04-26-2014, 01:02 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 2SS, 2004 Dodge Ram 150 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 574
|
Alright thanks everybody. .. I'll l just let him think I don't know how close it will be before the actual race and then I'll stomp on him
__________________
|
04-26-2014, 01:13 PM | #16 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
To be more precise, the advantage is in the mid range and top end for your Camaro. Those mustangs are rated at 240TQ and weigh several hundred lbs less than our Camaros, but they run out of steam quickly. A quick stop light to stop light drag, you may not put much length on him, but at the 1/4 mile, or say from a roll you should stomp him pretty good.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
04-26-2014, 01:13 PM | #17 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
LS1 Fbodys weighed less and actually made more HP. Many manual LS1 Fbodys dynoed well over 300 rwhp (350+hp at the crank) I ran 13.3s - 13.4s @ 105 - 106 mph all day long (bone stock) in my 99 z28. |
|
04-26-2014, 01:16 PM | #18 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Quote:
Anyone who really gives a darn knows the 5th gen V6 Camaro will not run with a 4th gen SS.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
04-27-2014, 12:01 AM | #19 |
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 1998 Cobra Join Date: May 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 278
|
|
04-27-2014, 12:10 AM | #20 | |
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
|
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2014, 02:33 PM | #21 |
1BlueLT
Drives: 2007 Z06 Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 62
|
From personal experience...You shouldn't have a problem.
|
|
|
|
|