Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2015, 07:20 PM   #1
tomlink

 
tomlink's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 953
Send a message via Skype™ to tomlink
Drag Has Significant Effect on MPG

I drove to the beach in NC this weekend. Basically I take just one road, US 64, all the way. Even though it is one road, the speed limit moves around a lot, from a low of 35 through a few towns, to 70 on the freeway sections. I thought I'd reset my DIC to see what kind of mileage I'd get with the cruise control on for 200 miles. I was surprised when I checked it at my destination it was 25 MPG.

Now it was 95 outside and I had the AC on the whole time. But I have driven like that before and my MPG was closer to 30MPG. I was a bit concerned that perhaps there was some sort of engine malfunction. I didn't notice any hesitation or other indication of a problem.

On the way back I kept resetting the DIC in each speed zone to see if that was a factor. Other trips were always on roads with lower top speed limits.

It seems that when I was traveling about 75MPH I was getting only 24MPG. When I was going 65 that went up to 28MPG, and at 60 it was 30.5. Probably 150 miles of the trip were at 75.

I gotta say I was surprised. The car shows no sign of struggling against drag factors at 75. I thought our cars had a better drag coefficient than I observed today.

Have other folks observed something like this? Are newer models better? Mine is a 2011. It does look like the 2016 paid more attention to drag in the body design.
tomlink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 07:32 PM   #2
Texas RattleSnake
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ss/rs
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: ky
Posts: 86
I drove to Tennessee this past week which is about a 230 mile trip. This was my first actual long drive in the camaro ( ss ls3 m6) so I was anxious to see what kind of mileage I could get on the highway. I don't do much highway driving. I kept it steady between 65 and 70. After I arrived It was showing 26 mpg which i was surprised. And only used about a half tank of gas
__________________
Texas RattleSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 07:37 PM   #3
TooCool5


 
TooCool5's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LS 3.6 LLT V6 325 HP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: LS
Posts: 4,242
Definitely right about the drag, on a back country road at 45-50 mph I can
easily do 34-35 mpg in my LS with Airaid intake.
On the highway it goes down a few mpg at 65-70 mph.
__________________
2010 Camaro Auto, Inferno Orange, Titanium Interior, Gearhead Wheels AIRAID CAI
TooCool5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 07:41 PM   #4
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,850
Not surprising at all... more speed more fuel consumption.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 07:48 PM   #5
Airmaster
Go Gators!
 
Airmaster's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Jeep Abarth 944 325i
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 844
I get roughly 25 MPG driving highway between 65 and 80 MPH in the hot Florida summer. I have gotten up to 30 MPGs driving 60, but that was before my tire/wheel upgrade and my addition of a larger spoiler as well as a splitter. Both could be having a slightly negative effect, which means they are probably doing their job in producing downforce (drag being a side effect).

I thought it might be bad myself but I think its a combo of the heat, my low tire pressures (at the time, since then I brought them up a bit), and my aggressive driving...

In the city I still manage around 20 MPGs... lower if I rag on it.

What kills our cars is the weight, and yes, drag. Camaro actually has a pretty low drag coefficient but hauling around the weight just doesn't help.
__________________
'13 Camaro, '97 Wrangler, '12 500 Abarth, '85.5 944, '06 325i

Suspension Mods: BMR and JPSS Sways, BMR Poly Bushings, BMR strut tower brace, BMR control arms, BMR toe arms, stock springs and struts
Engine Mods: All bolt ons (haha)
Brake Mods: Brembo SS caliper swap front and rear
Airmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 08:06 PM   #6
Rock-It Man
376 cubic inches of fun
 
Rock-It Man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 4,031
If you are on a level road at a constant speed, most of the energy goes to overcoming drag.

If you are stopping and going in slow traffic, most of the the energy goes into accelerating the mass of the car.
Rock-It Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 08:51 PM   #7
FASTDIESEL
 
FASTDIESEL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS L99 SLP Cosmetics
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 382
Got 22.8 on a tankful on the recent Power Tour. 70 MPH with air on, two occupants and a trunk-full of stuff. One tankful was only 19.7, hitting a 20 MPH headwind between Champaign and St. Louis, plus some gridlock in Champaign.

Tuning out the AFM cost about 2 MPG (highway, no change city), but is SO worth it in terms of smoothness!
__________________
13.244 @ 104.91 100% stock (#17).
Now - Mike Norris catch can. 245/50/19 Firestone Wingfoot A/S on LT2 black powder coated rims (square). 1 7/8" Speed-Engineering LTH, off road pipes, tune.
Now 12.93 @ 109.13.
FASTDIESEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 10:11 PM   #8
SIN R G

 
Drives: 2008 VW R32, 2011 Synergy Green 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Randolph, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,544
Also on the Power Tour on the first half on the way to Baton Rouge I put on 1814 miles I got 19.8. I was a little surprised at that number considering on how much of that time was sitting in traffic idling. On the way home I reset it and we put on 1087 miles and I got 22.1. A lot of this was with the cruise control set at 81 or 82. I am only guessing but if we would have done the trip back and kept it at 65 I bet we would have got around 25.
SIN R G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 10:24 PM   #9
Camaro Dude


 
Camaro Dude's Avatar
 
Drives: ‘13 1LE
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,904
The 4th gen had a lower Cd than the 5th Gen, so no major breakthrough here as far as wind slicing goes, lol.

Curious what the 6th gen brings to the table.
Camaro Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 10:34 PM   #10
songsj

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS Summit White
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MPLS
Posts: 804
Quote:
The 4th gen had a lower Cd than the 5th Gen, so no major breakthrough here as far as wind slicing goes, lol.

Curious what the 6th gen brings to the table.
I believe this maybe true as when I would take my foot off the gas with my 4th gen, it would coast forever. Even on a flat surface. More than any other car I've ever owned.
songsj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 10:45 PM   #11
Rangore

 
Rangore's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS 45th Anniversary Ed
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,220
I noticed that I lost 2 MPG by having the windows down at 70 MPH.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS 45th Anniversary Edition - No longer owned: 2010 Camaro 2LT, 1993 Camaro Z-28
Rangore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2015, 05:49 AM   #12
Chevy_cowboy

 
Chevy_cowboy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 IOM 2SS/RS M6 Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,287
No kidding.

Even something as simple as a clean waxed car vs a dirty one will affect mileage. Speed certainly does, as does wind direction and speed, pavement type, tire inflation, and dozens of other factors. The biggest single factor is the nut behind the wheel though.
__________________
Chevy_cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2015, 07:08 AM   #13
WoodBoss
"Old School"
 
Drives: 2010 2SS L99
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sherrills Ford, NC
Posts: 1,295
That is why back in the 1970s during the gas shortage the National Speed limit was set @ 55mph.
WoodBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2015, 11:38 AM   #14
mth35115
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro rs/ss inferno orange
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 232
Also, the outside air temperature will affect how well an engine burns fuel, so in cold weather you will get better gas mileage. This had more of an affect on carburated cars, than modern fuel injected cars, but you will see a difference between a 60* and a 95* day.
__________________

HOT ROD SS
MTH35115
mth35115 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.