10-18-2012, 03:41 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro - BIW Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 198
|
|
10-18-2012, 03:42 PM | #16 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro - BIW Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 198
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:47 PM | #17 |
Drives: 2010 CGM 2ss/rs M6 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The Beach
Posts: 109
|
what set of heads would give max Horsepower gains with this cam? I need details, do you recomend a certain milling/chamber size , compression etc... i really want a maxed out N/A setup without cutting valve reliefs. I plan to spray it with a 150-200 shot after the heads and cam...
|
10-18-2012, 04:52 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro - BIW Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 198
|
http://www.texas-speed.com/p-4008-pr...der-heads.aspx
Those would be my choice for a stock bottom-end combo with this cam! We can get you even better piston to valve clearance with those, and a nice little bump in compression over stock as well! |
10-18-2012, 05:23 PM | #19 |
Burning up tires
Drives: 2023 ZL1 Vert Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Macomb Twp, MI
Posts: 716
|
Call me crazy, but I don't see much of a difference between the two cams. Maybe a few hp up top with a small loss on the bottom end..
|
10-18-2012, 05:25 PM | #20 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro - BIW Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 198
|
About 10hp up top from what was previously the largest cam we would recommend without absolutely destroying clearance....that's a nice chunk, in my opinion!
|
10-18-2012, 06:07 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2010 CGM 2ss/rs M6 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The Beach
Posts: 109
|
what kind of numbers are we talking to the wheels on a m6 ls3 car with those heads and that cam?? I have longtubes no cats , vararam intake ,etc... what cc chamber would you do ? what would work best with the spray?
|
10-18-2012, 06:14 PM | #22 |
Drives: 2010 1ssrs Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburg Texas
Posts: 669
|
For my L99, could the grind be adjusted to make up for that lack of compression?
Sorry if that's a stupid question.
__________________
|
10-19-2012, 10:09 AM | #23 | |
Drives: 2011 SSm6 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
I assume that the seat to seat timing is a little slower on the 235 lobe than the 231 lobe, to gain the extra valve to piston clearance? Did you bolt the aftermarket heads on this engine with this cam? Thanks for sharing the dyno results btw. |
|
10-19-2012, 10:15 AM | #24 |
Master ASE, GM, LSX Tech.
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,034
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:15 AM | #25 |
aka Patrick
|
my best guess is it would work very well with it.
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft |
10-20-2012, 08:23 AM | #26 |
Drives: Camaro Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,669
|
The 255cc heads were on it for a few pulls and it makes just under 600 flywheel hp. 597 I believe . The 255cc heads move right at 370 cfm so it probably would have even gone farther with a nice intake upgrade!
|
03-23-2013, 01:51 PM | #27 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2005 CTS-V Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Las Cruces
Posts: 51
|
This is the cam I got. In the process of the install. I should be done this week. I'll get vid of the car done. Cant wait! I'll be sending my pcm to you on monday Jason!
|
03-25-2013, 09:17 AM | #28 |
Drives: Camaro Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,669
|
Send it over my friend! I'll post dyno videos of that cam & some PRC heads making over 600 flywheel for ya!
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|