13' 1LE VS 10' challenger R/T hemi 5.7

[bigssc]

this thread is awesomely bad lol

[bigssc]

this should have been posted at page 3

[Ronin_2SS]

A stock 392 will drag a stock SS down the 1320. How do i know? I have both sitting in my garage. A 2013 392 manual and a 2010 LS3 SS. Even a 1LE with its better gears ect ect I doubt can catch a 392 once they are both out of the 60ft. Fan boys cry because truth hurts.

[08-G35s/6MT]

Oh really now? There was 6 speed 392 doing consistent 14's at my track tonight

[08-G35s/6MT]

The truth hurts... That's what you were saying right?

[Deki]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Oh really now? There was 6 speed 392 doing consistent 14's at my track tonight

And I've never seen a G35 run faster then a 14.5 even modded...but it happens.

[Ronin_2SS]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

The truth hurts... That's what you were saying right?

Yup that's exactly what I said. What's your point? I can "claim" I see camaros running 14's all night also. Point is unless you've driven both cars screaming from the sidelines doesn't mean anything.

[SRT8Tech]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Oh really now? There was 6 speed 392 doing consistent 14's at my track tonight

That poor car needs a real driver. Sad really............

[08-G35s/6MT]

Originally Posted by Ronin_2SS

Yup that's exactly what I said. What's your point? I can "claim" I see camaros running 14's all night also. Point is unless you've driven both cars screaming from the sidelines doesn't mean anything.

My point was he talks about 392's beating on all SS's under any and all circumstances. That's simply not the case, times and drivers vary so widely.

[Ronin_2SS]

And I reiterate, what's your point? In the scientific method two different drivers adds a unknown variable which cannot reproduce consistency. The only way to satisfy this is to have the same driver drive both cars then compare results. I've done that and the SRT8 is faster. Period. Throwing different drivers in the equation is like throwing in mods. A good driver will beat a bad driver, wow big surprise. That proves nothing.

[CobraBall]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

My point was he talks about 392's beating on all SS's under any and all circumstances. That's simply not the case, times and drivers vary so widely.

I think most rational human beings realize that, taking the driver out of the equation, a 392 is going to be faster than an SS more often than not.

The only way to satisfy this is to have the same driver drive both cars then compare results. I've done that and the SRT8 is faster. Period. Throwing different drivers in the equation is like throwing in mods. A good driver will beat a bad driver, wow big surprise. That proves nothing.

Pretty much. Introducing the driver into the equation is a red herring, we're comparing the cars, not the drivers or how they're driven. There's nothing that inherently makes either car more difficult or easier to drive than the other either.

[Stew]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Oh really now? There was 6 speed 392 doing consistent 14's at my track tonight

That person needs their mancard taken away and forced to drive a Prius...... Considering you claim mid to low 13s in a G37, you should have asked him to let you drive it, could've been the first stock 11 second pass......................

[Michael2000]

Originally Posted by SRT8Tech

Here is a copy of a 392 timeslip sticky on the Challenger forums. And actually a lot of guys are not on this list. Especially from the Charger Forums. I don't think they have a 392 fast list on the Charger forum.

