Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2012, 06:27 AM   #1
Genob4c
 
Genob4c's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Winchester, KY
Posts: 342
Have we just about peaked with factory HP?

We're at 580HP with the ZL1.

With the new LT1 at 450HP, I'm wondering if factory HP at GM has just about peaked. It's hard for me to imagine factory Camaros with 700HP, but I sure never thought I'd see something like 580HP either. Aren't CAFE ratings getting tighter soon? I'd think they'd have to back off a little at some point.

What's GM's peak?

Thanks,

Geno
__________________
Now: 2015 Z/28

Former:
2013 ZL1 Vert – Crystal Red
1978 Corvette Pace Car
1969 Pace Car
1969 Z/28 – Cortez Silver, 1974 LT/Z28 Blue
1974 Z28 Dark Green , 1976 Camaro Type LT – Black
1980 Z28 – Charcoal, 1981 Z28 – Dark Blue
1981 Z28 – Claret, 1982 Pace Car
1986 IROC – Red, 1993 Z28 – Red
1996 Z28 vert, 1998 Z28 Dk Blue
2002 B4C 2004 Vette – LeMans Blue
2008 Vette - CRT
2011 Camaro Pace Car
Genob4c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 06:40 AM   #2
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
If there were more Camaros sold then yes, it would affect GMs CAFE, however they are not, neither is the 'Vette selling in such numbers that it would affect it.

I personally think that the Camaro will simply lie a little behind the 'Vettes Top Dog when it comes to power.

So if the C7 <whatever they call the top model at the time> gets 700 or 750HP then I don't see why they wouldn't toss 600-650hp in the Camaro <whatever the top dog flavor of the month is> but I don't see them catching up or passing the 'Vette.

But that's only me.

And honestly, the Stang is at 662hp. Why don't you see a Camaro with 700? It's only 38 more than Ford are running right now.

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 06:48 AM   #3
tonyko1
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible, IBM
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,015
The Mustang getting 662HP has to be driving the design team for Corvettes nuts. Hope something is in the works to make them top dog again.
tonyko1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 06:49 AM   #4
Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
I would think that if 450 HP is available NA and that the engine was designed with eventual forced induction in mind, 675 or better should be easily possible without incurring a huge hit against CAFE in a turbocharged version.

Over on the Ford side, I've already heard a rumor or two about Ecoboosted 5.0's (that are almost 450 in their NA trim), and I can't imagine Chevy not responding with something similar. Hopefully for the bowtie faithful they'll do a better job of setting their HP target this time . . .


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:00 AM   #5
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
I bet GM has people scratching their heads, they don't want to fall behind both the Viper and the Stang, which are the two main competitors of the Corvette and Camaro.

So the LT1 has 450hp, and people are questioning one of the vids if they're not already showing an FI engine, which makes perfect sense to be developing from the start.

Right now I'm hearing two words when it comes to "solving" MPG, pollution, etc : Hybrids and Turbos. When people say turbos they mean "with a smaller engine", however people that don't have a Clue(TM) just hear "turbos".

Turbos are a way easier solution to add to an engine than making it a hybrid. And I'm in no way saying one is better than the other or cannot complement each other, because they can.

And yes, while weird, I do see both the Corvette and Camaro eventually becoming hybrids. I bet people are working on it, but they need to get weight down and get some of the other issues of hybrids solved before I see higher performance vehicles becoming hybrids, just like there's a reason the 'Vette didn't get AFM when trucks did, they needed to get it working better. How much better is the LT1's AFM? We'll see I guess.

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:12 AM   #6
davidcroft
Sellin Chevy's since '06
 
davidcroft's Avatar
 
Drives: 18ZL1 02Z-28
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DIRTY SOUFTH
Posts: 1,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blast View Post
If there were more Camaros sold then yes, it would affect GMs CAFE, however they are not, neither is the 'Vette selling in such numbers that it would affect it.
/ Stefan
It's the Silverados, Sierras, Tahoes and Suburbans affecting this. Those are a GM staple!
__________________
'19 Z06-7Speed and lowered on stock bolts
'02 Z28-Kooks true dual headers/TSP heads&cam/full suspension & Kmember sub40K orig miles. https://youtu.be/h6faSdcvNew
TRADED!'17 ATS-V Coupe w/ Carbon Black pkg https://youtu.be/GH_t-R-TJV0
SOLD! '18 ZL1 Mosiac Blk
SOLD!'16 SS Sedan-Forgestars/ARH/rotofab
TRADED!2014 SS Sedan
SOLD! 2013 Blue Ray1SS/1LE 1of20.
TRADED! 2012 White 1SS/RS
davidcroft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:13 AM   #7
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcroft View Post
It's the Silverados, Sierras, Tahoes and Suburbans affecting this. Those are a GM staple!
Exactly

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:14 AM   #8
davidcroft
Sellin Chevy's since '06
 
davidcroft's Avatar
 
Drives: 18ZL1 02Z-28
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DIRTY SOUFTH
Posts: 1,461
To the O.P.

