Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-13-2011, 08:16 AM   #1
maxdmax

 
maxdmax's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East KY
Posts: 756
Hay 10 second Maggie guys what boost/pulley?

Apparently all cars are not the same as far as boost and pulley size for the faster cars. I assume it is due to the level of supporting mods like CAMs, fuel systems and other mods. After quite a bit of reading it does seem that my car is really really low on the boost verses pulley size with 9 psi on a 3.2 pulley. Pretty sure there is no belt slipping. We added a ZR1 3bar map sensor to be sure there was not something going on with the gauge. I am thinking about going down to a 3.10 pulley, below are my mods around this. Any ideas also what are you seeing on your cars as far as boost/pulley size?

Stock block LS3 stick car
TVS 2300 SC
No Meth 93 pump gas
G5XB CAM
LPE Electronic duel fuel pump
Fast 65lb injectors
Kooks 1 7/8 Headers (No cats - Magnaflow 3" exhaust)
Halltech CAI
Jannetty belt tensioner
TVS 2300 Cog-drive
HP 638 601 TQ
__________________
LPE 417 - TVS2300 787 RWHP 759 Torque - Built by WWW.KYSPEED.COM
maxdmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:23 AM   #2
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
With the overdriven cog drive in the rear, an Innovators West overdriven 8 rib set-up in the front, and a 3.2 pulley I make 17/18 psi. The problem is that during each shift I have belt slip so the boost drops down to 12 psi and subsequently I am loosing major HP.

I'd be worried about belt slip when you get down to a 3.1 pulley. At 10 psi we found that the rear pulley's were slipping.

I'd putting my IW 8 rib set-up in the classifieds right now and looking to get into a 10 rib. It was awesome for up to 14ish psi but I got the jones for more boost!!!!!!!!!!!!

My car made 684/690 at 5500. That's when the boost falls off.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:28 AM   #3
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,185
You got some belt slip I'd almost bet money on it with a 3.2. You also have a good cam and headers which is going to bring the boost down which isn't a bad thing cause your still getting the power of the pulley with less pressure. Think of boost as resistance in a way.
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:36 AM   #4
maxdmax

 
maxdmax's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East KY
Posts: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post
With the overdriven cog drive in the rear, an Innovators West overdriven 8 rib set-up in the front, and a 3.2 pulley I make 17/18 psi. The problem is that during each shift I have belt slip so the boost drops down to 12 psi and subsequently I am loosing major HP.

I'd be worried about belt slip when you get down to a 3.1 pulley. At 10 psi we found that the rear pulley's were slipping.

I'd putting my IW 8 rib set-up in the classifieds right now and looking to get into a 10 rib. It was awesome for up to 14ish psi but I got the jones for more boost!!!!!!!!!!!!

My car made 684/690 at 5500. That's when the boost falls off.
I had the rear pulley start to slip when I went to the 3.2 pulley so I got the Jannetty tensioner and the rear 1:1 cog drive. I am pretty sure I am OK since I have no belt dust anywhere now and the boost went up proportionally as expected all along from a 3.6 at 5.5 psi and then a 3.4 at 7.3 psi and finally a 3.2 at 9 psi. I'm with you I could very well get back to some slipping at 3.1 but than again I am not spinning it even close to your setup. If I do the short block I want from ERL this winter I will probably need to go to the 10 rib. Thoughts?
__________________
LPE 417 - TVS2300 787 RWHP 759 Torque - Built by WWW.KYSPEED.COM
maxdmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:37 AM   #5
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLE58 View Post
You got some belt slip I'd almost bet money on it with a 3.2. You also have a good cam and headers which is going to bring the boost down which isn't a bad thing cause your still getting the power of the pulley with less pressure. Think of boost as resistance in a way.

I'd have to agree about the belt slip. 9 psi with a 3.2 is on the low side even with a cam and headers. I was at 12.5 psi with a 3.2, LS3 conversion and 2" headers. That was with the 8 rib. It wasn't worth trying with the 6.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:38 AM   #6
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxdmax View Post
I had the rear pulley start to slip when I went to the 3.2 pulley so I got the Jannetty tensioner and the rear 1:1 cog drive. I am pretty sure I am OK since I have no belt dust anywhere now and the boost went up proportionally as expected all along from a 3.6 at 5.5 psi and then a 3.4 at 7.3 psi and finally a 3.2 at 9 psi. I'm with you I could very well get back to some slipping at 3.1 but than again I am not spinning it even close to your setup. If I do the short block I want from ERL this winter I will probably need to go to the 10 rib. Thoughts?

