Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2009, 08:26 PM   #155
97one

 
97one's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 & 1967 Camaro, 2015 Impala, +1
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1,165
[QUOTE=STS Guy;864027]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97one View Post

Can't win them all. Thank you for looking and giving me feedback!

And what lag? May I ask the basis on that statement?
I have driven a car w/a turbo, so I know the feel of a lag.
I also know my supercharger was instant boost,it had no lag.
Even in your link it speaks about the turbo boost : don't come till the rpms get to well over 2k.
I never drove a rear turbo, but it would have to have more lag than a front mounted one.

97one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 09:20 PM   #156
STS Guy
Marketing and Sales
 
Drives: P-R-O-J-E-C-T-S
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 54
[QUOTE=97one;864172]
Quote:
Originally Posted by STS Guy View Post

I have driven a car w/a turbo, so I know the feel of a lag.
I also know my supercharger was instant boost,it had no lag.
Even in your link it speaks about the turbo boost : don't come till the rpms get to well over 2k.
I never drove a rear turbo, but it would have to have more lag than a front mounted one.

There is zero reason for our systems to have 'more lag'. Amazingly after all these years that is still assumed. Do you have a gauge to see when your boost comes on with the SC?

You will be suprised to see that it comes on at very similiar RPMs. Here is a link directly from Kenne Bell. Look at the part where it states what RPM the SC boosts... 2000 RPM.
There is a plethora of information on that page. It talks about heat, RPMs, Boost....ect.


http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?id=18
Since you say the Kenne Bell has boost at 2000 RPM, does that mean I will be driving around in boost all the time?

No. Boost and power output depends on how far the throttle is open. The supercharger automatically compresses and boosts as much air as it needs to feed the engine. Full boost comes in when the throttle is wide open and does not depend totally on engine RPM as do centrifugals. For example, you can cruise down the freeway in low gear at 4000 rpm at part throttle and not see 1psi of boost - but floor the pedal and you get instant full boost (power).



And as far as a rear mount having more lag, Why would it?
STS Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 10:25 PM   #157
97one

 
97one's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 & 1967 Camaro, 2015 Impala, +1
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by STS Guy View Post
There is zero reason for our systems to have 'more lag'. Amazingly after all these years that is still assumed. Do you have a gauge to see when your boost comes on with the SC?

You will be suprised to see that it comes on at very similiar RPMs. Here is a link directly from Kenne Bell. Look at the part where it states what RPM the SC boosts... 2000 RPM.
There is a plethora of information on that page. It talks about heat, RPMs, Boost....ect.


http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?id=18
[COLOR="Red"]Since you say the Kenne Bell has boost at 2000 RPM, does that mean I will be driving around in boost all the time?

Here's 2 quotes fr the thread...........
pqtiii ..Quote :
I installed a STS twin kit on my 07 Mustang last year. (( There definately isn't the instant torque, but from about 3500rpms)) on in each gear, it pulls hard. Don't really having anything to compare lag to, but it starts building boost around 2700 and tops out about 3500.

tbyrne..Quote:
Boost starts to come on in the UPPER 2000RPM range.

So maybe 2000RPM for the SC... & 2700RPM for the turbo.

All I know is I can feel the INSTANT boost in power w/ the Supercharger & not with the turbo.
That would be one main reason of many reasons that I would not buy ANY turbo not just STS's

And as far as a rear mount having more lag, Why would it?
Not to debate that ft./rear mount part, BUT any turbo has the lag.


Last edited by 97one; 08-30-2009 at 10:51 PM.
97one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:08 PM   #158
Jericho
Come see me.
 
Jericho's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet Line-up
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 557
Send a message via Yahoo to Jericho
I think the diameter of the pipe would effect the 'lag' more than the distance from the source. But, were only talking of 10+ft? In truth the lag should feel exactly the same if not so close that it makes no difference anyway.
__________________
When you have a finely tuned percision piece of engineering.
Vin#30271
Jericho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:45 PM   #159
ZZcamaro


 
Drives: 2SS w/ ZZ427 Package!!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jericho View Post
I think the diameter of the pipe would effect the 'lag' more than the distance from the source. But, were only talking of 10+ft? In truth the lag should feel exactly the same if not so close that it makes no difference anyway.
The lag is caused by how long it takes to pressurize the area....Now think about this:
Where you place the Blowoff valve can have a great effect on what portion of the tube remains pressurized....There is a reason that STS builds it the way they do...
Also the right size turbo will be spooled up faster, and lagged reduced....Trust me, you may talk about lag, but when you drive a car that has the proper setup and tuning installed, you will be hard pressed to show me the lag.