HP numbers are for ricers. Look at the 50 Ft-lbs of TQ increase over the LS3 @2500 RPMs. That's what will whoop up on cars with higher PEAK HP numbers. GM Engineers are very smart
__________________
'19 Z06-7Speed and lowered on stock bolts
'02 Z28-Kooks true dual headers/TSP heads&cam/full suspension & Kmember sub40K orig miles. https://youtu.be/h6faSdcvNew
TRADED!'17 ATS-V Coupe w/ Carbon Black pkg https://youtu.be/GH_t-R-TJV0
SOLD! '18 ZL1 Mosiac Blk
SOLD!'16 SS Sedan-Forgestars/ARH/rotofab
TRADED!2014 SS Sedan
SOLD! 2013 Blue Ray1SS/1LE 1of20.
TRADED! 2012 White 1SS/RS
davidcroft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:15 AM   #9
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
That 450 HP is an "estimate." Common sense says it will be more than that. That's only about 72 HP/L, the same as the LS7. Look around at the HP/L numbers for other DI cars running 11+ CR and you'll see they are at least 10 HP/L higher. The motor is probably capable of 510-520 HP. They may detune it but that means a tune can release a lot of power.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:16 AM   #10
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
I was looking at the TQ curve and I really like that change up to 4k. I mean it's equal to the LS7 there! at 11% smaller displacement.

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:16 AM   #11
meissen
Founder - Michigan FBody
 
meissen's Avatar
 
Drives: 1994 Camaro LT1, 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Haven, MI
Posts: 2,599
I believe they were saying the LT5 (forced induction version of the DI v8 engine) will be more powerful than the ZL1's current engine.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 - "Zooma"
1994 Camaro LT1 A4 - "Red Alert" - v6-to-LT1 Swapped Cruiser; Cammed, Stalled, Enjoyed

"Gone But Not Forgotten"
2016 Camaro 1LT A8 - "Elmo"
2014 Camaro 1LT M6 - "Cherry Bomb"
2012 Camaro 1LS M6 - "Clifford"


Michigan FBody Association
http://www.mifbody.com/
meissen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:18 AM   #12
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
@ meissen: Is that speculation or something GM said?

They posted preliminary TQ curves but I don't believe they've said anything about FI engines at all (apart from people analyzing that vid).

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:20 AM   #13
Genob4c
 
Genob4c's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Winchester, KY
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcroft View Post
To the O.P.

HP numbers are for ricers. Look at the 50 Ft-lbs of TQ increase over the LS3 @2500 RPMs. That's what will whoop up on cars with higher PEAK HP numbers. GM Engineers are very smart

HP numbers are for ricers? That's a little strong. My sig will tell you I'm no ricer. But I agree with you about torque. In general, though, as HP increases, so does torque. HP is the number people look at. I suppose I could have asked have we peaked in torque. Maybe a better question should have been....

Will our cars get stronger?
__________________
Now: 2015 Z/28

Former:
2013 ZL1 Vert – Crystal Red
1978 Corvette Pace Car
1969 Pace Car
1969 Z/28 – Cortez Silver, 1974 LT/Z28 Blue
1974 Z28 Dark Green , 1976 Camaro Type LT – Black
1980 Z28 – Charcoal, 1981 Z28 – Dark Blue
1981 Z28 – Claret, 1982 Pace Car
1986 IROC – Red, 1993 Z28 – Red
1996 Z28 vert, 1998 Z28 Dk Blue
2002 B4C 2004 Vette – LeMans Blue
2008 Vette - CRT
2011 Camaro Pace Car
Genob4c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:22 AM   #14
Blast
 
Drives: 2009 SAAB 9-5 Aero
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genob4c View Post
HP numbers are for ricers? That's a little strong. My sig will tell you I'm no ricer. But I agree with you about torque. In general, though, as HP increases, so does torque. HP is the number people look at. I suppose I could have asked have we peaked in torque. Maybe a better question should have been....

Will our cars get stronger?
That would just have made people think you were talking about structural rigidity or something

// Stefan
Blast is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.