Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2011, 12:50 PM   #1
Smkymts
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro Convertible SS
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 146
Gains of throttle body porting vs 92-102mm???

I need some advice. I have heard a lot of talk about porting throttle bodies and aftermarket TBs. But unable to find direct comparisons of stock Vs Ported stock, stock vs. 92mm vs. 102mm.
Can anyone share Dyno charts or numbers on stock, Ported, 92mm, 102mm on a Supercharged 6.2l LS3?
As a novice, are we talking just the valve/gate opening or actually increasing the TB assembly size?
Bottom line, what Hp gain would I find on LS3 maggie if I had the TB Ported, or swap in a 92mm or a 102mm?

Last edited by Smkymts; 11-19-2011 at 01:21 PM.
Smkymts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 01:00 PM   #2
Ray@RDS
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mn
Posts: 481
The 90mm is a huge restriction! at least for me! 7.0 TVS2300 maggie application, i have a 102mm TPIS throttle body being added to my set-up.
Ray@RDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 03:05 PM   #3
AngelSpeedFreak
Most hated in NM....
 
AngelSpeedFreak's Avatar
 
Drives: Sold the 6POINT2, went to a 50THZ06
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,904
this is probably a very dumb question but.... with a 102mm TB, do you need a different intake tube or will any stock/ aftermarket CIA work?
__________________
AngelSpeedFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 04:37 PM   #4
Hendrix-Engineering
Account Suspended
 
Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smkymts View Post
I need some advice. I have heard a lot of talk about porting throttle bodies and aftermarket TBs. But unable to find direct comparisons of stock Vs Ported stock, stock vs. 92mm vs. 102mm.
Can anyone share Dyno charts or numbers on stock, Ported, 92mm, 102mm on a Supercharged 6.2l LS3?
As a novice, are we talking just the valve/gate opening or actually increasing the TB assembly size?
Bottom line, what Hp gain would I find on LS3 maggie if I had the TB Ported, or swap in a 92mm or a 102mm?
If i was going to make a change i would do our 102 or leave it stock,anything else wouldnt be worth the money imo.Its really simple to put a vacume guage on your snout,if you have vacume you have a restriction,and your losing power.Ive never seen less than 20 rwhp gain with our TBs and ive seen as much as 80 rwhp.the more power you make the more it will add hp.
Hendrix-Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 04:40 PM   #5
Hendrix-Engineering
Account Suspended
 
Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelSpeedFreak View Post
this is probably a very dumb question but.... with a 102mm TB, do you need a different intake tube or will any stock/ aftermarket CIA work?
You can hook our 102 to any intake,but you need a great intake as well to get max hp,we are starting to address that issue after t day.We will have a carbon fiber PowerChamber for the camaro very soon,and maybe a twin 90mm tb setup
Hendrix-Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 05:00 PM   #6
Ray@RDS
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mn
Posts: 481
I agree with hendrix! i have seen almost 3" of vacuum directly behind the tb on a 427 tvs 2300 on the engine dyno. bigger is better for me! I NEED the 102!
Ray@RDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 05:40 PM   #7
Padre
Only drives on Sundays
 
Padre's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC NGray
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 2,500
Thomas, when you say "our TB" is it a NW or other brand, or yours? Just curious. I've got a NW 102 ready for my Procharger build with a FAST 102 LSR manifold. I'm a believer in doing both, though many repeat, "oh the 90mm is fine, it isn't a restriction." I'm thinking my D1 is going to love both.

Padre
__________________

OLD HOTNESS: The "Heretic": '11 2SS/RS L99 A6 Black/Inferno. Build Journal, Videos
D1SC GT9 JBA-LT = 720/680 | 10.330 @ 133.61, 1.546 sixty... Camaro King at ECS V, Darlington.
NEW HOTNESS: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC. Bone Stock, 1/8th: 8.051 @ 89.44, 1.919
Padre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 05:55 PM   #8
Hendrix-Engineering
Account Suspended
 
Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padre View Post
Thomas, when you say "our TB" is it a NW or other brand, or yours? Just curious. I've got a NW 102 ready for my Procharger build with a FAST 102 LSR manifold. I'm a believer in doing both, though many repeat, "oh the 90mm is fine, it isn't a restriction." I'm thinking my D1 is going to love both.

Padre
You have a great TB ,no need to change,you will not see near the gains with a procharger as your air is pushed into the motor.The maggie sucks its air into the motor,it benifits greatly with a bigger TB and intake .We use stock intake and stock tb on T bones 8 second GTO,we could gain a little with a 102 setup ,but not alot.
Hendrix-Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 06:20 PM   #9
Padre
Only drives on Sundays
 
Padre's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC NGray
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 2,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendrix-Engineering View Post
You have a great TB ,no need to change,you will not see near the gains with a procharger as your air is pushed into the motor.The maggie sucks its air into the motor,it benifits greatly with a bigger TB and intake .We use stock intake and stock tb on T bones 8 second GTO,we could gain a little with a 102 setup ,but not alot.
Makes sense, thanks for the info.