01: mdgrwl 10.958@126.12 1.708 60' 392 Supercharger and Stroker
02: gasgonewild 11.365@120.88 1.642 60' 392 A5 Supercharger, Stall & drag radials
03: EnvyousSRT 11.607@119.67 1.839 60' 392 A5 Supercharger, Catback
04: Joe Agent 11.627@120.33 1.803 60' 392 A5 Magnacharger (U.F.O.'s car)
05: cosmer 11.642@118.23 1.750 60' 392 A5 nitrous
06: U.F.O. 11.810@119.10 1.834 60' 382 A5 Magnacharger
07: indybill 11.873@113.79 1.594 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back, converter drag radials
08: KJ392 11.903@115.62 1.772 60' 392 A5 CAI Tune
09: brian@snl 11.960@114.31 1.707 60' 392 A5 CAI. Catback, Converter, drag radials
10: 04bluesrt4 12.028@111.88 1.645 60' 392
11: mexi 12.139@114.36 1.773 60' 392 A5 Superbee nitto'strinity tune
12: SRT8Tech 12.253@113.86 1.907 60' 392 A5 stock
13: Dad's Toy 12.283@114.18 1.845 60' 392 A5 strut tower braces, sub frame connectors
14: vichris 12.291@112.00 1.836 60' 392 392 A5 cutouts drag radials
15: BlownGTX 12.352@112.28 1.794 60' 392 A5 Headers, catback, tune, drag radials
16: 392charger: 12.371@113.12 1.830 60' 392 A5 Charger Drag Radials
17: Capo 12.395@12.395 1.906 60' 392 A5 Stock
18: newmoon 12.464@112.00 1.929 60' 392 A5 stock (Error on MPH on time slip)
19: driven by 12.465@110.29 1.884 60' 392 M6 Drag Radials
20: KyHemiRT 12.517@110.84 1.849 60' 392 A5 stock
21: PRoBLeMz 12.548@112.16 2.005 60' 392 A5 Header
22: 1BadTungsten392 12.550@113.59 1.889 60' A5 Tune, Headers, CAI
23: 04bluesrt4 12.557@113.35 1.967 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back
24: SparkChicken 12.566@111.76 1.913 60' 392 A5 stock
25: Kakdiesel1 12.593@113.71 2.070 60' 392 A5 stock
26: Hreagle 12.598@112.35 1.945 60' 392 M6 Drag radials , tune, CAI, Cat Back
27: 392Convert 12.613@115.25 2.001 60' 392 Procharger
28: Flying Dutchman 12.630@111.92 2.033 60' A5 stock
29: trailrider9 12.644@113.49 2.052 60' 392 M6 CAI, Nitto's
30: bskylerj 12.650@110.44 1.904 60' 392 A5 stock
31: tntmachine 12.657@111.15 1.869 60' 392 A5 catback
32: 555ss 12.685@109.16 1.878 60' 392 M6 Stock
33: DonP 12.696@110.06 1.912 60' 392 A5 stock
34: Red Barron 12.744@109.92 2.021 60' M6 Stock
35: vichammer 12.753@109.89 1.932 60' 392 M6 Cat back
36: hemi420 12.769@113.35 1.933 60' 392 M6 stock
37: Viper 12.769@111.78 2.033 60' 392 M6 K&N
38: MrBohica 12.789@115.09 2.1011 60' 392 stock
39: CrankCase 12.805@109.05 2.007 60' M6 stock
40: nevertoofast 12.8439@105.73 2.1492 60' 392 A5 K&N
41: rayzazoo 12.847@109.89 1.976 60' 392 A5 stock
42: GodsRodsHEMI 12.911@110.33 2.059 60' 392 A5 stock
43: Hoopester 12.974@112.09 2.059 60' 392 M6 stock
44: Madcoder 13.013@107.22 2.174 60' 392 A5 stock
45: JDGA80 13.052@109.16 2.181 60' 392 M6 B&G tune CAI, Headers MT ETs
46: Whisky Tango Foxtrot! 13.093@109.31 2.121 60' 392 M6 Stock
47: Mayra 13.220@107.30 2.161 60' 392 A5 stock
48: Litos 13.268@106.58 2.119 60' 392 A5 stock
49: rmeaux 13.320@108.56 2.228 60' 392 M6 stock
50: SRT8PWR 13.393@108.47 2.272 60' 392 M6 Stock
51: kwoolums67 13.709@102.79 2.079 60' 392 Stock
52: AZZKIKR 13.730@102.62 2.146 60' M6 382 Stock
53: muzza61 13.787@105.12 2.446 60' 392 K&N, catback
54: B5Classic 14.350@102.00 2.454 60' 392 M6 Stock

I haven't looked at the magazine tests in a while, but did they all test manuals? The best I am seeing with a stock M6 is 12.685, which is about the same as the mags.

Michael

[Stew]

Originally Posted by Michael2000

I haven't looked at the magazine tests in a while, but did they all test manuals? The best I am seeing with a stock M6 is 12.685, which is about the same as the mags.

Michael

Only mainsteam media I know of that has tested an auto is edmunds and even those chimps got a 12.6.