Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2008, 08:41 PM   #127
AirGoya

 
AirGoya's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago/Carbondale
Posts: 815
The side scoops on the Z06 are for the brakes and they are functional.
__________________
-Tim

AirGoya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:21 PM   #128
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
I appreciate the fact that the hood and front clip vents look good. But what a wasted opportunity... I understand that hood latches, windshield wipers among other things share that space. And I like the look, I just want it to work also. True RAM air or CAI from the factory...

I think DGthe3 should add "lack of functional ______ vents" to the list of complaints. Maybe there isn't enough of an outcry for it to make the list but it bugs me. I'm sure GM thought this one through and it didn't meet all the criteria to make it on the Camaro.... Still wish they worked.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:25 PM   #129
2K05GT
Muscle Car Fanatic
 
Drives: 2017 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 271
If you really think about the Z06 opening, the size alone says that its not functional. I mean there is now way that little slit would allow the amount of air needed to flow for that size engine.

Look at the WRX STi Scoop, that thing is HUGE and is functional for that tiny engine.

My Mustang did not come with a scoop, But I added the Roush Hood Scoop and made it a fully functional scoop. Not easy but I did it. (I will post pictures once I finish the US Patent paperwork.)

As far as Cowl Hoods today, most are not functional since modern engines do not have a carb on top of the motor, the intake tube and filter box are located in the front or front corner of the engine compartment, the amount of ducting needed on a metal hood would be expensive and heavy.
__________________
2017 Shelby GT350, Ruby Red, H6088
2017 Camaro SS, Hyper Blue Metallic
2016 Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black
2005 Mustang GT, Mineral Grey - Sold

Last edited by 2K05GT; 02-27-2008 at 10:06 PM.
2K05GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:37 PM   #130
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2K05GT View Post
I f you really think about the Z06 opening, the size alone says that its not functional. I mean there is now way that little slit would allow the amount of air needed to flow for that size engine.

Look at the WRX Scoop, that thing is HUGE and is functional for that tiny engine.

My Mustang did not come with a scoop, But I added the Roush Hood Scoop and made it a fully functional scoop. Not easy but I did it. (I will post pictures once I finish the US Patent paperwork.)

As far as Cowl Hoods today, most are not functional since modern engines do not have a carb on top of the motor, the intake tube and filter box are located in the front or front corner of the engine compartment, the amount of ducting needed on a metal hood would be expensive and heavy.

I agree. But there are plenty of aftermarket companies like (edit) APM that make functional Cowl and ram air hoods with the appropriate intake ducting to make it work. Chevy can do it too.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:42 PM   #131
WillInThe04Ranger
 
WillInThe04Ranger's Avatar
 
Drives: 04 Ranger, 95 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Posts: 684
Send a message via AIM to WillInThe04Ranger
Wasnt the SS Hood scoop a functional hood scoop??
__________________
America's Manififest Destiny, Rollin On Radials
WillInThe04Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:58 PM   #132
Omega94
 
Omega94's Avatar
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Greater Philadelphia Area
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillInThe04Ranger View Post
Wasnt the SS Hood scoop a functional hood scoop??
Yes it definitely is functional!!
__________________

1994 Camaro 3.4l V6, 5-speed, SLP Loudmouth I cat-back exhaust.
It's loud, slow as all get out, but loud
No more money going into this one...everything's being saved for my 5th Gen.
2010 Camaro SS 6-speed, Black/Black
Omega94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:59 PM   #133
WillInThe04Ranger
 
WillInThe04Ranger's Avatar
 
Drives: 04 Ranger, 95 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Posts: 684
Send a message via AIM to WillInThe04Ranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega94 View Post
Yes it definitely is functional!!
SO they can do it again with this camaro, because to me the SS Scoop is sexy but it isnt that big ........
__________________
America's Manififest Destiny, Rollin On Radials
WillInThe04Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:07 PM   #134
camaro10
 
camaro10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 45TH Anniversary SS
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by camero View Post
Yeah even the Z06 and ZR1 don't have an open vents in front and it's a MAJOR styling feature of those cars. If you think about it it's obvious that the Camaro won't have it open either because hood latch (and actually the main structure that supports the radiator and the whole front end) is right behind there just like in the Vette. And yeah the rears are like the 69's as you can see in the all the pictures. The sheetmetal (including the gas cap) has been finalized for a LONG time.
OK, so DGthe3 you can now add to your signature:

...and none of the Vents are real!


It's still awesome though!
__________________

My newest edition, Chevy V8 Power!
camaro10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:07 PM   #135
2K05GT
Muscle Car Fanatic
 
Drives: 2017 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 271
The 4th gen Camaro had a longer hood that helped to design a front air box that allowed for it to work. the 5th gen does not have that luxury.

Ram Air Myth...
Until the cfm flowing through the hood scoop is equal to or greater than the cfm that your engine is pumping, your HP increase will be exactly zero, zip, zilch. Say the vacuum pump that is your engine pulls 10,000cfm (just an example, but not an unreasonable number given the size of the engine) through the intake. You must be traveling fast enough to flow 10,000+1 cfm through the opening before you will see ANY HP increase. Now up to that point you will be increasing the volumetric effiency of the pump. The engine doesn't have to work as hard so your gas mileage and throttle response might improve, but that's it, no extra ponies because there is no extra air. You cannot defy the the laws of physics. How fast do you need to go to flow 10,000cfm through an opening area of 0.2sq.ft. (approx 6 inches in diameter)? Well at 1mph you will flow 17.6cfm, at 60mph just better than 1050cfm.....@ 568mph you will be just breaking even at 10,000cfm and then you start making real HP!!! Who needs a private jet when you have that car!!!! Keep in mind, this assumes that the intake is in an area of high pressure and will actually capture that much air. A typical hood scoop will not. It's a nice thought though.