Just my opinion, but I do have a lot of testing and seat time to verify.
ZZcamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:45 PM   #160
STS Guy
Marketing and Sales
 
Drives: P-R-O-J-E-C-T-S
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 54
:WINNER:

You are absolutely correct. The SC versus Turbo debate is an awesome one with those that understand the physics and realities of each. I do not want to harsh on anyone so forgive me for sounding like it, but hearing "My SC is better cause your turbos don't boost till 2000 RPM..."

Superchargers boost at almost IDENTICALLY the same RPMs!!!

"Turbocharged engines often suffer from lag because it takes a second or so for the exhaust gases that drive the impeller/turbine to reach sufficient velocity before boost is created. "

I copied that from a tech article from the 1930's

Thank god we now have this amazing thing called FUEL INJECTION with adjustable ECM programmers and tuning capabilities that compensate for that lag.

If you have been in a car with improper tuning, wrong spring, wrong BOV placement, wrong this, wrong that.....Guess what- LAG.

(Enter STS) When you purchase a system that takes half a year or more to test, beatup, screwup, blowup, evaluate, then repeat till right...
Guess what-you hit the pedal and your out of there like a bat straight from hell.
STS Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:49 PM   #161
5th Gen SS
 
5th Gen SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS M6 IOM and Black/IOM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 152
Just wait. I've got a few other ideas to talk to you about this week. Phase 1, Phase 2, etc..
5th Gen SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 11:52 PM   #162
STS Guy
Marketing and Sales
 
Drives: P-R-O-J-E-C-T-S
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Gen SS View Post
Just wait. I've got a few other ideas to talk to you about this week. Phase 1, Phase 2, etc..
I am already drooling about it Stephen...believe me.

(Love the air intake idea)
STS Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 12:41 AM   #163
dmack2k7
 
Drives: 02 mitsubishi Eclipse SpyderGT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: FT. Bragg, NC
Posts: 100
sweeet nice debate sts guy.
dmack2k7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 12:42 AM   #164
dmack2k7
 
Drives: 02 mitsubishi Eclipse SpyderGT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: FT. Bragg, NC
Posts: 100
dmack2k7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:38 AM   #165
Jericho
Come see me.
 
Jericho's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet Line-up
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 557
Send a message via Yahoo to Jericho
this is cool
__________________
When you have a finely tuned percision piece of engineering.
Vin#30271
Jericho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:30 PM   #166
STS Guy
Marketing and Sales
 
Drives: P-R-O-J-E-C-T-S
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 54
Thanks a bunch guys. I appreciate the fact that you don't just view the source as someone trying to hawk their system.
As you can see, there is a large amount of old, outdated, and just plain obsolete 'information'. Forums like Camaro5 are a goldmine for misinformation and undeniable fact all mixed into one.

Technology is a beautiful thing.
STS Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:42 PM   #167
talwell

 
talwell's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 LS1 Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Staten Island
Posts: 1,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by STS Guy View Post
Thanks a bunch guys. I appreciate the fact that you don't just view the source as someone trying to hawk their system.
As you can see, there is a large amount of old, outdated, and just plain obsolete 'information'. Forums like Camaro5 are a goldmine for misinformation and undeniable fact all mixed into one.

Technology is a beautiful thing.
Do you have any updated pics of the underside of the car to show the boosted air return lines to the intake? I would be really interested to see how you squeezed them in there
talwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 02:38 PM   #168
5th Gen SS
 
5th Gen SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS M6 IOM and Black/IOM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by talwell View Post
Do you have any updated pics of the underside of the car to show the boosted air return lines to the intake? I would be really interested to see how you squeezed them in there
I will get the pics posted soon. Quality takes time. I will keep everybody updated on two different project cars.
5th Gen SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 04-04-2012 06:10 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 338 04-15-2009 05:33 PM
Camaro (concept) Press Release!! Pencil.Fight 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 07-21-2008 03:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.