Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2012, 06:48 PM   #29
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
I think it's fair to say, since Ford has resurrected the BOSS, the ONLY Z/28 iteration we're likely to see will be a DIRECT competitor with its "former" playmate...which means an SBC.

...and, carrying that thought a lil further, that may be one very good reason why the ZL1 was named as it was... After all, there are darned few true "secrets" in Motor City...
I do believe so.
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 12:13 AM   #30
CAP'N B
Cajun Mariner
 
CAP'N B's Avatar
 
Drives: 10 Camaro SS/RS 15 Camaro Z/82 AGM
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Real Cajun,Golden Meadow, LA.
Posts: 673
When GM redesigned the SBC into the LT and now the LS engines they had the chance to go with a DOHC engine, but they chose not to. Now they see what the newly designed LS engine can do, why go backwards? I would rather see a TT V8, maybe an aluminum block 4.8 or 5.3TT with direct fuel injection.
__________________
'10 Camaro 2SS/RS Red Jewel VVTLS3/A6
'15Camaro Z/28 Ashen Gray

CAP'N B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 08:18 AM   #31
LOWDOWN
Downright Upright
 
Drives: Daily
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAP'N B View Post
When GM redesigned the SBC into the LT and now the LS engines they had the chance to go with a DOHC engine, but they chose not to. Now they see what the newly designed LS engine can do, why go backwards?
Oh, let's see...

Rev-ability

More power/cu. in., affording eventual smaller engines with equal power and better mpgs

More ECM versatility/tunability, leading to:

Lower Emissions, and...

Better Fuel Economy

Other than that, no real reason...

The bugaboo with "boost" is, when you create those extra horses and "exercise" 'em, they eat a LOT of "hay"...in the REAL world. Ask an owner of an Eco-Boost Ford pickup what they REALLY get for mpgs...

DI will be present in the soon-to-come Gen-5 SBC. In fact by '16, I doubt anyone will have a non-DI engine.
LOWDOWN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 08:34 PM   #32
Richy_Rich
FAVOR
 
Richy_Rich's Avatar
 
Drives: Many Different Rides
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 783
an OHC 302cid would be the berries!
__________________
Please be kind when you drive; thank you.

Last edited by Richy_Rich; 10-11-2012 at 08:36 AM.
Richy_Rich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:19 PM   #33
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
I doubt the 302 would be revived but I wonder why the 5.7L isn't being produced.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 11:37 PM   #34
midnighter
Account Suspended
 
Drives: nothing
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,906
That would have been nice.
midnighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 09:41 AM   #35
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
Oh, let's see...

Rev-ability

More power/cu. in., affording eventual smaller engines with equal power and better mpgs

More ECM versatility/tunability, leading to:

Lower Emissions, and...

Better Fuel Economy

Other than that, no real reason...

The bugaboo with "boost" is, when you create those extra horses and "exercise" 'em, they eat a LOT of "hay"...in the REAL world. Ask an owner of an Eco-Boost Ford pickup what they REALLY get for mpgs...

DI will be present in the soon-to-come Gen-5 SBC. In fact by '16, I doubt anyone will have a non-DI engine.
Buddy of mine has one. Gets around 17 in town and 23 on the highway. pretty much exactly what its supposed to get. BUT, when he drives it hard or is towing he said the mileage does suffer
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 12:10 PM   #36
macalot
 
macalot's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Z/28 + 2015 Z/28
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pittsburgh Area, Pa
Posts: 534
I've had a 302 in the garage since 1973. Time to buy an upgraded version
I can remember back in 1999 or so our Camaro club was invited to the Pittsburgh Vintage Grand Prix to show our cars. It was the first time they allowed American Muscle Cars at the show. Scott/fbodfather brought some vintage Chevies to the show and it is where I met him for the first time. I don't know if he remembers or not, but I had my original '69 Z/28 there. Scott was so intense on discussing the 302 etc at the time. I fired it up for him and as it sat there loping at an idle through the chambered exhaust I swear he was in tears. Needless to say I'm sure he (and the Camaro team) still has the passion for a high reving small block Z/28. In fact he told me at the time that GM had taken a '90s camaro that had been damaged underneath, built a one off 302 and rebuilt the car. I don't know whatever happened to that Camaro, but rest assured I beleive we will have what we want in the next iteration of the Z/28.... it may not be a 302, but I beleive it will be a NA high reving small block of whatever displacement. Keep the faith and save your money!
You gotta the Chevy 302!
macalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 02:07 PM   #37
Richy_Rich
FAVOR
 
Richy_Rich's Avatar
 
Drives: Many Different Rides
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 783
Even an LS3 part#19259233 for a limited run of last year 5th gen Z28s would be balisstic:
525 HP @ 6300 rpm
489 LB-FT @ 4400 rpm


__________________
Please be kind when you drive; thank you.
Richy_Rich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 05:02 PM   #38
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
But is it 50 state smog legal?
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:13 PM   #39
MikeSVX
The magic smoke genie....
 
MikeSVX's Avatar
 
Drives: Jewels (2010 RJT 1SS)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,294
Just because the current engines are based on 5.3 and 6.2 doesn't mean that GM will stick with that. It was that long ago GM motor displacement center around 5.0 (305) and 5.7 (350). You have to remember they need to get better fuel economy. We've been told yes to DI and currently no overhead cam for the next gen engines, but there hasn't been anything released about displacement. GM can drop the displacement and still keep the horse power numbers up with the addition of DI. I can see a 5.0 or 5.3 putting out 425hp. All we know for sure is that the corvette race time is trying out a 5.5L DI race engine in there cars. I thing that's been going on for about a year now.
MikeSVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:32 PM   #40
OldScoolCamaro


 
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
302 DI.....aaaaaah I don't think so......
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
OldScoolCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:35 PM   #41
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldScoolCamaro View Post
302 DI.....aaaaaah I don't think so......
I agree, I don't think we're likely to see a new 302 of any configuration any time soon if ever!
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 09:42 AM   #42
numbr3t
 
Drives: Waiting...
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 58
I think it would be cool if they gave the camaro engine/hp options. I know they have the v6 and v8 now the zl1 which is supercharged but back in the day they sometimes had 4 different v8s to choose from all with different horsepower. It would set certain camaros apart and I would think be very cool.
numbr3t is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM: Arguments for a Spring 2011 Z/28 release! sen10l Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 25 04-10-2011 01:39 PM
PWA "The Lounge" DGthe3 Off-topic Discussions 143773 11-06-2010 11:00 AM
Al Oppenheiser on Z/28..... ShnOmac Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 126 04-29-2010 03:26 AM
The Comaro Betrayed Chevy djljm Off-topic Discussions 36 11-28-2009 08:38 PM
Ford Boss 302 TAG UR IT General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 5 12-09-2006 07:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.