Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2012, 05:31 AM   #57
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
Well sure but so does larger intake and exhaust valves and a redesigned combustion chamber.
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 01:07 PM   #58
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
Well sure but so does larger intake and exhaust valves and a redesigned combustion chamber.
So if GM and Ford DOHC engines are puttin out around 90 HP/L N/A and DOHC is not the key, then why don't GM push rod motors come close? The Road Runner in the BOSS puts out 88.8 HP/L. Scale that to 7.0L like the LS7 and it's putting out 622 HP. That puts it in LS9 territory and blows the almighty LS7 out of the water.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 03:38 PM   #59
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
that is a good question..ever heard of a mighty mouse?? With a bunch of different combos, you can get 400 HP out of an old small block checy 350! Its been done a billion times. Difference is, Automakers worry about reliability, MPG, emissions and all that crap. With a push rod motor, you are limited in the valve size by what fits in the bore and only having 1 cam eliminates the possibility ov having more than 2 valves per cylinder. If you are building your own motor, you can put as big a lift cam as you want and don't have to give two hoots about MPG, CAFE bla blah bla
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 05:43 PM   #60
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
that is a good question..ever heard of a mighty mouse?? With a bunch of different combos, you can get 400 HP out of an old small block checy 350! Its been done a billion times. Difference is, Automakers worry about reliability, MPG, emissions and all that crap. With a push rod motor, you are limited in the valve size by what fits in the bore and only having 1 cam eliminates the possibility ov having more than 2 valves per cylinder. If you are building your own motor, you can put as big a lift cam as you want and don't have to give two hoots about MPG, CAFE bla blah bla
I'm talking about automakers who have to make reliable engines and follow CARB rules.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:06 PM   #61
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
that is a good question..ever heard of a mighty mouse?? With a bunch of different combos, you can get 400 HP out of an old small block checy 350! Its been done a billion times. Difference is, Automakers worry about reliability, MPG, emissions and all that crap. With a push rod motor, you are limited in the valve size by what fits in the bore and only having 1 cam eliminates the possibility ov having more than 2 valves per cylinder. If you are building your own motor, you can put as big a lift cam as you want and don't have to give two hoots about MPG, CAFE bla blah bla
Actually 400 HP out of a 350 is pretty conservative. Super Chevy detailed a 302 cid build in March 2009 that produced 458 torque @ 5,600 rpm and 534 hp @ 6,700 rpm on the dyno. And it should be noted that it was a very custom build that no manufacturer would be willing to produce for a production vehicle due to reliability issues and the inability to pass emissions standards.
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:42 PM   #62
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildpaws View Post
Actually 400 HP out of a 350 is pretty conservative. Super Chevy detailed a 302 cid build in March 2009 that produced 458 torque @ 5,600 rpm and 534 hp @ 6,700 rpm on the dyno. And it should be noted that it was a very custom build that no manufacturer would be willing to produce for a production vehicle due to reliability issues and the inability to pass emissions standards.
Clyde
I bet it had a nice lope.
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 07:00 PM   #63
OldScoolCamaro


 
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
^...and it smelled real nice too....ahhhh those fumes on race gas....
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
OldScoolCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 07:41 PM   #64
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cnd chance View Post
I bet it had a nice lope.
And I miss that lope in today's performance cars! Though that one clip of the L28 pulling up and then backing up, sounded like that LS7 had a nice lope.
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2012, 11:09 PM   #65
OldScoolCamaro


 
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildpaws View Post
And I miss that lope in today's performance cars! Though that one clip of the L28 pulling up and then backing up, sounded like that LS7 had a nice lope.
Clyde
...yes Clyde, unfortunately we still have to go outlaw to maximize the engines,,,,to get that performance beyond EPA reg's.....with cam overlaps, and the additional performance upgrades....but that is high performance Nirvana. And we have to throw out warranties to do so. The days of yonder we miss, we shall never see again.
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
OldScoolCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 08:44 PM   #66
htron50


 
htron50's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 Status "Thank You!"
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 2,498
Somehow, the sound of the ZL1, over the last 6 months, has displaced the ol' lumpy sounds of yore, with a new radically deep and sporadically popping and groaning that remains worthy of carrying the Muscle Car flag. Take a current LSA and pop it in a 69 Camaro with pipes. How might the new sounds feel in the older car in your opinions?
htron50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 08:53 PM   #67
OldScoolCamaro


 
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
....hmmmm....honestly, for me, just sayin, I'd rather do up a first gen small block from scratch, get out my old tools, and do up something nostalgic, but in newer N/A terms, using old school methods with the more up to date parts available now. I wouldn't do an upgraded plug and play new motor. That's likely because my hands on experience ended in the mid 80's. But, retro mods are cool too!
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
OldScoolCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM: Arguments for a Spring 2011 Z/28 release! sen10l Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 25 04-10-2011 01:39 PM
PWA "The Lounge" DGthe3 Off-topic Discussions 143773 11-06-2010 11:00 AM
Al Oppenheiser on Z/28..... ShnOmac Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 126 04-29-2010 03:26 AM
The Comaro Betrayed Chevy djljm Off-topic Discussions 36 11-28-2009 08:38 PM
Ford Boss 302 TAG UR IT General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 5 12-09-2006 07:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.