05-19-2012, 12:49 AM | #491 |
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cranberry Township, PA
Posts: 1,098
|
I have to side with you all, the SRA is better for drag racing, but that is not to say one cannot beef up an IRS and make it drag competitive.
Just the same goes to, one can build up a SRA and make it road course worthy. |
05-19-2012, 03:44 AM | #492 |
UNION MADE
Drives: 2011 inferno orange SSRS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nassau county
Posts: 157
|
The track gives lessons? Face palm my balls kenny! You hillbilly! You should do some research like,read a book or something.typically there is about a 150lb weight difference between the two
|
05-19-2012, 09:35 AM | #493 |
Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Hey Kenny...FYI...I do have a bit of track time under my belt...just sayin.
That said, the very first mod that I did to my 99 Cobra and my 04 Cobra was to swap the IRS for a live axle - due to weight and breakage issues (breakage = dollars)....not because the IRS couldn't hook as well (or better). |
05-19-2012, 10:11 AM | #494 |
Banned
Drives: 2006 Duramax Join Date: May 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 20
|
The weight is completely irrelevant, COPO's or any other "class specific" cars have a minimum weight to compete anyways. Any serious race car is packed with ballast to get the weight up to where it needs to be. I guess OL 10.5 and ODR cars will all be switching over to an IRS setup soon. Thanks for the enlightenment. And Bob, I never said YOU didn't go to the track, but people SRA their cobras for a reason, and it wasn't to save weight. As you are fully aware.
|
05-19-2012, 04:20 PM | #495 |
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
There is a simple fact of mechanics involved in the COPO decision to run a solid rear end vs. an IRS. A solid rear is cheaper, stronger and is more easily repaired on a shorter notice when there is a breakage (not if).
The benchmark for drag rear ends, the Ford 9", especially those with 31+ spline axles and well built third members can easily withstand 2000+ HP on very sticky tires for roughly 3,500 bucks. An IRS, to be built to withstand that power, would be considerably heavier and much more expensive. The COPO Camaro drag car uses a Strange Engineering S-9 rear end, which is based on the Ford 9" unit. GM knew an IRS could not be realistically built that was still affordable to put in the COPO. Simply put, any IRS is inferior in performance, durability and price to a solid rear end for drag racing. This isnt a Ford vs. Chevy, Mustang Vs. Camaro thing, its just reality that isnt bound to brand loyalty. |
05-19-2012, 05:15 PM | #496 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
And as for the Camaro fanboys comment, you are on CAMARO 5. Not mustang 5. I think your advanced reading skills should let you understand what I mean when I say that. |
|
05-19-2012, 07:15 PM | #497 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
|
05-19-2012, 07:27 PM | #498 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
|
|
05-19-2012, 08:55 PM | #499 | |
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cranberry Township, PA
Posts: 1,098
|
Quote:
Since you were still upset with the noise, you traded it in. It's America, you can choose to do whatever you want, but no need to lie about what happened when you've posted the true story on multiple places but come on here trying to save face. Instead, you're sitting here hurling insults at people, then as soon as they reply to you, immediately run behind the "stop attacking me" card, or the "this is a Camaro site, so please do not correct me on Mustangs, even though I will say whatever inaccurate informaiton I want, since I own a Camaro" Wow, a 13.3 @ 113... even my wife who has never taken a car down the track before got hers to go 12.5 bone stock in her 3.31/MT82 Premium car. It's the car's fault, not yours. You don't say, so you went to the drag strip, you think you broke your trans, but figured since you ran crappy times you wanted Ford to foot your hot rodding bill. You also bought your car used but, have no idea what the previous owner did to your car, but it's still Ford's fault because "their car sucks". Especially because they denied your modded car that had powertrain mods, a warranty claim. but wait a minute, Ford did work on your transmission, and when you accepted it back, it did feel acceptable to you, until "YOU" started to drive it again. The engine noises, are what Ford would not warranty since you probably did the intake manifold install incorrectly. So instead of trying to locate your own self imposed issues, you immediately looked for an automatic GT Mustang to trade in, but since it was in February they were doing the model year changeover so inventory was at a low for new, this of course is immediately Ford's fault that you couldn't find an automatic GT Mustang to your liking during that time frame, so you figured may as well trade it in. It's your money, you do what you want, but coming on here acting like a badass and that your car broke, and the transmission is junk was a flat out lie. In fact, I don't think anyone should take anything you say about the MT82 with any credit whatsoever. Feel free and see how childish his responses were over there as well, when people started to correct his incorrect info http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74203 I especially like how you tell everyone, it was none of our damn business, yet you shared the story with the entire forum looking for feedback. Did not like the responses so you took your ball and ran home. Last edited by Seer; 05-19-2012 at 09:18 PM. |
|
05-19-2012, 10:53 PM | #500 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
Yep that's me. I'm also on WOTmustangs and HPJ as well. Oh and RWHP. My responses were made to people like you that didn't want to believe that ford would put a shitty part in their favorite car. They wanted to hear none of it. And as for the install that was professionally done and I went over it myself twice before I left the installer. And did so again when I heard the noise later at the dealership. The aftermarket parts didn't cause my trans to fail. Nor did my driving considering how often I have taken all my other cars to the track, including my '07 GT. Only thing ever went wrong with that car was the rear end lost a bearing. And that wasn't even because of the track runs I made. That was a friend of mine driving it a bit too hard without my knowledge. No such friends drove my '11. And my driving at the track didn't break anything. Maybe made some previous problems more prevalent, considering how the trans had already been opened prior to my owning it, yet ford showed no service record for my vehicle requiring trans work. You can think what you want, that trans was bad before I ever messed with it. I'm still curious about what that engine noise was though...
Quote:
|
|
05-19-2012, 10:59 PM | #501 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
Oh and btw, they replaced numerous bearing inside the trans. So yeah there was something wrong with it. Problem is, they didn't fix the actual gears that were whining and the problem was still there when I went to pick the car up. It was just quieted down by the new fluid and parts. Gave it about 150 miles and the whining was right back there again. They shoulda replaced the trans but didn't. They wanted to band-aid it.
|
05-19-2012, 11:01 PM | #502 |
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cranberry Township, PA
Posts: 1,098
|
Your trans did not fail man. The mt82 makes noise, that's how it is. It's a tight ratio performance oriented transmission.
You can get rid of a car for any reason you like but don't lie about it. |
05-19-2012, 11:16 PM | #503 |
Banned
Drives: Ms. Daisy Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nashville,Tn
Posts: 400
|
|
05-20-2012, 06:42 AM | #504 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beaufort, NC
Posts: 1,383
|
So the MT-82 sounds like a loud supercharger? I don't think so. The trans was getting ready to go. Whoever has it now is probably still having issues with it. I got rid of the car because of the trans issue and the engine noise. I'm not lying about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2011 5.0 vs 2012 45th SS | Deki | Chevy Camaro vs... | 26 | 12-05-2012 01:16 PM |
5.0 vs 5th gen SS/RS road course times... | Coyotekiller | Chevy Camaro vs... | 24 | 03-23-2012 11:52 PM |
Beat the Heat Camaro Meet - August 28th | iluvmy67camaro | USA - Southeast | 0 | 08-06-2010 11:04 AM |
2010 SS vs 5.0 vs 335I | BADNESS | Chevy Camaro vs... | 4 | 07-06-2010 08:46 PM |
Hmmmm. Audi insider claims the R8 V10 will beat the ZR1 around the 'Ring | ihc95 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 08-13-2008 01:47 PM |