03-07-2013, 05:45 PM | #57 |
Drives: 6.1L Charger SRT8 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 44
|
A tune on the L99 makes it a lot faster. My friends was a slug in stock form he only ran a 13.5@105
__________________
Charger SRT8 6.1L Intake | Exhaust | Tune | 180 T-Stat |
03-07-2013, 07:30 PM | #58 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS/ RS INFERNO ORANGE L99 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alliston Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,057
|
|
03-07-2013, 08:06 PM | #59 |
Drives: 2013 Ram Express Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
|
So how close is the gap now between L99's and LS3's? The GXP G8 auto's were quicker than the 6 speeds although both did have LS3's.
|
03-07-2013, 08:12 PM | #60 |
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS-m6-night fury-gforce9" Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Pottsville, Pa
Posts: 103
|
Edmunds have the base price and stats on the following
2012 charger srt8 $46,620 price 0-60 4.6sec quarter mile 12.8 2012 challenger srt8 392 $44,680 price 0-60 4.5sec quarter mile 12.6 2012 Camaro 1le $37,035 price 0-60 4.3sec quarter mile 12.7 I can go on. with the aftermarket $=speed. and dodge is ridiculous in sales of pony cars the last 4 years, and u can see why. there can be 1000 you tube videos of them beating us or us beating them. I don't have to state the obvious for the conclusion. u wanna go fast in a straight line for cheap, get a mustang. u wanna go fast for cheap in a straight line and around turns, get a Camaro. wanna spend way too much and not do either...get a dodge. lol. (minus a viper) |
03-07-2013, 09:02 PM | #61 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
I never raced anyone stock but I can say once my car had LT headers, tune and a CAI I never lost to a 6.1 SRT regardless of mods. I will agree that a 6.1 SRT is faster than a L99 in stock form but I ordered and bought my 2010 L99 brand new for 30k, MSRP was a little over 33k. There is no way I could have got a SRT for under 40k and I shopped all 3 brands. I could have got a RT for the price of my L99 but that car is a joke by comparison. Even if and its a BIG IF the SRT is faster than the SS LS3 or L99 its the RT that is the SS's competition not the SRT. We only compare the SS and SRT because they are so close in performance and all agree that the RT is no match for a SS even though its in the same price class.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
03-07-2013, 09:51 PM | #62 | ||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Car and Driver:SS 13.0 sec @ 111 mph Road & Track: SS 13.0 sec @ 110.7 mph (0-120 mph: SS 15.4 sec) Inside Line: SS 13.1 sec @ 110.4 mph The SS is simply faster than the 6.1L all things being equal. Quote:
I won't even speak of the 6.1L Challenger/Charger's track performance. Let's just say the Mazdaspeed3 is faster around VIR
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
||||||
03-07-2013, 10:02 PM | #63 |
Drives: 13' 1LE Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,641
|
Car and driver got a 12.6@115mph !!! This is badass!! It was the Super Bee Charger SRT (lighter by 100lbs, no nav, stereo, leather and cheaper wheels and shock).
Tomorrow I'm getting a price quote on a 2013 Super Bee SRT8..It should be around 42000$(cad), which is equal to a 1LE 1SS with NPP exhaust(no zero option). That is a sweet deal for a 12sec car which is very close to the ZL1 in straight line performance. This would be a tough choice for a DD... from CAR and DRIVER; Our test car did the 0-to-60-mph dash in 4.2 seconds, 0-to-100 in 9.8, and the quarter-mile in 12.6 at 115 mph. Those numbers are a significant improvement over those of the last Charger SRT8 we tested; that car hit those same marks in 4.6 and 11.0, respectively, covering the quarter in 13.1 at 110. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...classic-page-2
__________________
13' 1LE
Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me. |
03-07-2013, 10:05 PM | #64 | |
|
Quote:
Forgive me if I don't rely on a YouTube video posted by an unverified source of "bone stock" cars with drivers of identical skill.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
03-07-2013, 10:12 PM | #65 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
03-08-2013, 12:36 AM | #66 | |
Drives: pleather and Chiclets Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: a line somwhere
Posts: 4,206
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
03-08-2013, 12:47 AM | #67 | |
Drives: 6.1L Charger SRT8 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
My Proof now show me yours
__________________
Charger SRT8 6.1L Intake | Exhaust | Tune | 180 T-Stat Last edited by ESARETEE8; 03-08-2013 at 01:00 AM. |
|
03-08-2013, 01:05 AM | #68 | |
Drives: 6.1L Charger SRT8 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
Both Bone Stock 12.8@109 12.6@110 (Atco run) but not a record run
__________________
Charger SRT8 6.1L Intake | Exhaust | Tune | 180 T-Stat |
|
03-08-2013, 01:12 AM | #69 | |
Drives: 6.1L Charger SRT8 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
Me: intake, catback, tune him (LS3): intake, catback, tune Me: 8.28@88.1 him: 8.30@87.6 we were door to door at the strip just like we were on the street.
__________________
Charger SRT8 6.1L Intake | Exhaust | Tune | 180 T-Stat |
|
03-08-2013, 02:00 AM | #70 |
Drives: 2SS/RS CGM LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,619
|
Don't sweat these guys, most on these forums are so close minded... I've owned 2 SRT8 (6.1) jeeps, one stock and the other with all bolt ons including LT's. I have seen 6.1's (300's and Chargers) with intake and tunes run 110 traps at ETown pretty consistantly...
I love my SS and know that it isn't the fastest car out there. But to be honest i don't care... I chose a small cam for my build to yield a faster car with great street maners. You will never connvince a camaro forum that your car is equal to those here, so just accept it and enjoy your ride with friends that might share your automotive enthusiasm... |
|
|
Tags |
5th gen, irwindale, ls3 ss, socal, srt8 |
Thread Tools | |
|
|