Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2015, 06:34 PM   #1
Dool-C15
 
Dool-C15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2ls
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 22
Are the 14 and 15 v6's any quicker than the 10-13s?

I know the 14 and 15 have a little bit more power but I also heard they weigh more. What do these cars run in the quarter mile? Thanks
__________________
Dool-C15
Dool-C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 06:53 PM   #2
NYYFan325
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 508
The 14-15s have no more power then the 12's and 13's. They all share the LFX engine. The 10-11s have the LLT which are rated a bit lower (312 vs 323)
__________________
NYYFan325 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 08:52 PM   #3
MBS


 
MBS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 rs 2lt
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 2,497
After my Long tube headers I doubt it, and the LFX cant have them . Get the Indy track for us and we will race to make sure
MBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:16 PM   #4
rebelyell22


 
rebelyell22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
anywhere from a 13.9 to a 14.5 or slower. Not fast
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
rebelyell22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 07:57 AM   #5
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
13s are respectable ETs though. Firebreathing muscle cars like the 1970 LS6 Chevelle SS454 did a 13.4 to 13.88 stock, depending on which car rag you believed in 1970.

Losing by .02 second to an LS6 Chevelle? Not shabby.
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 10:22 AM   #6
rickyrocket

 
rickyrocket's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 blk 1 SS
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Coventry RI
Posts: 1,309
Mine is....V6 to V8 upgrade
__________________
15 1 SS
rickyrocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 10:51 AM   #7
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelyell22 View Post
anywhere from a 13.9 to a 14.5 or slower. Not fast
11.5 or slower. Not fast.

See what I did there?
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 12:04 PM   #8
sixtyseven
 
sixtyseven's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2LT/RS 2017 XL1200C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: First State
Posts: 274
In no way am i saying the 15 LFX is any quicker. I think there may be some slight differences. Im coming up with a different throttle body/TPS part number for the 2015 than compared to previous years LFX engines.

According to GM parts. This fits 2014 Camaro LFX (12632172 Throttle Body) but not the 2015 Camaro LFX.
__________________
2015 2LT/RS Black -w- CGM Rally Stripes. CAI, Elite CC, Apex air scoop + w/b kit, JacFab ported IM/Extendolator, Solo HFC's, Corsa Sport Cat-Back #14953, GM strut brace, GM stealth splash guards, GM premium floor mats, Defenderworx two tone sills, Emblem Pro LFX hood emblems, FR41-20x9/20x10 gloss black wheels, OK91/93 - OKTCM Tune.

sixtyseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 12:09 PM   #9
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Part number changes probably are from small internal revisions or consolidating parts from other LFX's. Even a few HP won't make a difference on the track with a car this heavy, and torque is the real number that needs to be increased on the V6.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 01:17 PM   #10
rebelyell22


 
rebelyell22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
11.5 or slower. Not fast.

See what I did there?
Yours was quick until it blew up. Fast is relative
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
rebelyell22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2015, 01:26 PM   #11
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelyell22 View Post
Yours was quick until it blew up. Fast is relative
Even quicker after it blew up. Yes, fast is realative. You can draw an arbitrary line that excludes lots of cars. 11.5 would exclude ALL stock 5th Gen Camaro times, but let me feel good that magazine time say my Z05 would be faster. However, like you, I haven't poated a time slip to prove I can even get in that 13.9 to 14.5 range you drew your arbitrary line at. Those did run at the track, so until we provide a better slip, they are are faster than we are. That's not relative; it is absolute.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.