Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2011, 10:03 AM   #1
LS7 427
10.11 @ 136.32
 
LS7 427's Avatar
 
Drives: Black & Yellow 2SS/RS LPE LS7 427
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Redcliff, Alberta
Posts: 957
Arrow Questions on stroking and forged internals.

I currently have a TVS2300 that has the intake ported, LPE 69cc CNC heads with upgraded valve train, LPE GT-9 cam, L99 -LS3 conversion, RotFab CAI, Stainlessworks 1-7/8" headers and 3" exhaust. Not really related but for information purposes I also have an RPM Transmission 3.70 diff, DSS 1400 hp axles, Phadt diff bushings, subframe bushings, sway bars and inverted coilovers.

The car dyno's at 590rwhp and I am running a conservative 7lbs boost to preserve the stock bottom end, which leads me to my questions. I would like to stroke my motor and replace the rotating system with forged internals to be able to increase boost to10psi. My goal is to have a car who's application is about 60% track and 40% street.

My preference would be to stroke the 376ci. motor to 427ci. with ~10:1 compression.

Question #1
  • Can I get 427ci. by leaving the bore stock and increasing piston stroke?
Question #2
  • What would you recommend for crank, pistons, rings, etc?
Question #3
  • I would like to get just slightly more aggressive with the cam, what could replace the GT-9 to accomplish this?
Question # Last
  • Could I reuse the LPE 69cc heads or would I need the 73cc to have 10:1 compression?

Thanks, Bryan
LS7 427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 04:57 PM   #2
Notneb
 
Drives: 2006 Dodge Viper
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 133
Bump
Notneb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 11:20 PM   #3
jrpxxii


 
jrpxxii's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS 427ci
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 3,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAMROSS View Post
I currently have a TVS2300 that has the intake ported, LPE 69cc CNC heads with upgraded valve train, LPE GT-9 cam, L99 -LS3 conversion, RotFab CAI, Stainlessworks 1-7/8" headers and 3" exhaust. Not really related but for information purposes I also have an RPM Transmission 3.70 diff, DSS 1400 hp axles, Phadt diff bushings, subframe bushings, sway bars and inverted coilovers.

The car dyno's at 590rwhp and I am running a conservative 7lbs boost to preserve the stock bottom end, which leads me to my questions. I would like to stroke my motor and replace the rotating system with forged internals to be able to increase boost to10psi. My goal is to have a car who's application is about 60% track and 40% street.

My preference would be to stroke the 376ci. motor to 427ci. with ~10:1 compression.

Question #1
  • Can I get 427ci. by leaving the bore stock and increasing piston stroke?
Question #2
  • What would you recommend for crank, pistons, rings, etc?
Question #3
  • I would like to get just slightly more aggressive with the cam, what could replace the GT-9 to accomplish this?
Question # Last
  • Could I reuse the LPE 69cc heads or would I need the 73cc to have 10:1 compression?

Thanks, Bryan
Sure you can, just take the motor you have now, jerk it out, replace with an LSX427 and build as you would like it.
__________________
jrpxxii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 11:28 PM   #4
hot ss

 
hot ss's Avatar
 
Drives: aqua 2ss l99
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,215
did you ask steve as well??
__________________
May your exhaust note, sing in harmony with your blower.
hot ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 06:01 AM   #5
NEGXXIS

 
NEGXXIS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro SS A10
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,062
427 cubes on a LS3 based engine is not really recommended for boost, the piston is not as thick as a 416 or 418. But there are some people that have good luck with a boosted LS3 based 427. I am hoping that I will be one of the lucky ones since that is exactly what I am doing as we speak.
Good luck with you project which ever way you choose to go.
__________________
2020 Range Rover Sport HSE P525 Supercharged 5.0 - Firenze Red - 9012 wheels
SOLD 2019 Camaro SS -Wrapped in Matte Magnectic Black - Anderson Carbon Hood and Rear Spoiler – Ikon front spoiler – OEM ZL1 Side Rockers - ZL1 Addons Diffuser - BMR 1.0” Lowering Springs - MRR 228 Wheels 20x10 and 20x11
RIP 2016 Camaro SS https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=565453
SOLD 2010 Camaro SS Featured in GM High Tech Performance and Camaro Now Magazines - http://www.superchevy.com/features/g...of-perfection/
NEGXXIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 07:23 AM   #6
LS7 427
10.11 @ 136.32
 
LS7 427's Avatar
 
Drives: Black & Yellow 2SS/RS LPE LS7 427
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Redcliff, Alberta
Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by hot ss View Post
did you ask steve as well??
Yes, we've been discussing it at length. His shop will do the build, but he has challenged me to do my homework on 416 vs 427 before he takes my cash.


