Lingenfelter modified ZL-1 Runs 11.03@130

[Nmbr1gmfan]

This Yeller car had a cam swap.

[2010 SSRS]

Originally Posted by peteypab2133

If it is so easy then why was it not accomplished? nice times though!

Hey, where are you, 10 second runs were easily accomplished like I said they would

[hognutz]

I am going to say the red car is probabaly the 650hp package and the yellow car is the 700hp package.

that would be my guess. of course the ford people will say these times suck but 10.75@134 in a 4120lb car is moving out.

[2cnd chance]

Originally Posted by hognutz

I am going to say the red car is probabaly the 650hp package and the yellow car is the 700hp package.

that would be my guess. of course the ford people will say these times suck but 10.75@134 in a 4120lb car is moving out.

Don't care what "they" say, that there IS quick!

[Fenderaddict2]

Originally Posted by 2cnd chance

It's the constant regurgitation of the SAME nonsense speculation that is OVERLY annoying!

Better this than the old, "Mustang verses...oh, where did the Camaro go?"

[Fenderaddict2]

Originally Posted by nthimage

Followed by another run



info is on the posted here
-Isaac

Nicely done.

[Camarowguy]

Originally Posted by Thyshallsmite

gt500 2013 is about 400-500lbs lighter with race seats (an dealer option on the car) straight line zl1 will get smoked, mustang still ulgy though :P lol. If zl1 will need about 50-100 more hp to haul that extra weight and beat the 2013 gt500, soo 2014 we can bite back maybe? Big advantage of camaro though is that huge engine bay, so might as well get a LSX454 in there

Ummm. I'm just wondering....do you realize the lsx454 gets its extra cubes from a bigger bore and longer stroke. So, the engine bay really makes no difference in that as the external dimensions stay the same. Just an FYI.

[Paco]

Originally Posted by Pgoldston

No they just get over rated IE 2001 Cobras

It was actually 1999 Cobras. It was a production error. Once it was corrected, they made a bit more than 320hp. 2001's never had this problem

Originally Posted by RLHMARINES

That's because GM didn't lie to you about the GTO's horse power rating at the crank unlike Ford did and they got caught doing it, that's something to never forget. They had to "Save Face" somehow, and what better way than to underrate the supercharged cobra's hp rating to make it easier to forget their past false advertising and betrayal of consumer trust.

344 rwhp sounds about normal for a crank rating of 400 hp, of course that's really based on doing the dyno run with the proper correction factors.

They didn't lie, it was a production error in the manifold, which they performed a recall for. They also put on a updated cat-back. Ford actually handled the whole ordeal quite well