09-28-2011, 10:57 AM | #29 | |
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
My old man was a '69 Z owner back in the day, and there's a reason he switched to solid lifter BBC's...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter Last edited by chevy454; 09-28-2011 at 11:08 AM. |
|
09-28-2011, 11:23 AM | #30 | |
Too Many Great Choices
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
|
Quote:
Another interesting point is that with all the safety standards added today's cars are not that much heavier. |
|
09-28-2011, 11:27 AM | #31 |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
"History" has a way of glossing over what was FACT, "back in the day".
Fact: A COPO 9561 with L72 427 sold for less dough than an SS396-L78/375hp...but, sadly, the vast majority of dealers didn't know about 'em, or stock 'em. Less than 1000 built. All-time bargain, all-time lust factor...and I wish I hadn't passed on a $7,000 example in '85! Fact: A COPO 9560 with ZL1 427 was made of an even rarer alloy called "unobtainium". 50% more $$$$ than a "factory" Hemi Cuda/Dart circa '68, and half as many made. 69 total. Some of those languished into the '70s, and were only sold after engine transplants. The "ultimate Camaro"...that almost no one wanted, new! Fact: "Off the showroom floor", a '68-'69 Z/28 was highly regarded...by EVERYONE! Quickest? No. Fastest? No. Best-handling? Yes. Image? Yes. Desirability? The current number of '69 Camaro Z/28s faaaar exceeds the actual number built...which was about 20,000. Which meets/exceeds ALL factory-built '69 Big Block Camaros... Fact: When introduced in late-'66, after the brochures were printed/shipped, the '67 Z/28 was essentially a COPO in that almost no one knew about it. 602 sold. Put into the '68 brochure, a-w-a-y went sales...not from word of mouth, but from public knowledge/acceptance. And Dealers started stockin' them. Wonders what a lil exposure will do... Fact: The Big Block SS396, in 325 hp and 375 hp versions, were also late arrivals for the '67 Model Year...but, being available with Air and, particularly, Automatic (in 325 hp form, both) made these more "saleable" in Dealers' minds. A nod to "history" that has been adopted by GM with the coming ZL1..."lessons learned". Fact: A Gen-1 Camaro SS396/325 hp with Automatic and Air weighed...are you ready for it?...as much as a Gen-5 1SS...3850 lbs. "History..." |
09-28-2011, 12:02 PM | #32 | |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Clyde |
|
09-28-2011, 12:05 PM | #33 |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
|
09-28-2011, 12:09 PM | #34 |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
|
09-28-2011, 12:38 PM | #35 |
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
You do realize that the 396 Camaro in the other lane was over a tenth quicker and had 3+ mph on Jerry's Z, right (while carrying almost 200 more pounds)? Notice how Jerry gets tree'd then run down on the big end...
I'm not sure exactly which year that video is from, but if it's from the 2010 Dutch I believe Ficacci's 396 Camaro had about 3 tenths or so on MacNeish...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter |
09-28-2011, 01:23 PM | #36 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS M6 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 795
|
"top dog" is a little broad really. Top dog at the strip or on the road course? The Z/28 was a purpose built car so GM could compete in TransAm and in order to do this it had to be sold to the public. GM wanted a lightweight car they could put a 302 cubic inch limited engine in and sell to the public so to qualify as legal for TransAm. In stock form it ran well. Add to it (if you ordered them, the headers, cross ram dual quad intake and carb, and cam which were dealer installed items and it it ran really well. However, it was by no means a COPO 9561 or 9560 killer at the drag strip. The COPO cars 13.5 and 13.1 second cars whereas the Z28 was a high 14 to low 15 second car in stock form. The ad you posted is just that, an ad which is used to persuade sales. In that ad, yes GM was trying to make the Z28 sound like it was the baddest of the bad. In some ways, like on the road courses it performed exactly as they planned. It got a TON of recognition from it's spotlight in TransAm and that is why it sold well (better than the COPO's) and was easy to persuade buyers to think it was the best. So was it top dog? Well in terms of sales against the other potential top dogs (COPO) then yes it sold more. But if your top dog is strickly performance, then I'd vote the COPO's were the top dog.
