Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2014, 11:43 AM   #1317
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
Here is the TFLcar review

rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 11:57 AM   #1318
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
It is and it isn't. It won't offer the handling of the new Mustang GT, or even that of the present 1LE. What it will offer is everything else. So depending on your needs it may or may not be. For myself this will most likely be my next vehicle.
Very well put, would all depend on what you need the car for, DD with kids, or a car that is just for the weekend and short trips.
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 12:26 PM   #1319
MEDISIN

 
MEDISIN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
It is and it isn't. It won't offer the handling of the new Mustang GT, or even that of the present 1LE. What it will offer is everything else. So depending on your needs it may or may not be. For myself this will most likely be my next vehicle.
So what is the difference in marketing the R/T Shatpack vs the abruptly discontinued sales flops that were the "SRT Bore" models? They were both around $40k no? Is it the automatic tranny and 15hp that will finally make it a sales success? Furthermore will R/T Shatpack and Hellokitty cannibalize the SRT sales? Seems like all the "would-be" buyers, including yourself, are leaning toward the R/T now (fully realizing the odds of affording a Hellokitty in the next 12 months is beyond the means of 99.999% of the Mopar faithful, bless their hearts).
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft.

"Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree
MEDISIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 12:45 PM   #1320
macwest

 
Drives: 10 Camaro 2SS/RS, 70 Cuda, 71 Cuda
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oakley - Northern California
Posts: 1,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
So what is the difference in marketing the R/T Shatpack vs the abruptly discontinued sales flops that were the "SRT Bore" models? They were both around $40k no? Is it the automatic tranny and 15hp that will finally make it a sales success? Furthermore will R/T Shatpack and Hellokitty cannibalize the SRT sales? Seems like all the "would-be" buyers, including yourself, are leaning toward the R/T now (fully realizing the odds of affording a Hellokitty in the next 12 months is beyond the means of 99.999% of the Mopar faithful, bless their hearts).
Difference with this round is new interior, shaker hood and scat pack option on base model. Won't matter if SRT sales decline because over all sales should increase. However, I suspect the Hellcat will sell over their estimate. Big part to read into what is being said is that the said "will make what is ordered" meaning if more then alloted amount is ordered they will make them. What I believe is trying to be avoided is cars sitting like the viper did or in GM's case the z/28 which currently is sitting in may lots collecting dust.
__________________
"Z28 = first time I bought a new car just to strip parts for my current ride. GM needs to re-think restricted parts. "
macwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 01:23 PM   #1321
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
I think Dodge listened to the guys that were buying their cars, people were asking for the option on the RT to get the 6.4L.
The 6.4L RT is a bit cheaper than the Core (going by comments made by US customers) as the core was no sold in Canada.
Just like back in the 70`s more engine options what is to hate.
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 01:37 PM   #1322
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
So what is the difference in marketing the R/T Shatpack vs the abruptly discontinued sales flops that were the "SRT Bore" models? They were both around $40k no? Is it the automatic tranny and 15hp that will finally make it a sales success? Furthermore will R/T Shatpack and Hellokitty cannibalize the SRT sales? Seems like all the "would-be" buyers, including yourself, are leaning toward the R/T now (fully realizing the odds of affording a Hellokitty in the next 12 months is beyond the means of 99.999% of the Mopar faithful, bless their hearts).
About the same as the ZL1 and GT500 or CTSV are beyond the means of their 99.99% faithful using your extreme logic. I know it hurts but really you should try and control the tears a little
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 01:47 PM   #1323
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
About the same as the ZL1 and GT500 or CTSV are beyond the means of their 99.99% faithful using your extreme logic. I know it hurts but really you should try and control the tears a little
LOL
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 02:10 PM   #1324
4VFTW
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 Mustang GT
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 73
looks like MEDISIN's hate tank is on fumes...hes down to ad hominems at this point.

I'm perfectly ok with Dodge building niche cars for hot rodders...let GM build more V6 Camaros for everyone else.
4VFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:04 PM   #1325
Truck Norris
Thread Mover
 
Truck Norris's Avatar
 
Drives: a Monte Carlo
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sierra Nevada
Posts: 490
I'm now kicking around the idea of a RT 392 Scat Pack manual which someone here said was $37,xxx msrp so knowing how heavily Dodge can discount its vehicles it may be possible to get into a 392 Challenger for $34,xxx.

$35k'ish would be kick ass especially after listening to the vid of Richard Rawlings showing off its "factory dumps" sure it wont be as quick as the 8 speed auto but I will have more fun with the exhaust barking, popping and blurbling every time I shift and can go WOT more often without the risk of speeding. Plus there would be less chance of me getting bored with it especially when taking it to the track. With a (485hp)manual you can always improve on something vs mashing the gas and keeping in straight. I do want to wait and see how the lighter weight 'cuda turns out.
__________________
In the market for something fast
Truck Norris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:14 PM   #1326
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
I believe the difference between the 392 Rt and the SRT8 is the SRT8 gets a version of the Hellcats braking system, the electronic adjustable suspension, a much much better audio system as well as a much more refined and upscale interior.

In many ways the 392 R/T "Scat Pack" get most of the old SRT 8 technology. The new SRT gets a lot of the Hellcat technology
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:22 PM   #1327
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
Essentially what Dodge has done is exactly what we Camaro owners have wanted since 2009, an ls7 option. Except in this case Dodge/ Ma Mopar are not engaging in self destructive and retarded nameplate protection.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:30 PM   #1328
Truck Norris
Thread Mover
 
Truck Norris's Avatar
 
Drives: a Monte Carlo
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sierra Nevada
Posts: 490
^ and a "LS9 option" with their 2.3L TVS'd forged hell cat engine.
__________________
In the market for something fast
Truck Norris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:36 PM   #1329
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
No plans on a Cuda or lighter Challenger till 2018 as far as I know, but if you wait until the hype as had a chance to die you may get a better price. They do discount more than Ford or Chevy has in the past.
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2014, 03:43 PM   #1330
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Essentially what Dodge has done is exactly what we Camaro owners have wanted since 2009, an ls7 option. Except in this case Dodge/ Ma Mopar are not engaging in self destructive and retarded nameplate protection.
I just don`t see having more engine options as a bad thing, everyone has a different idea, some will have no plans to go past the 5.7 on the RT some will want the 6.4L. The guys that go to the SRT 6.4L get more options built into the price, then the Hellcat has it all with only Leather, sunroof and wheels on the option sheet.

GM should take note and change a bit.
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dodge, hellcat, horsepower, srt


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.