Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2013, 12:23 PM   #1
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Tuning JANNETTY RACING built Transformers for C-16

We have the JRE built Transformers car here for some more updates and tuning and decided it was time to move to a different fuel so we switched to C-16 from the MS-109

The results were Pretty impressive we picked up 105 RWHP.

This is a LPE 427 with JRE Cam 2 inch headers YSI supercharger ID-1000 injectors and an ATI Powerglide Transmission at 20 PSI boost.

Previously 1017 RWHP with a Manual Trans

Then 901 RWHP With the switch to the Powerglide ( autos without Lock up converter always show lower Power on the chassis dyno)

With the C-16 in the tank and a few strokes of the key board we are happy to report 1006 RWHP.
Attached Images
 
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com

Last edited by JANNETTYRACING; 12-10-2014 at 10:59 AM.
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 02:31 PM   #2
VanquisherSS
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
 
Drives: CTS-V Coupe, 04 TT Viper
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,561
Boost only? What about on spray with the direct port?
VanquisherSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 03:07 PM   #3
Boost6924
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Indianapolis,IN
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
We have the JRE built Transformers car here for some more updates and tuning and decided it was time to move to a different fuel so we switched to C-16 from the MS-109

The results were Pretty impressive we picked up 105 RWHP.

This is a LPE 427 with JRE Cam 2 inch headers YSI supercharger ID-1000 injectors and an ATI Powerglide Transmission at 20 PSI boost.

Previously 1017 RWHP with a Manual Trans

Then 901 RWHP With the switch to the Powerglide ( autos always show lower
Power on the chassis dyno)

With the C-16 in the tank and a few strokes of the key board we are happy to report 1006 RWHP.
Very nice. May I ask what fuel system is in the car? I made 1100+ with MS-109 and ID 1000's @ 19psi, but after all bugs sorted out, my Aeromotive in tank pump is plain out of volume, fuel pressure is dropping on high loads.

Thanks for sharing quality comparison between the fuels.
__________________
438cid IPS Twin Turbo.
Boost6924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 04:18 PM   #4
ayousef

 
ayousef's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boost6924 View Post
Very nice. May I ask what fuel system is in the car? I made 1100+ with MS-109 and ID 1000's @ 19psi, but after all bugs sorted out, my Aeromotive in tank pump is plain out of volume, fuel pressure is dropping on high loads.

Thanks for sharing quality comparison between the fuels.
how much pressure are you loosing? no harm if you aren't loosing way too much pressure though. My car makes 21.5psi here in cold Dubai, on 93 octane pump gas, how? Static and Dynamic compression ratio, well and probably a missing link which I haven't figured out yet
__________________

1150bhp Whipple 4.0 Supercharged 427ci Camaro ZL1
ayousef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 05:26 PM   #5
Boost6924
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Indianapolis,IN
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by ayousef View Post
how much pressure are you loosing? no harm if you aren't loosing way too much pressure though. My car makes 21.5psi here in cold Dubai, on 93 octane pump gas, how? Static and Dynamic compression ratio, well and probably a missing link which I haven't figured out yet
It's loosing 15 psi at the top (above 6000rpm) of the pull on 4th gear.
__________________
438cid IPS Twin Turbo.
Boost6924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2013, 09:49 PM   #6
headless camaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 white auto
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SAN GABRIEL
Posts: 15
the transformers banana?
headless camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 09:04 AM   #7
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanquisherSS View Post
Boost only? What about on spray with the direct port?
Just Boost, The dyno rollers are too slippery to measure the power with the Spay, I made a few hits on Sat and blew the slicks away.

My Dyno is now over 10 years old and the Knurl has worn Smooth.

I Am having Carbonite come in next Tuesday to Coat the Rollers to eliminate this issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boost6924 View Post
Very nice. May I ask what fuel system is in the car? I made 1100+ with MS-109 and ID 1000's @ 19psi, but after all bugs sorted out, my Aeromotive in tank pump is plain out of volume, fuel pressure is dropping on high loads.