Padre
__________________

OLD HOTNESS: The "Heretic": '11 2SS/RS L99 A6 Black/Inferno. Build Journal, Videos
D1SC GT9 JBA-LT = 720/680 | 10.330 @ 133.61, 1.546 sixty... Camaro King at ECS V, Darlington.
NEW HOTNESS: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC. Bone Stock, 1/8th: 8.051 @ 89.44, 1.919
Padre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 08:09 PM   #10
JDP Motorsports
 
JDP Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/ 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sandy, Utah
Posts: 3,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smkymts View Post
I need some advice. I have heard a lot of talk about porting throttle bodies and aftermarket TBs. But unable to find direct comparisons of stock Vs Ported stock, stock vs. 92mm vs. 102mm.
Can anyone share Dyno charts or numbers on stock, Ported, 92mm, 102mm on a Supercharged 6.2l LS3?
As a novice, are we talking just the valve/gate opening or actually increasing the TB assembly size?
Bottom line, what Hp gain would I find on LS3 maggie if I had the TB Ported, or swap in a 92mm or a 102mm?
What boost are you currently running and what boost do you ultimately plan on running? We have a few Maggy/Whipple/ECS cars running the VMAX TB and it is an excellent upgrade at a very reasonable price. I will have some test results from a few of them in the coming months, I just haven't had a chance to do before and after testing with an SC.

On NA applications we see anywhere from 5-8 RWHP and RWTQ but the driveability is greatly improved. The power is much smoother and the throttle response is outstanding. Here is a back to back test we did with the VMAX on a bolt-on 2010 Camaro SS LS3.





On a forced induction application I expect the numbers to be greater but until I test it is simply speculation. I will work on getting this testing done this week if possible and I'll post our results. Please feel free to call, email or PM me anytime with questions.

Kind regards,

Jordan Priestley
888.308.6007
JDP Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 08:12 PM   #11
Whipped416

 
Whipped416's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
on a whipple its about 31 rwhp ... thats tested with the nick williams 102mm
Whipped416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 01:54 AM   #12
Smkymts
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro Convertible SS
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 146
FI test of VMAX TB

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDP Motorsports View Post
What boost are you currently running and what boost do you ultimately plan on running? We have a few Maggy/Whipple/ECS cars running the VMAX TB and it is an excellent upgrade at a very reasonable price. I will have some test results from a few of them in the coming months, I just haven't had a chance to do before and after testing with an SC.

On a forced induction application I expect the numbers to be greater but until I test it is simply speculation. I will work on getting this testing done this week if possible and I'll post our results. Please feel free to call, email or PM me anytime with questions.

Kind regards,

Jordan Priestley
888.308.6007

I only have 6 PSI with peak of 7. But I'll offer up my car as a ginnea pig for a discounted purchase.
Smkymts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 10:44 AM   #13
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,223
Guys, I hope to make this a little easier to understand.

At 6-8 PSI boost I would not expect anything in Peak Power but definitely more response.

As you turn the blower faster Via Pulleys, Meaning More boost Air flow How ever you want to understand it, Eventually the 90mm TB becomes a Restriction.

At that Point if you change to a 102mm You will see an increase in Power.

The Faster your Turning the Blower the Bigger Gains you will see from this Change.

The Slower you Turn the blower the Less gains will be seen

It is Hard to put a Boost Number on it because Headers, Cams, Ported Heads, Cubic inches all affect Boost in relation to blower speed.

I would Say on the Camaro if your Running Smaller than a 3.4 Pulley on a Maggie then you will see Gains.

Those Gain will be larger as you go smaller on the pulley, or add an overdrive crank pulley or overdrive cog Pulley Etc.

At 17 PSI boost we saw 35 RWHP on the Maggie.

At 10 PSI boost on Cammed Headers, LS3 We saw 25 RWHP

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 05:13 PM   #14
2SS\RS
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2ss/rs
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vega
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendrix-Engineering View Post
You can hook our 102 to any intake,but you need a great intake as well to get max hp,we are starting to address that issue after t day.We will have a carbon fiber PowerChamber for the camaro very soon,and maybe a twin 90mm tb setup
Is this 102 mm TB a direct bolt for Maggy's?
2SS\RS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Larger Throttle Body shines Forced Induction - V8 39 09-08-2011 12:18 PM
WTB :Fast 102mm throttle body ls3lsxz V8 - Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons, Tuning Equipment 1 08-28-2011 11:58 AM
Check out this 102MM Nitrous Throttle Body Being Machined! Video Inside! Nick@BVI Forced Induction - V8 1 04-09-2010 12:09 AM
Check out this 102MM Nitrous Throttle Body Being Machined! Video Inside! Nick@BVI Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 1 04-08-2010 11:35 PM
Best method to clean a throttle body on '99 Z Broshot 4th Generation Camaros 5 07-19-2009 11:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.