__________________
|
09-28-2011, 02:48 PM | #37 | |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Quote:
BTW, I believe the original premise, here, was RPO, not SPO (COPO) versions. No COPOs...hell, not even an L78...in the brochures... They were a genrally well-guarded secret to almost everyone. The local dealer was adament that no such 427 Camaro existed! Putting more cubes in an equal-weight drag car generally means more possible power...ergo, a Big Block should outrun a mini-block 302 in "fortified" fashion. But a Z/28, in '69 off the showroom floor, enjoyed a better balance of weight (fr/rr) and at least 200 fewer pounds at the Curb. Showroom Stock, the "average" test times for RPO'd '69 Camaros would favor the L78 over the Z/28 over the other two also-rans... IIRC my brother's then-new L78 '69 Nova, on E70/14s, ran a best of 13.85...well-tuned, unmodified, after many "laps" of practise...and my '68 Z/28 ran a best of 14.40 on E70/15s, comparably. Same strip...same 4.10s (the max gear for Pure Stock, locally). In '69, the Nova ran B/PS and the Zapper ran F/PS, just so you know what NHRA was thinkin'. |
|
09-28-2011, 03:08 PM | #38 |
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Addendum:
I recall a late '69 issue of Hot Rod Magazine where a GM-supplied Z/28 "tester" was balanced/blueprinted/heads cc'd, headers, 4.88s, 7" slicks, front skinnies, carb "scienced"/jetted...an "optimized" but streetable/legal Stock Eliminator 302 4bbl car. Results: about a 1/4 second off the then-National Record for F/Stock, running actual (corrected) 12.60s (?)...IIRC. COPO L72s ran A/Stock, L78s ran B/Stock, and their records would have been at/under 12.00s, at that time. Today's Stock Eliminator, what with "factory" Mustang FRs 'n such, bears NO resemblance to the Stock-class cars of '69. Back then, showroom iron (no body-in-white one-offs) was mandatory, as were 7" tires and very restricted upgrades. |
09-28-2011, 03:55 PM | #39 | |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Clyde |
|
09-28-2011, 09:50 PM | #40 |
|
Back in the day was no different than now. At the test and tune nights at Atco I see Mustang GT 500s running high thirteens. Back in the day you had bad drivers too and terrible tires. The big block cars with the extra weight up front were especially handicapped.
I can tell you L78 Camaros had no trouble with Z28s with stickys on both. Of course for me I was spending my nights at Front Street in Philly and not at the track. Even the 350 Hp hydraulic cammed 396s ran hard with LTs, tires, and carb upgrade. There were very few factory Camaro 427s around but of course they would have been even faster. But this still does not take anything away from the Z28. It was a better all around HiPo car than the big block Camaros. The Z28 mystique is why we are all here. We do not want ZL-1 overkill. Just a fast, simple, as light as possible, NA car with track ability. I am not knocking the ZL-1 by the way, it is very cool. Those of you defending the Z28 I am with you. But it did not rule the street. Most of the motor-heads back in the day were much more impressed with big block solid lifter Chevrolet power. Sounds like now too doesn't it?
__________________
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" |
09-29-2011, 09:13 AM | #41 | ||
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Other than maybe the 'Vettes, Chevrolet's ad department SUCKED...and pretty much still does. Ford and especially Mopar weren't afraid to let the world know what was available, but Chevrolet made you dig for the good stuff. Quote:
You were the one that *repeatedly* posted that it was a driver's race between an L78 and a Z/28, and then you post a video of a D/S Z getting outran on the drag strip by a similarly equipped B/S L78 Camaro...Jerry will be flattered to see what you think of his driving I'm sure! The extra 200 pounds plus the 3mph higher trap speed shows the 396 has a lot more horsepower than the 302, probably to the tune of 75-100hp more...the great thing about less weight, though, is that you don't have to tune it! And *I* never assumed all of the "Z/28 people are idiots" (my dad owned a '69 Z for many years when I was younger), that one's on you...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter |
||
09-29-2011, 09:53 AM | #42 |
Too Many Great Choices
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
|
All around performance drivers car Z28 wins.
1/4 mile only SS 396/375 wins (just barely see top of page). Give me a car that is very good at everything any day! |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PEDDERS SUCCESSFULLY FITS 305s ON ALL 4 CORNERS! | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 467 | 06-11-2013 09:45 PM |
GT5 Camaro pics | brantley847 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 93 | 05-27-2013 08:35 PM |
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 06:08 PM |