Why the Z06 and Camaro scoops will not effect aerodynamics....
Look at the Picture of the Ferrari below, notice that the smoke stream is not touching the car, this in positive pressure, now notice the very front of the car, the smoke is farther away from the car here because the leading pressure is higher here and creates a "skin" of air so to speak. this skin or bubble of positive air does not move as fast as air further from the car.
for GM to put the slit up on the nose was a smart thing since it will not effect the overall dynamics. but it also makes the slit useless.
__________________
2017 Shelby GT350, Ruby Red, H6088
2017 Camaro SS, Hyper Blue Metallic
2016 Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black
2005 Mustang GT, Mineral Grey - Sold
2K05GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:10 PM   #136
Fbodybuddy
 
Fbodybuddy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 66
"at 60mph just better than 1050cfm.....@ 568mph you will be just breaking even at 10,000cfm and then you start making real HP!!! Who needs a private jet when you have that car!!!!"

I don't think 568MPH is too fast.

Thanks, Dragon, for the reply on the turn signals. Makes sense. Now I can sleep comfortably tonight.
Fbodybuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:11 PM   #137
CaptianSam
Car Garage
 
CaptianSam's Avatar
 
Drives: 350z,A4,SRT8...see sig
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: north west
Posts: 830
my 350z has 'Heat release' style hood scoops similar to the viper and it adds a little bit more downforce... yea it is noticable... and one more thing about the air intakes and CAI... i had both a pop charger (short semi ram air) and CAI's on both my 350z and brothers charger... and the Pop charger worked better on both... the CAI tubing was too narrow and long and made what seemed like a whislling sound(turbo-ish) this is because the air in the tubing is travelling extremly fast... faster air = hotter air... less hp...and it also means the engine is gasping and lugging for more as the air cant full the plenum...btw...THOSE ARE UGLY HEADLIGHTS...........
__________________
2012 2SS RS Ordered
Black on Black 6 speed Coupe Artic Lid Stripes
Yes I Supercharge Everything

On My Ipad
Xbox McLovin1515
Ps3 McLovin1555
Current Autos:68z28,03viperSRT10,04escalade,05RangeRoverSport SC
Project Autos:80corvette350-500hp 6speed,06charger S'C 6-speed posi,74Firebird400blue,69chevelle572 707
New Autos:2012CamaroSSRS,09ChallengerSRT8
Past Autos:....too many to list

"i told you it was gettin' an LS3"
Go down deep enough into anything and you will find mathematics. Dean Schlicter
B.Sc. Hons. Mathematics
CaptianSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:12 PM   #138
2K05GT
Muscle Car Fanatic
 
Drives: 2017 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fbodybuddy View Post
"at 60mph just better than 1050cfm.....@ 568mph you will be just breaking even at 10,000cfm and then you start making real HP!!! Who needs a private jet when you have that car!!!!"

I don't think 568MPH is too fast.

Thanks, Dragon, for the reply on the turn signals. Makes sense. Now I can sleep comfortably tonight.
Good point, you can never be too fast...

I seen a Mustang with the License plate that said 761-MPH
I thought WFT... it was a Mach 1 Nice...

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
I agree. But there are plenty of aftermarket companies like (edit) APM that make functional Cowl and ram air hoods with the appropriate intake ducting to make it work. Chevy can do it too.
Right, but they are Fiber Glass not metal. unless Chevy makes a fiber glass hood for the production car which I doubt, the metal one would be heavy and expensive to make.
__________________
2017 Shelby GT350, Ruby Red, H6088
2017 Camaro SS, Hyper Blue Metallic
2016 Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black
2005 Mustang GT, Mineral Grey - Sold
2K05GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:25 PM   #139
Fbodybuddy
 
Fbodybuddy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 66
"I seen a Mustang with the License plate that said 761-MPH
I thought WFT... it was a Mach 1 Nice..."

One of my cousins had a 72 Mach 1 that he shoe-horned one of those hot rodded 427 whatever Ford motors in it. I don't know that much about old Fords, but i remember that that car could probably do 761 MPH. He wrapped it around a power pole and that pretty much ruined the whole thing. He did come out of it with only a broken left arm though. Come to thing of it that Stang had quad headlights?????
Fbodybuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:29 PM   #140
WillInThe04Ranger
 
WillInThe04Ranger's Avatar
 
Drives: 04 Ranger, 95 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Posts: 684
Send a message via AIM to WillInThe04Ranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fbodybuddy View Post
"I seen a Mustang with the License plate that said 761-MPH
I thought WFT... it was a Mach 1 Nice..."

One of my cousins had a 72 Mach 1 that he shoe-horned one of those hot rodded 427 whatever Ford motors in it. I don't know that much about old Fords, but i remember that that car could probably do 761 MPH. He wrapped it around a power pole and that pretty much ruined the whole thing. He did come out of it with only a broken left arm though. Come to thing of it that Stang had quad headlights?????
Sounds like he found a cobra engine ........... but where?!?!?!?! THATS IT!!!!!!! Now im gonna have to get a GT500 motor to put in my truck
__________________
America's Manififest Destiny, Rollin On Radials
WillInThe04Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 04-04-2012 06:10 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
Camaro (concept) Press Release!! Pencil.Fight 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 07-21-2008 03:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.