Twin Turbo Bumble Bee built for ARP Fasteners

[SA CHEVY]

Originally Posted by Granatelli

It sounds louder on the video than it does in person :( - This car is driven by a 23yrs old girl and she reports no drown and no problems with sound while driving. Her Boy friend as a G8 with long tubes and Corsa that is louder

Amazing with as young as she is being able to equip a vehicle like that but some people have the good bounce and others don't bounce at all and have to climb (me being that guy ). Since you guys will be at the Fest I'll let you take a look at my car and when I come down to do the vinyl who knows, may try to leave with more than that. Also you'll be able to hear my LT's with no cats straight piped (since my sponsor didn't send me the right mufflers in time for the Fest). Awesome build again though.

[Granatelli]

The goal is to have the ARP car on display

[SSE 4 2SS]

I sure like my TTI/Granatelli kit...and the numbers produced...

[Granatelli]

Originally Posted by speedster

Nice job JR.

Looks really good and those are some great numbers.

Well - auto trans sucks power - especially the stock auto trans:( Had this car been manual I am sure there would have been 40 to 50 more in hp and 30 to 40 more in trq. I just love how a properly tuned Turbo motor has more torque than hp power - it shows (and Proves) the turbo give up nothing down lower to a roots

[SonnyakaPig]

Great build. Very nice looking.

Just curious, did this car actually weigh 3800 lbs when it was dynod with a driver in it?

[Granatelli]

are you reffering to the dyno test. We set a weight on the dyno to help load the rollers

[2010SSRSM6]

Holy Crap!!

I just realized you tuned this for 89 octane????

Where are the numbers for an LS3 and a 91 tune??

How much of an improvement are you seeing using the FAST 102 intake over stock?

Have you done an LS3 with your ported heads, ported FAST intake and a 91 tune yet?

[2010SSRSM6]

Subscribed

[Granatelli]

Originally Posted by 2010SSRSM6

Holy Crap!!

I just realized you tuned this for 89 octane????

Where are the numbers for an LS3 and a 91 tune??

How much of an improvement are you seeing using the FAST 102 intake over stock?

Have you done an LS3 with your ported heads, ported FAST intake and a 91 tune yet?

The turbos will support 1300hp. Basically you can make as much power as you want. it comes down to how far you want to push the stock parts. We say stop at 650 rwhp.

THe FAST102 manifold was good for 12hp. It looks good but the turbo more than makes up for it. You really don't it until you go for 800-plus

[SonnyakaPig]

Originally Posted by Granatelli

are you reffering to the dyno test. We set a weight on the dyno to help load the rollers

Yes, referring to the "3800 lbs" stated on the dyno sheet.

Just to let you know, I don't know one way or the other how the weight you pre-set affects the dyno results. I was just asking because I've noticed vehicle weights are sometimes set inaccurately on dyno tests and I've always been curious whether that has any impact on the results.

Let me clarify, I'm not doubting your results, and perhaps the car in the dyno actually makes more power than listed -- I don't know.

Just asking a technical question.

Also, why 89 octane? just why? As iyou can see, I have mixed emotions when I see this.

[Granatelli]

Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig

Yes, referring to the "3800 lbs" stated on the dyno sheet.

Just to let you know, I don't know one way or the other how the weight you pre-set affects the dyno results. I was just asking because I've noticed vehicle weights are sometimes set inaccurately on dyno tests and I've always been curious whether that has any impact on the results.

Let me clarify, I'm not doubting your results, and perhaps the car in the dyno actually makes more power than listed -- I don't know.

Just asking a technical question.

Also, why 89 octane? just why? As iyou can see, I have mixed emotions when I see this.

On a Mustang dyno - You tell the dyno what the cars weighs and what the frontal area of the car is so you can simulate driving down the road. If I tell the dyno the car weighs less - it puts less load on the tires and the sweep test is shorter.

If you know Granatelli, then you know we under quote not the other way around Are numbers are conservative. Plus this will be the 10th auto trans car we have tested with the same parts installed and they all do the same thing plus or minus 11 hp.

89 octane - That is what the customer asked for - A VERY Conservative Tune

[SonnyakaPig]

Originally Posted by Granatelli

On a Mustang dyno - You tell the dyno what the cars weighs and what the frontal area of the car is so you can simulate driving down the road. If I tell the dyno the car weighs less - it puts less load on the tires and the sweep test is shorter.

If you know Granatelli, then you know we under quote not the other way around Are numbers are conservative. Plus this will be the 10th auto trans car we have tested with the same parts installed and they all do the same thing plus or minus 11 hp.

89 octane - That is what the customer asked for - A VERY Conservative Tune

Thank you for the information.

What is the "sweep test"?

Not sure if you remember, but I've never doubted you guys.

[Granatelli]

Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig

Thank you for the information.

What is the "sweep test"?

Not sure if you remember, but I've never doubted you guys.

I remember everything and I know you were always pro GMS and stock up for D-racer as well.

Sweep test just means the range the dyno starts and stops

[shl4Z28]

Originally Posted by Granatelli

It sounds louder on the video than it does in person :( - This car is driven by a 23yrs old girl and she reports no drown and no problems with sound while driving. Her Boy friend as a G8 with long tubes and Corsa that is louder

23 yr old girl?!!!! I hate SoCal sometimes....