09-19-2013, 10:06 PM | #43 | |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
Quote:
|
|
09-19-2013, 11:03 PM | #44 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
09-20-2013, 06:33 AM | #45 |
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
Bluebeastsrt........Internet glory runs happen in atco with a crazy - 2700 da... I belive it was a 12.5 or 12.6 on a bone stock 6.1. I have never raced on a negative da here in florida.. is it really that hard for you to believe my stock averages were 13.0-13.3, added a tune, cai, exhaust and ran 12.7 best with averages 12.8-12.9... really that is so far fetched? .. this is my 2nd srt, so acoording to you I have factory freaks? Lol
Last time I posted a video of my stock 6.1 and srt8techs 392 all the excuses of hidden mods came out....I'm not going to go back and forth will you cherry picking vids....I'm going off owning 2 of the cars and being around the platform since 2009...
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE |
09-20-2013, 07:15 AM | #46 |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
My friend has an srt8 charger 2006 with intake/programmer/cat deletes and he just bought a 2012 6 speed 5.0 manual.... He owns both but had a driver mod in his new 5.0, needless to say the srt8 pulled a car on the airstrip.
His srt8 did 13.1 @ 111 mph. |
09-20-2013, 12:47 PM | #47 | ||
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
Here you go.... cherry pick bone stock from 2005. do you need more? What was the da when you ran 12.8? Tunes and bolt on wake up your cars better than the 6.1
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE Last edited by 07-SRT; 09-20-2013 at 12:58 PM. |
||
09-20-2013, 01:34 PM | #48 |
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
2005 was the first year. There was no tunes or aftermarket parts yet. ..My friend has an ls3 ss.... we will compare times same day, track and da.... Like I said the da was - 2700 on that vid in atco...
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE |
09-20-2013, 03:04 PM | #49 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro (M6) 1000+ HP SBE Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,391
|
Quote:
__________________
F-1X, Cog Drive, ATI Super Pulley/Sprag ~ 19 psi
Blower Cam Brodix BP BR 3 Heads Kooks LT Headers and full 3" exhaust Fore Triple Pump Fuel System with ID 1700X Injectors - E85 conversion DSS 9” Conversion (1400 hp axles, driveshaft, pumpkin) & Strange 3.70 gears McLeod RXT Twin HD Clutch & Upgraded Slave RPM Level VII TR6060 BMR Drag Suspension Package w/Strange shocks Carlyle 15" and M/T ET Street R radials 10.1 @ 143 mph 1/4 mile |
|
09-20-2013, 07:13 PM | #50 | |
Drives: 2013 Ram Express Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
|
Quote:
|
|
09-20-2013, 08:18 PM | #51 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
09-20-2013, 09:02 PM | #52 | |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
Does your car have a gearing advantage on a LS3 SS? Excuse the ignorance but I am not super familiar with the srt cars. For what reason other than traction would your car be as fast as a car that makes virtually the same or better power and a few hundred pounds lighter? Why go back and forth with all the videos/he said she said, blah blah blah. If it isnt geared considerably better stock for stock it is impossible for the srt to be faster...any instance in which the outcome is different is just a result of variables encountered in the real world. The cars are close yes...but I would say the srt is as far behind the ss as the ss is behind the 5.0. A couple ticks. Which would also add up perfectly as each of these models were brought to the market to beat the others in succession. Chevy would not have made the ls3 camaro if it couldnt beat the dodge and ford at the time. Ford would not have made the mustang if it could not have beat the chevy at the time. And now we have the 392..is that not faster than the ls3 and the 6.1 srt? of coarse it is. Its power to weight ratio is superior. In the end the cars are close enough that we have these arguments. But the reality is that in perfect conditions if everything could be done 100% fair and equal across the board it goes 5.0>ls3>srt BTW...I would be very surprised if your friend with a manual tranny could match your automatic car most of the time. Much harder to run as fast and as conistent with the manual. But that doesnt mean your car is faster technically. |
|
09-20-2013, 10:06 PM | #53 |
SRT and SS
Drives: 08' Jeep SRT8 / 13' 2SS Conv. Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 209
|
|
09-21-2013, 11:16 AM | #54 | |
Drives: 2011 2ss/rs Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Jacksonville, fl
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
I am the friend he is referring too and i just have been with him to the track with his srt, running him in my srt at the time. And aside from him being a DAMN good driver. I have seen his car running consistant 13.0's in the florida heat. Then he went and bought another one and was running the same numbers. I actually did think he had a factory freak until he did it with the super bee and that was with both cars bone stock. Best i could muster was 13.3 stock i believe. id have to dig up a run to post to verify I would agree that maybe time wise the stock srt would be closer to an automatic camaro, but thats based purely on weight. the srt weighs 4300 plus driver and to even be able to be compared is a feat in itself to me personally. so i would not compare the stock engine times when there is such a big weight difference. so what you are saying is if you swapped the l99 into a charger it would still run the same numbers as a 6.1. I dont think so. The ls3 would have to be swapped over to come close to equalling out. The stock srt also comes with a 3.06 gear for those asking. Idk if id wanna go up on gearing in a srt cause they dont have the luxury of the 6th gear as we do. they eat it on gas mileage. The one thing i can say for the ls3 is i love how much power small mods make on these engines (headers for example). i would definitely have had to spend cosiderably more on the hemi just to make the power of a cam swap (headers and tune of course). I know i will probably get flamed for "taking up" for a dodge guy, but ive owned every american make and have enjoyed different aspects of each. ive seen big block chevy "back half" cars keep up with pro mods, seen a n/a 6.1 hemi with cam and headers with serious weight reduction running 10's, and small block ford motors destroy big blocks. idk y people get so wrapped up in which is so much better when all can be made to be super badass |
|
09-21-2013, 11:38 AM | #55 | |
Drives: 2011 2ss/rs Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Jacksonville, fl
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
i like these comments that is y i cannot concede that the 6.1 engine is that much slower than the other engines. With the weight and real world conditions i would agree. Also we just had a new track open today as a matter of fact. hes probably there now, but im stuck here at work talking to you knuckleheads. Lol Hopefully we can get there together between tomoro and next weekend and ill try to be as consistant as possible to "drag his ass" lol |
|
09-21-2013, 12:00 PM | #56 | |
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
Like you, I have owned the big 3 just happens to be Mopar at the moment. .. I want check out your new ride and run them before you mod. My stuff still in the garage..lol When you thinking of going? Get the GoPro ready.........
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|