Thanks for sharing quality comparison between the fuels.
This is one of the Few Fore Triple pump systems that were made along with a Custom ADM Triple MSD Voltage booster set up Andy made for us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by headless camaro View Post
the transformers banana?
Nuclear Banana.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 09:53 AM   #8
Crawler
 
Crawler's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 2SS L99
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 167
I've almost always steered clear of oxiginated fuels on boost applications. Only exception being if I've run out of blower due to it being way undersized.

Always been a fan of high octane in race applications with spray or boost. MS-109's only place in my mind is in a non power adder application.

Way too big of a likelihood of melting something. Maybe its just my tuning abilities.

You have way more experience here than I do. Will you share your experiences with oxiginated fuels in big power adder applications?
__________________
Car nut for life.
Wes Snow-GM Employee
C6-LTs,Magnaflow,Halltech,Cam,Yank 3200,TranCooler
09 Hayabusa-Spiney thing in the exhaust 468RWHP
95 Dodge Cummins- 9.5 1/4 mile
Gone-12 2SS/RS SMD Built
Gone-C6 Procharged 416
Gone-07 CTS-V Procharged 427
Crawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 11:06 AM   #9
TROndrey

 
TROndrey's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 1LT/RS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
Nuclear Banana.
GO BANANA GO!!!

__________________
2010 Camaro 1LT/RS
Imperial Blue Metallic
K&N Typhoon CAI
MRT v2.0 Axle-Back
RX Performance Catch Can
TROndrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 11:11 AM   #10
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawler View Post
I've almost always steered clear of oxiginated fuels on boost applications. Only exception being if I've run out of blower due to it being way undersized.

Always been a fan of high octane in race applications with spray or boost. MS-109's only place in my mind is in a non power adder application.

Way too big of a likelihood of melting something. Maybe its just my tuning abilities.

You have way more experience here than I do. Will you share your experiences with oxiginated fuels in big power adder applications?
We use oxygenated fuels for More Power over pump gas, and keep Oxygen sensors Happy, but anytime we are looking for more power there is more risk.

We do have to run them a 4-6% richer that we normally would.

For example we ran 10.4:1 with Oxygenated fuel and we run 11.5:1 on C-16 same set up.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com

Last edited by JANNETTYRACING; 11-25-2013 at 11:25 AM.
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 12:00 PM   #11
Crawler
 
Crawler's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 2SS L99
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
We use oxygenated fuels for More Power over pump gas, and keep Oxygen sensors Happy, but anytime we are looking for more power there is more risk.

We do have to run them a 4-6% richer that we normally would.

For example we ran 10.4:1 with Oxygenated fuel and we run 11.5:1 on C-16 same set up.

Ted.
That follows what I've seen for a safety net. It just always left so much HP on the table.
__________________
Car nut for life.
Wes Snow-GM Employee
C6-LTs,Magnaflow,Halltech,Cam,Yank 3200,TranCooler
09 Hayabusa-Spiney thing in the exhaust 468RWHP
95 Dodge Cummins- 9.5 1/4 mile
Gone-12 2SS/RS SMD Built
Gone-C6 Procharged 416
Gone-07 CTS-V Procharged 427
Crawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 12:22 PM   #12
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawler View Post
That follows what I've seen for a safety net. It just always left so much HP on the table.
It really has more to do with the Stoich value 13.4 for VPms109 14.777 for C-16

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 01:14 PM   #13
white ZL1

 
Drives: none
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DFW area
Posts: 1,844
So there's no difference. Appx .78 lambda on both fuels.
white ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 09:50 AM   #14
Rdunn
Really, Really Fast
 
Rdunn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: St.Louis,Mo
Posts: 686
Oxygenated fuels are perfect for boost. we see on average about 100+ whp gains going from C-16 to the oxygenated Q-16.

the only time you want to stay away from the oxygenated fuels is running a nitrous application. then you would want to lean more towards C-16,C-23 or VPNOS (designed just for big nitrous applications)

Rdunn
VP Fuels Dealer
__________________
Procharger F1X, TH400, E85, CBI Street Cars, DSX Tuning, 1300whp
Rdunn is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.