, pistons,intake valves and VVT timing chain. If GM had put the same size VVT cam in the L99 then it would have made more power than the LS3 and I could then justify my purchase being 1k more than the Ls3 manual combo.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
VADER SS L99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 01:27 PM   #8
2010ssraper
2010camaroSS
 
2010ssraper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
The reason the L99 makes less power than the LS3 is that GM with all its wisdom decided to put a baby cam in the car. I mean I dont even think the cam has over .500 of lift. The compression is a little lwer too because of valve reliefs but the heads, intake, crank, block, and rods are the same. The only major differences is the lifters, cam, pistons,intake valves and VVT timing chain. If GM had put the same size VVT cam in the L99 then it would have made more power than the LS3 and I could then justify my purchase being 1k more than the Ls3 manual combo.
So your saying if they used the same exact cam from the LS3 in the L99 then the L99 would have more power?
__________________
Quote:
It continues to amaze me. Ford guys think their shit is so great. Why then do you need DOHC and 4 valves per cyl. plus forced air to beat a production pushrod engine with 2 valves per cyl. Face it, when it comes down to it Ford just can't compete. New slogan for the Mustang. "You can't fix stupid"!
2010ssraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 01:57 PM   #9
moiy1983
 
moiy1983's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss/rs
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cleveland tx
Posts: 437
Everyone is entitled to ther opinion so here is mine. I currently own the manual 6 speed and it has CAI,HEADERS,CATBACK,CUSTOM CAM, SHORT THORW SHIFTER,& CUSTOM TUNE and that adds up 464rwhp and 430rwtq. It's a blast to drive. My problem with the car is I have a hard time launching the car at the track to get good 1/4 times at the track. If i could go back to when i was purchasing it i would probably lean more on buying the automatic. 26 horespower can be made up very easily but the consitency you get out of it in my opinion outways the 26 less horspower! but that doesnt mean without some practice you cant get it done! goodluck!
moiy1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 02:13 PM   #10
trudawg660

 
Drives: 2006 Dodge Charger / 2SS IOM
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010ssraper View Post
So your saying if they used the same exact cam from the LS3 in the L99 then the L99 would have more power?
yes it would but to do that u would have to change the lifter and springs, deleting VVT and etc on the DOD or AFM cylinders. and if ur going to pay that much to do that u might as well get a better aftermarket cam than the stock ls3 cam.
trudawg660 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 02:23 PM   #11
WeeZee
 
Drives: SuperSport's
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by moiy1983 View Post
Everyone is entitled to ther opinion so here is mine. I currently own the manual 6 speed and it has CAI,HEADERS,CATBACK,CUSTOM CAM, SHORT THORW SHIFTER,& CUSTOM TUNE and that adds up 464rwhp and 430rwtq. It's a blast to drive. My problem with the car is I have a hard time launching the car at the track to get good 1/4 times at the track. If i could go back to when i was purchasing it i would probably lean more on buying the automatic. 26 horespower can be made up very easily but the consitency you get out of it in my opinion outways the 26 less horspower! but that doesnt mean without some practice you cant get it done! goodluck!
Easy trick for good launch bro. Nitto NT05 275/35/20 drag radials @ 30psi. Slip the clutch at 3000 rpm's, ease into the gas pedal while keeping consistant clutch with ur left foot off the line. when u feel the grab and bog alittle, dump the clutch and powershift. I have had 4 cars with Nitto drag radials and they all cut 1.7-1.8 60ft's (2004 350z ProCharged, 96 Mustang GT, 2003 Mach1 & 02 CamaroSS)
__________________
2002 Chevy CamaroSS MN6
'08 Chevy TBSS AWD "DD"
Plans : 2013 CamaroSS 1LE
WeeZee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 02:45 PM   #12
2010ssraper
2010camaroSS
 
2010ssraper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by trudawg660 View Post
yes it would but to do that u would have to change the lifter and springs, deleting VVT and etc on the DOD or AFM cylinders. and if ur going to pay that much to do that u might as well get a better aftermarket cam than the stock ls3 cam.
Well I honestly don't mind about deleting the VVT or whatever, thats perfectly fine with me. I kind of was leaning towards getting the LG Motorsports G6X3 cam anyways. Hey BTW does anyone know of a good cam from LG Motorsports to use for a TT setup?
__________________
Quote:
It continues to amaze me. Ford guys think their shit is so great. Why then do you need DOHC and 4 valves per cyl. plus forced air to beat a production pushrod engine with 2 valves per cyl. Face it, when it comes down to it Ford just can't compete. New slogan for the Mustang. "You can't fix stupid"!
2010ssraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 02:53 PM   #13
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by moiy1983 View Post
Everyone is entitled to ther opinion so here is mine. I currently own the manual 6 speed and it has CAI,HEADERS,CATBACK,CUSTOM CAM, SHORT THORW SHIFTER,& CUSTOM TUNE and that adds up 464rwhp and 430rwtq. It's a blast to drive. My problem with the car is I have a hard time launching the car at the track to get good 1/4 times at the track. If i could go back to when i was purchasing it i would probably lean more on buying the automatic. 26 horespower can be made up very easily but the consitency you get out of it in my opinion outways the 26 less horspower! but that doesnt mean without some practice you cant get it done! goodluck!
Have fun learning it... I actually get bored because all my runs are identical. Unless I have a new mod to test it's just the same ole same ole.

After 3 or 4 runs with timeslips that look like they came off a copy machine... what's the use.

Bracket racing here I come...
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 07:23 PM   #14
JohnJ@Texas-Speed
 
Drives: Body In White Camaro
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 18
Make no mistake the L99 has the potential to make more power across the board thanks to the VVT stuff. Give it time, I believe with a custom TSP camshaft & PRC's new cylinder head castings we'll see 500rwhp A6 L99 cars!!

Just gotta get those stinkin lifters out of that thing!!
JohnJ@Texas-Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LS3 engine specifications Tran Wiki 3 10-06-2010 10:56 PM
LS3 and L99? black2black10 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 26 05-07-2010 12:58 AM
LS3 vs L99 mods ORANGE U NV Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 4 01-10-2010 09:45 AM
Solo Performance V8 Quantum Axle-Back Exhaust Kit for LS3 and L99 GOINGSOLO2 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 1 12-03-2009 02:01 PM
LS3 vs. L99 LS3 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 12 01-21-2009 10:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.