Quote:
Originally Posted by EZ SPEED View Post
427 cubes on a LS3 based engine is not really recommended for boost, the piston is not as thick as a 416 or 418. But there are some people that have good luck with a boosted LS3 based 427. I am hoping that I will be one of the lucky ones since that is exactly what I am doing as we speak.
Good luck with you project which ever way you choose to go.
Thanks for the info.

Bryan
LS7 427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 08:03 AM   #7
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
I'd leave the cubes as is. Cubes aren't going to limit you. After you build a forged bottom, you can spin the TVS up to its practical limits anyway. About the only thing more cubes will give you is more power down low. I'm guessing with a forged bottom and 3" blower pulley, you'll have all you can handle. You'll keep a few more bucks in the bank and get a little better mpg too. You're about at the point where a little more costs a lot more. Yes, absolutely, you can push it. For me, it wouldn't be worth it. Guess you have to decide

If you are hell bent on stroking it, my vote would go for the 416. Those extra few cubes come at a price.
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 08:27 AM   #8
Slim2SS
Black Thunder
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
I'd leave the cubes as is. Cubes aren't going to limit you. After you build a forged bottom, you can spin the TVS up to its practical limits anyway. About the only thing more cubes will give you is more power down low. I'm guessing with a forged bottom and 3" blower pulley, you'll have all you can handle. You'll keep a few more bucks in the bank and get a little better mpg too. You're about at the point where a little more costs a lot more. Yes, absolutely, you can push it. For me, it wouldn't be worth it. Guess you have to decide

If you are hell bent on stroking it, my vote would go for the 416. Those extra few cubes come at a price.
X2
__________________
JRE 416 9:1 Forged Stroker Package
Edlebrock E-Force Super Charger
JRE Blower Cam package
Cooling Mist Water/Meth
3.25 blower pulley
FAST 65 lb. hr. injectors
JRE Edelbrock fuel system upgrade
GM ZR-1 Clutch
Roto Fab CAI
Kooks Headers Jet Hot Coated
Kooks High Flow Cats
3" Magnaflow Stainless Steel Exhaust
Barton Short Throw Shifter
JRE Dyno Tune
Slim2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 09:01 AM   #9
Jason 98 TA

 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,669
We can select a piston to get compression where we need it so there should be no issue there. We do a lot of the 418s for Maggie customers and you should be able to support 900 flywheel hp with that blower. . Give us a call to discuss your combo, I bet we have a few short blocks in stock to get you going.
Jason 98 TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 09:31 AM   #10
Z_Rocks

 
Z_Rocks's Avatar
 
Drives: everyone crazy...
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
I'd leave the cubes as is. Cubes aren't going to limit you. After you build a forged bottom, you can spin the TVS up to its practical limits anyway. About the only thing more cubes will give you is more power down low. I'm guessing with a forged bottom and 3" blower pulley, you'll have all you can handle. You'll keep a few more bucks in the bank and get a little better mpg too. You're about at the point where a little more costs a lot more. Yes, absolutely, you can push it. For me, it wouldn't be worth it. Guess you have to decide

If you are hell bent on stroking it, my vote would go for the 416. Those extra few cubes come at a price.
AS he says above. When your F/I use the S/C to get more air into the engine than cube would. That's what F/I does without the need of going bigger cube. The 2.0 liter Ecotec from GM and a turbo was able to produce 1000 HP from crate engine.
Keep your stock cube and spend that money on drive train and suspension and tranny, where you will need it. Again, with a good designed F/I engine, you can get a lot of power even from a small engine.
I saw a Honda S2000 putting out 700 RWHP in front of my own eyes with a single turbo.
Z_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 12:43 PM   #11
Notneb
 
Drives: 2006 Dodge Viper
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 133
Slim2SS what kind of hp is your setup putting down?
Notneb is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stroking VS Blowing? 11flat Forced Induction - V8 10 10-19-2009 04:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.