Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-20-2013, 10:18 AM   #1
steph09
 
steph09's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 191
0-60 timing

Ok so I guess I've been neglecting my car by putting regular 87 in it and I just realized that I need to be putting premium in it .

Car has been sluggish and I read some stuff about the fuse pull (fuses 5 & 20). I'm going to try to let my tank run as close to E as I can and then fill it with the premium. Should I wait to do the fuse pull till I go through the premium. Or is it good if I just do the fuse pull after I fill it up or should I cycle through till the next premium fill up?

Also I want to time a 0-60 run from before and after. Any suggestions beside using my phone as a stop watch?
steph09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 10:25 AM   #2
CamaroSkooter
Retarded One-Legged Owl
 
CamaroSkooter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 9,745
http://www.virginiamotorsportspk.com/
__________________

My VIN = 2G1FK1EJ9A9105017
Build Date: 04-23-2009 according to:
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php
CamaroSkooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 10:39 AM   #3
cableman
 
Drives: camaro
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: long island
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by steph09 View Post
Ok so I guess I've been neglecting my car by putting regular 87 in it and I just realized that I need to be putting premium in it .

Car has been sluggish and I read some stuff about the fuse pull (fuses 5 & 20). I'm going to try to let my tank run as close to E as I can and then fill it with the premium. Should I wait to do the fuse pull till I go through the premium. Or is it good if I just do the fuse pull after I fill it up or should I cycle through till the next premium fill up?

Also I want to time a 0-60 run from before and after. Any suggestions beside using my phone as a stop watch?
Your never gonna get an accurate 0to60 using that method....the gains will be so neglible if any at all.
cableman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 10:45 AM   #4
steph09
 
steph09's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableman View Post
Your never gonna get an accurate 0to60 using that method....the gains will be so neglible if any at all.

yeah I guess I was being optimistic about the gains I would have. How much HP do you think I'd gain.
steph09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 10:52 AM   #5
cableman
 
Drives: camaro
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: long island
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by steph09 View Post
yeah I guess I was being optimistic about the gains I would have. How much HP do you think I'd gain.
No one really knows for sure. My opinion? 10 at the most.
cableman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 10:58 AM   #6
Ringo64
Forever Pontiac
 
Drives: 2012 Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,389
Empty your tank of the 87 by running it as low as possible. Fill 'er up with premium, do the fuse pull that night, let it sit overnight and then have fun the next morning!
Ringo64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 11:01 AM   #7
steph09
 
steph09's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo64 View Post
Empty your tank of the 87 by running it as low as possible. Fill 'er up with premium, do the fuse pull that night, let it sit overnight and then have fun the next morning!
Dumb question, But I'm assuming I take the fuses out and THEN replace them in the morning right?
steph09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 11:11 AM   #8
~ChipsAhoy~
Shenanigans
 
~ChipsAhoy~'s Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CGM 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 126
Correct.
__________________
2010 CGM 2SS/RS L99
~ChipsAhoy~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 11:31 AM   #9
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableman View Post
No one really knows for sure. My opinion? 10 at the most.
I have to comment on this.

Based on everything I've read around here, and testing done, along with before/after opinions of SS owners who have been on the low octane table the different seems to be MUCH greater than just 10 HP.

It has to be.

Otherwise nobody would ever complain about their car feeling slow or more sluggish on 87 octane versus 93. The whole "well your new SS must feel slow b/c is on the 87 octane table" argument would basically be null and void.

Since a seperate low octane table DOES exist, I'm guessing the difference in power at certain rpms is as much as 25 - 40 HP.

To the OP....yes you are losing performance running on 87 octane.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 11:35 AM   #10
gajagfan


 
gajagfan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1SS 1LE Black - Std Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
I have to comment on this.

Based on everything I've read around here, and testing done, along with before/after opinions of SS owners who have been on the low octane table the different seems to be MUCH greater than just 10 HP.

It has to be.

Otherwise nobody would ever complain about their car feeling slow or more sluggish on 87 octane versus 93. The whole "well your new SS must feel slow b/c is on the 87 octane table" argument would basically be null and void.

Since a seperate low octane table DOES exist, I'm guessing the difference in power at certain rpms is as much as 25 - 40 HP.

To the OP....yes you are losing performance running on 87 octane.
I agree with this. If it is as noticeable as some here have said, it is more 10 hp. Also, from racing and dynoing back in the day, big gains were available when timing was correctly advanced.
gajagfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 12:03 PM   #11
dlluinstra
David
 
dlluinstra's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 LT2 RS Red Jewel Tint
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: E TN
Posts: 129
torque app of timing
dlluinstra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 12:14 PM   #12
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo64 View Post
Empty your tank of the 87 by running it as low as possible. Fill 'er up with premium, do the fuse pull that night, let it sit overnight and then have fun the next morning!
This^
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~ChipsAhoy~ View Post
Correct.
and this.

And it'll be plenty more than 10hp. On the auto's, the rears wouldn't even spin when using 87 octane. SAD!!! After everything was fixed and the ECU cleared, rears spun just fine... that's plenty more than 10hp right there!
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 01:25 PM   #13
cableman
 
Drives: camaro
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: long island
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
I have to comment on this.

Based on everything I've read around here, and testing done, along with before/after opinions of SS owners who have been on the low octane table the different seems to be MUCH greater than just 10 HP.

It has to be.

Otherwise nobody would ever complain about their car feeling slow or more sluggish on 87 octane versus 93. The whole "well your new SS must feel slow b/c is on the 87 octane table" argument would basically be null and void.

Since a seperate low octane table DOES exist, I'm guessing the difference in power at certain rpms is as much as 25 - 40 HP.

To the OP....yes you are losing performance running on 87 octane.
I disagree. Ran 87 for months....tried 93 with fuse pull....felt EXACTLY the same. I don't buy it. I have a 13, maybe they corrected it.
cableman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 01:35 PM   #14
~ChipsAhoy~
Shenanigans
 
~ChipsAhoy~'s Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CGM 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 126
I wish we had 93 octane around here....
__________________
2010 CGM 2SS/RS L99
~ChipsAhoy~ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.