04-08-2010, 11:08 PM | #1 |
Drives: 1976 camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
|
2006 gt?
so i have a camaro last time i ran a 14.3 as my fastest with some lean problems.... and 3.42s so trapping in second and starting off well before the power band
going back in may and my friend might take his 2006 gt i now have gotten the lean problem fixed, 4.56s with posi i did spin a little before installed and a better exhaust installed and hoping to go low to mid 13s with kinda newb driver(myself) and the other being newbish himself lol anyone think i can give it a good run for the money, i dont plan on blowing the doors off but i still think it would be a good race |
04-08-2010, 11:19 PM | #2 |
|
Do you own an SS?
|
04-08-2010, 11:34 PM | #3 |
Drives: 1976 camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
|
no, 75 type lt z28 with
flat topped single sided valve relief pistons trick flow 195 heads at 62cc so its around 10.7:1 compresssion 3000 stall converter got rid of quite a bit of weight such as air and all that, jack, spare tire, weight of heads, wind shield wipers turbo 350 with 4.56 posi cam is 246/254 duration at .050 and .495 lift and .510 lift both intake first and exhaust second |
04-09-2010, 03:17 AM | #4 | |
|
Quote:
If I remember correctly, the 05-09 GTs usually run around high 13s. So, it seems like you'd be able to take him if the GT is stock. Has your friend done any modifications of his own? |
|
04-09-2010, 03:22 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
The 05-09 gts are good for 13.5 to 13.6 quarter miles, with as good as 13.3x if the driver is excellent (glory pass was 13.28), with that said you shouldn't have a problem taking him, I'd say you could get low low 13's out of that car.
|
04-09-2010, 11:55 PM | #6 |
Drives: 1976 camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
|
nope stock mustang
|
04-09-2010, 11:56 PM | #7 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
Most out on the track will be running 13.8-15.0~ Best GT time I've ever seen on the track was a 13.7 by a 2006 GT with slicks.
|
04-10-2010, 12:42 AM | #8 |
Drives: 1976 camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
|
no way a 2006 gt ran a 15....
|
04-11-2010, 06:51 PM | #9 | |
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
False, You must have a horrible da and high altitude. Get to the track more, mustang gt's are solid mid 13 second cars, not far behind your l99 camaro. |
|
04-11-2010, 07:25 PM | #10 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
Then again, finding people with regular street cars who know how to shift at the track is pretty rare. |
|
04-11-2010, 09:50 PM | #11 | |
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
Good point, but a lot of the tracks are also seeing camaro's running slow times too, and vettes, and gt500. Average times for competent driver (I do not fall into that category at the track) are mid 13's. |
|
04-11-2010, 10:16 PM | #12 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
Also, you're right. At the track on friday a GT500 was running 13.9 lol and a z06 was running 12.9. Was pretty funny how I beat a GT500, even though the guy clearly had NO idea how to shift. |
|
04-11-2010, 11:25 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
I've seen ZO6s and Vipers in the 14s. Definitely hysterical shit.
|
04-11-2010, 11:28 PM | #14 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
I think my laugh of the year goes to a Acura RSX with the license plate BOOSTED and a high wing spoiler running 20.5~
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Forza 3 update - full car list & new trailer | Sean@Phastek | Off-topic Discussions | 7 | 10-09-2009 11:00 AM |