I had no dust as well. The dyno told the tale of the belt slip. We just saw it again last week.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:39 AM   #7
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,185
Yeah but he is on a 6 rib I thought and didn't know he had teds tensioner or the cox I figured he was using stock Maggie set up
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:40 AM   #8
kevin1106


 
kevin1106's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 ZO6 3LZ Stage 2 A8
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: La plata MD
Posts: 2,299
From what I've been told, your in a safe zone right now. Any more boost and your gonna risk damaging your motor. I'd do all forged internals before adding anymore boost. IMO
kevin1106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:41 AM   #9
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,185
Cog... Not cox lol sorry typing from I phone. Sorry Jamie I thought you said you disagree not Agree in a DA
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:43 AM   #10
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLE58 View Post
Yeah but he is on a 6 rib I thought and didn't know he had teds tensioner or the cox I figured he was using stock Maggie set up

The cog drive def eliminated the any rear slipping. The JRE super tensioner I'm sure has helped a ton but it all comes down to belt wrap vs how fast you are spinning the blower. He may have just enough slippage to lose a few psi in the higher rpm range.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:51 AM   #11
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,185
I'd agree if it was me anything under a 3.4 I'd go 8 rib
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:04 AM   #12
maxdmax

 
maxdmax's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East KY
Posts: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post
I had no dust as well. The dyno told the tale of the belt slip. We just saw it again last week.
What did you see on the dyno when the belt slipped? When my 3.2 slipped the boost was abput 1 to 1.5 psi higher until 3000 RPM and then just crossed below the line of the 3.4 and stayed about 1 or so pounds lower up to redline. It was odd, but we did not see a sharp drop anywhere. We knew it had to be slippage due to the numbers however. I will email my tuner and see if I can get my dyno charts and post them.
__________________
LPE 417 - TVS2300 787 RWHP 759 Torque - Built by WWW.KYSPEED.COM
maxdmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:09 AM   #13
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxdmax View Post
What did you see on the dyno when the belt slipped? When my 3.2 slipped the boost was abput 1 to 1.5 psi higher until 3000 RPM and then just crossed below the line of the 3.4 and stayed about 1 or so pounds lower up to redline. It was odd, but we did not see a sharp drop anywhere. We knew it had to be slippage due to the numbers however. I will email my tuner and see if I can get my dyno charts and post them.

Maybe Ted will see this or you can just email him for my dyno graph. I don't have it here. From what he described the lines, rwhp,tq, and boost climb in an uppward linear fashion then when you get to 5500 the drop off instantly and the boost drops down to 12 psi and then the other numbers decrease as well.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:19 AM   #14
maxdmax

 
maxdmax's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East KY
Posts: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post
Maybe Ted will see this or you can just email him for my dyno graph. I don't have it here. From what he described the lines, rwhp,tq, and boost climb in an uppward linear fashion then when you get to 5500 the drop off instantly and the boost drops down to 12 psi and then the other numbers decrease as well.
I can see that for sure, the deal on my car is it was smooth as any normal dyno run just less after 3000 rpms when it slipped. After the tensioner and the cog it went right to 9 psi and at the end close to 9.5 psi for the last bit. We were in a hurry so I am not sure we really looked at it closely. I emailed my tuner to send me the last 3 dyno graphs if he could all on the same graph so we could see the 3.4 at 7 psi, 3.2 slipping and the 3.2 after the mods.

Thanks for the help and comments!
__________________
LPE 417 - TVS2300 787 RWHP 759 Torque - Built by WWW.KYSPEED.COM
maxdmax is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maggie guys....in here please! kcobean Forced Induction - V8 31 11-30-2011 08:31 PM
Maggie 2300 installation almost done, two questions Fiftydriver Forced Induction - V8 15 10-14-2011 12:58 PM
Maggie 2300 for LS3 with ROTO-FAB and Fessler Pod & Gauges RabanzZ28 Forced Induction 20 08-21-2011 03:03 PM
My photo album of Maggie photos. Nine Ball Forced Induction - V8 19 08-26-2010 02:09 PM
Maggie experts...5 lbs boost on a 3.6 pulley? Luvpilot Forced Induction - V8 2 06-04-2010 07:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.