05-14-2010, 05:32 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm everywhere
Posts: 150
|
Back from the dyno... 397whp, 392 torque (barely modified!)
I just got back from a trip to the dyno with my friends, and I've gotta say, I'm impressed. My car put down 397.16 whp, and 392.71 wheel torque!! As of right now, all I have done is a Cold Air Inductions intake, and a muffler delete. Run conditions were 74 degrees with 34% humidity. I was pretty happy with those numbers! I thought I would need headers to crack the 400 mark, but I'm close as it sits now. Can't wait to do a few more mods!
So are these numbers decent considering the light mods I've done??
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS -6M
397whp/393 ft/lbs |
05-14-2010, 05:35 PM | #2 |
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
OMG that is awesome. Congrats!!!
|
05-14-2010, 05:37 PM | #3 |
|
|
05-14-2010, 05:58 PM | #4 |
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
Don't mean to rain on your parade but those are STD numbers. Corrected should bring those numbers down to mid 380's for HP. That is more inline with what you should be running with a CAI. Your muffler delete shouldn't have made much, if any, performance difference.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
05-14-2010, 06:10 PM | #5 | |
H-Town Camaro Club Member
Drives: 17 Hyper Blue Metallic KLR-ZL1 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pearland Tx.
Posts: 2,035
|
Quote:
|
|
05-14-2010, 09:54 PM | #6 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm everywhere
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS -6M
397whp/393 ft/lbs |
|
05-14-2010, 11:00 PM | #7 |
NOICE!!! ™
|
+1
__________________
|
05-14-2010, 11:41 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm everywhere
Posts: 150
|
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS -6M
397whp/393 ft/lbs |
05-15-2010, 12:11 AM | #9 |
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
That's the most important part. Go ahead and slap those headers on and you'll be well over 400whp.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
05-15-2010, 06:52 AM | #10 |
Drives: 10 SIM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,940
|
very good #'s, even if it's STD hp/tq. Much cooler weather than when I ran though at 96 degrees! Chevy must have added some juice to yours
I'm at 384 with catback and cai, so I'd be real happy with your #s. congrats!
__________________
5th Gen Camaros of the Carolinas SIM, 2SS/RS LS3 5/7/11 453.9 RWHP 427.5 RWTQ
VMS Stage 2.5 Comp Cams kit, Cold Air Inductions intake, ADM race scoop, DT 1 3/4" headers, Solo cats, 3" Magnaflow catback, Pypes cutouts, HP tune, H&R SuperSport springs, Eibach sways/spacers, TexasSpeed UD pulley, LSR tensioner pulley, Barton shifter, skip shift eliminator, powder-coated calipers, R1 concept rotors, StopTech pads, Granatelli wires, Lloyds mats, tint, AAC afterburner taillamps, AAC scanner/sidemarkers, SRP pedals, custom engine cover, black bowties, Ridergraphix hood spears.... |
05-15-2010, 12:11 PM | #11 | |
|
Quote:
1 7/8 if you go with forced induction (supercharger, turbocharger). 1 7/8 actually show's a loss in torque if left with a setup like cai/headers/catback. 1 3/4 = no loss |
|
05-15-2010, 12:13 PM | #12 |
|
nice numbers!!
|
05-15-2010, 08:29 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm everywhere
Posts: 150
|
Nice! Looks like 1 3/4 might be with way to go for me then because I plan on keeping it all NA. I will probably have to wait awhile on the cam until I can get a daily driver. :( I don't want to completely destroy mileage until then. LOL.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS -6M
397whp/393 ft/lbs |
05-16-2010, 10:33 AM | #14 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
This has been proved incorrect by many dyno tests. You can do a seach for Jannettys header test for more details. From Jannetty's test: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...header+testing Our Test Car is none other than, Bigdogs LS3 Camaro used in our CAI test. This Car is 100% Stock other than the Headers installed for the Testing. Stock Peak Numbers 373 RWHP 378 RWTQ Stock Average Numbers I will post tomorow Forgot to print them. 1.75 long tube headers w high flow cats Peak 401.1 HP 403.8 TQ 1.75 long tube headers w high flow cats Average 281.2 HP 363.9 TQ 1.875 long tube headers w high flow cats Peak 406.8 HP 407.5 TQ 1.875 long tube headers w high flow cats Average 283.7 HP 366.6 TQ 2.0 long tube headers w high flow cats Peak 411.7 HP 408.9 TQ 2.0 long tube headers w high flow cats Average 288.1 HP 368.1 TQ The 1 3/4 Headers did Surprisingly well. The 1 7/8 Headers IMO are the best all around header. The 2.0 Headers are neck and neck with the 1 7/8 but Slightly stronger from 5000 to 6300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Roto-fab CAI dyno results | Roto-fab 1 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 102 | 07-30-2016 07:21 PM |
Torque Converters | CamaroSpike23 | V8 and V6 Transmissions / Driveline (6L80 / 6L50 / TR6060 / AY6) | 48 | 08-16-2014 02:07 AM |
Cam Headers Intake Tune 446 RWHP 430 RWTQ | JANNETTYRACING | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 72 | 11-25-2009 03:09 PM |
SGOS's - L99 A6 Dyno results (after dyno tune) | SGOS252382 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 48 | 07-27-2009 01:13 PM |
09 Mustang GT and 09 Challenger R/T test drives | CamaroSpike23 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 19 | 04-10-2009 04:27 PM |