Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2009, 09:49 PM   #15
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cnd chance View Post


the old Z's had very good torque it was just at higher rev's.
You got it right, but I think it would be nice to have some low end torque, it got old very quickly always having to keep the revs up to stay in the torque/HP band in my '69 Z/28.
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 10:00 PM   #16
2SSRS@Gen5diy
 
2SSRS@Gen5diy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
Nice find.
2SSRS@Gen5diy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 11:40 PM   #17
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
I think the Corvette C7 in 2012 will utilize direct injection GenV engines, and this could coincide with the Z28 launch.
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge

General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer

STANDARD DISCLAIMER
camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever,
whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 07:37 AM   #18
rayhawk

 
rayhawk's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,060
So are they going to have to make a GT3 class once the corvette begins to dominate GT2? I can't wait to see what kind of changes are in store for the Gen V motors. Although I must say with the weight of cars now and the success GM has had with somewhat larger displacement engines, I don't see them going smaller (even if it is DI) for the Camaro and Corvette. I guess we will have to wait and see, but I think a 6.2L DI motor is the future of the Camaro SS.
__________________
rayhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 09:31 AM   #19
SSmoked

 
SSmoked's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1 #1255
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 1,279
interesting. anybody know the hp/tq limitations to the gt2/3 class that this motor will be in? this would probly give us a rough estimate of what the vette/z28 will get.
i like the idea of a screaming small block v8. make this gen V 5.5L a 450hp/450tq monster and ill be happy. toss into into the Z with beefed up suspension and we have a winner.
__________________
SSmoked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 09:42 AM   #20
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSOOCH View Post
I like the idea. Just like 1969. The SS will have the bigger motor. Not necessarily faster though.
Umm, sorta...the 302 should take the base SS 396 engine (325hp), and could hang with the small block SS engine (350/300hp) or the 396/350hp, but the 396/375hp would WALK IT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cnd chance View Post


the old Z's had very good torque it was just at higher rev's.
There wasn't squat for torque in the 302s...you're talking an oversquare small block using the 283s short crank. IIRC, it was rated at 290hp/290tq, with the torque rating coming waaaay up in the rpm range, like in the 4k range...the 302 made it's name by revving up high, but nothing down low. Actually, the best Z28 engine of that era was the LT1 of 1970...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 09:53 AM   #21
cliffy
Chevy Power Forever
 
cliffy's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Dusk Blue Z/28, 2015 Red Z/28
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Flagstaff AZ
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy454 View Post
Umm, sorta...the 302 should take the base SS 396 engine (325hp), and could hang with the small block SS engine (350/300hp) or the 396/350hp, but the 396/375hp would WALK IT.


There wasn't squat for torque in the 302s...you're talking an oversquare small block using the 283s short crank. IIRC, it was rated at 290hp/290tq, with the torque rating coming waaaay up in the rpm range, like in the 4k range...the 302 made it's name by revving up high, but nothing down low. Actually, the best Z28 engine of that era was the LT1 of 1970...
The lack of torque and the love of free spinning revs is why most of those beloved motors grenaded, but oh what a motor it was. It was a true factory "hotrod" motor. 396 motors were turds in comparison except the 375 versions
__________________
Cliffy
cliffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:03 AM   #22
JBsC6
 
Drives: 2008 Blk C6 Z51 NPP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 255
Why would we want a 5.5 liter motor when GM could just put direct injection on the LS3 or L99 and we'd get more power, more tq, better emissions and fuel economy..?

I don't see the benefit of a 5.5 liter motor compared to the 6.2

JMO
__________________
2008 Blk C6 Z51 NPP M6/2008 Silver CTS AWD FE2 304hp
JBsC6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:24 AM   #23
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,198
Interesting. I don't see GM engineering new engines without DI though, and unless this 5.5 liter comes with it, I don't really see if making it to Camaro. Also, the LSA and LS9 are too new, to me, for them to get rid of already, even if I look forward to 2012. I wouldn't see GM getting rid of those with new replacement engines until after 2015. There are only a couple engines I can recall that GM made in really limited numbers for a year or two and it just doesn't make sense they'd do that now. I could be way off though. As long as the power goes up, and not down, and it retains eight cylinders, I don't care too much
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:45 AM   #24
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSOOCH View Post
I like the idea. Just like 1969. The SS will have the bigger motor. Not necessarily faster though.
shhhh.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
Interesting. I don't see GM engineering new engines without DI though, and unless this 5.5 liter comes with it, I don't really see if making it to Camaro. Also, the LSA and LS9 are too new, to me, for them to get rid of already, even if I look forward to 2012. I wouldn't see GM getting rid of those with new replacement engines until after 2015. There are only a couple engines I can recall that GM made in really limited numbers for a year or two and it just doesn't make sense they'd do that now. I could be way off though. As long as the power goes up, and not down, and it retains eight cylinders, I don't care too much

well, if it proves viable enough to use for a Z28 opposed to an FI motor to keep with the roots of the Z28. 500-550 n/a p DI 5.5L v8.... I'd take it.

but, I think the LSA is almost a surefire bet for the Z28. mainly because they've already been building the motor for how long now? compared to a 5.5 that hasnt yet made it to full production.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:03 PM   #25
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBsC6 View Post
Why would we want a 5.5 liter motor when GM could just put direct injection on the LS3 or L99 and we'd get more power, more tq, better emissions and fuel economy..?

I don't see the benefit of a 5.5 liter motor compared to the 6.2

JMO
Wave of the future, smaller, better fuel mileage. I'm expecting a D.I. V8, 335 cubic inch?
I wouldn't be surprised if the new motors have comparable hp/torque numbers to the motors they replace.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:05 PM   #26
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,198
I'd like to keep with more traditional cars, but I always come back to Z28 needing a good amount more power in order to make a performance difference above SS. Shoot, another only 25 some-odd-horse and maybe a couple hundred pounds off an SS just won't do it for me. It still won't compete with a GT500 (again, I always come back to this in my mind), so I just keep falling back on LSA. Sheesh - this is frustrating to wait to get information on, but kinda' fun at the same time
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:33 PM   #27
ShnOmac


 
ShnOmac's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
Here is a different twist.... What if the new 5.5 Liter is not going to go into the Z/28 but going into the SS to one up the new Mustang.... hmmmmm

Last edited by ShnOmac; 10-29-2009 at 02:12 PM.
ShnOmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 12:44 PM   #28
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCamaro69 View Post
Wave of the future, smaller, better fuel mileage. I'm expecting a D.I. V8, 335 cubic inch?
I wouldn't be surprised if the new motors have comparable hp/torque numbers to the motors they replace.

what about more hp/tq than the motors they replace?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShnOmac View Post
Here is a different twist.... What if the new 5.5 Liter is not going to go into the Z/28 but go into the SS to one up the new Mustang.... hmmmmm
dont see that happening till a Gen 6 comes out. mainly because of the trials that they have to do before sending the car into production.

instead of testing two new powertrain options for a Z28 (one for auto, one for manual), they would have to test 4 (2 for the SS and 2 for the Z). it gets expensive and I dont see GM doing that right now.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PWA "The Lounge" DGthe3 Off-topic Discussions 143773 11-06-2010 11:00 AM
4-Sale 2001 Z/28 Show Car A4, t-tops 01pewterz28 Autos For Sale / Wanted 10 08-12-2010 08:26 AM
Al Oppenheiser on Z/28..... ShnOmac Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 126 04-29-2010 03:26 AM
My theory about the Z/28 GM4lyfe Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 36 09-30-2009 06:39 PM
2011 Z/28 Camaro "Reality" IROCZJEFF 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 55 09-16-2008 12:55 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.