05-27-2009, 09:55 PM | #113 | |
Banned
Drives: 08 GT Mustang | 65 GT Notchbac Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
415 is no where near the norm for a stock GT500..Not sure where you got those numbers. And I still say you run that LS3 at those numbers and it will not be long before it goes B O O M. The LS3 can take some boost...sure, but its not a forged bottom end. Sure you can do 500+ to a GT...its not wise, but sure it can be done |
|
05-28-2009, 05:49 AM | #114 |
Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
So if 415 is not the norm and 425 to 435 is, then ok, you really blew us out of the water with that realization of 10 to 15 hp more!!! Maybe you better call Lingenfelter and let them know that their packages aren't going to work because you said they are going to go BOOM! They might want to rethink their warranty of the S/C and engine if that is the case. I think I will trust their expertise over your vast knowledge of the LS3 engine.
|
05-28-2009, 06:17 AM | #115 | |
Drives: Anything I want Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: DfW - Texas
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
1 WORD -ENGINEERING Ok maybe 3 words - LINGENFELTER PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING - Yes they have engineering degree's,a few actually. |
|
05-28-2009, 09:25 AM | #116 |
Petro-sexual
|
OK - so I re-read the article regarding the KB vs the TVS 2300 (it was actually in 5.0 Mustang; I was wrong) and though the KB was proclaimed to be superior, I don't think I completely agree with all the methods and controls they used in the tests. For one, they went from the TVS to the KB using the same pulley size. However, it turned out the boost differential was something like 14 psi for the TVS and the KB was at like 20 psi! The KB showed A LOT more power, but it was making A LOT more psi. Also, the article stated using KB's intake system for this KB (2.8H was the model number I think) and it seemed like they used the OEM GT500 intake for the TVS - that upgraded intake was good for A LOT more power too. To me, the only real unbiased test was at the end of the article where they spun the blowers to achieve 20 psi of boost and quoted SC RPMs, air temperature, and power drain from the blower. The test concluded the KB operated more efficiently, HOWEVER, the TVS was spinning 18,000 RPMs while the KB was spinning 12,000 RPMs and they didn't disclose whether-or-not they were using the same pulleys for the dyno' tests. If that was the case, it seemed to me the test wasn't representative and equal because the pulley size wasn't made equal (like I mentioned above). I won't go into it more because I don't want to take away from this thread or from Magnusun - I only wanted to address what I posted earlier regarding a comparison of a screw vs the TVS. FWIW - this article may still be on the stands. It's an interesting read, but I think it's biased toward the KB. JMVHO.
You know, I was thinking last night after letting these numbers sink in even more, and realized this is even more power than the ZR1 dyno' I remember reading about a few months ago! And that was before adding boost, LTs, and the rest of the goodies. This is really something to behold, IMO. This is like 100 RWHP more than similarly equipped LS1 Camaros were making less than ten years ago! WOW!
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
05-28-2009, 09:41 AM | #117 | |
Banned
Drives: 08 GT Mustang | 65 GT Notchbac Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Furthermore, Yes I have a engineering degree to.Do I build engines ? Hell no. But I do understand enough to know that a engine that was built to a certain spec, has something we call STRESS AND LIMITATIONS...IE when you PUSH IT BEYOND those limits things break. The question is how far can the limits be pushed ? Your talking about pushing 600+ at the crank. On a non forged engine. Common sense says that a engine not design for that will only take so much at those elevated levels. Sure the numbers are fantastic. Those are really good gains and they have accomplished great numbers. Its great they offer a warranty on their parts. But unless THEY are going to replace your engine and not GM when it goes wrong, you are going to have a uphill battle having GM replace your engine when the pistons shake out of the exhaust like popcorn. Yeah good luck saying you did not have any mods on the car. Ya know, GM have engineers to...you know, the ones who actually BUILT the engine. It will be the same as any other company with any other mod. GM is no different. You mod the hell out of the car, and push it pass the limitations it was design with, WITHOUT replacing said parts, it will break. And unless that warranty says they are replacing the parts that broke guess what ? You will be replacing that engine yourself. |
|
05-28-2009, 09:46 AM | #118 |
"That Guy"
Drives: Camaro SS...........what else? Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OOOOOOOklahoma where the wind comes sweepin' down the plains.
Posts: 2,360
|
great stuff LPE!!
__________________
|
05-28-2009, 09:48 AM | #119 | |
Drives: 2015 1SS RS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 772
|
Quote:
Show me some apples to apples tests to make ME a believer. On a side note we have a screw compressor here.............It keeps the air tanks full for the shop. |
|
05-28-2009, 09:50 AM | #120 |
SST...
Drives: SST Camaro 2010 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
|
As these types of modifications become more common, we will see what the breaking point of the LS3's are. No different than people that put 200 shots of nitrous into bone stock Gen 1 350's. Some blow immediately, some make it through a whole season. Time will tell.
|
05-28-2009, 09:58 AM | #121 | |
Petro-sexual
|
Quote:
LOL at the air compressor. Those things are LOUD! The shop I was working at switched over to screws a couple years before I left and those things moved some air. You just couldn't carry-on a conversation within 30-feet, LOL. You you add what the RPM limitations are for the TVS and/or point us in a direction we can go to look at more detailed technical data for these superchargers?
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
05-28-2009, 09:58 AM | #122 | |
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
|
Quote:
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
|
05-28-2009, 10:00 AM | #123 |
Petro-sexual
|
It seems to me the crank and rods may be okay, but the pistons, rod bolts, head gaskets, and head bolts may be the biggest questionables. I'll have to look into that...
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
05-28-2009, 11:48 AM | #124 | |
Drives: Got one Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
05-28-2009, 11:52 AM | #125 | |
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Last edited by garagelogic; 05-28-2009 at 03:28 PM. |
|
05-28-2009, 12:02 PM | #126 | |
Petro-sexual
|
Quote:
Another point I've been pondering: Now, this was a Ford Racing case, right? Magnusun doesn't make it for Ford/Shelby, do they? Regardless, if 5.0 Mustang were to use a case designed by/for Magnusun, would that have changed the results? Are these cases propriatary? Will case design affect these numbers, and if so, than many of my points are probably moot since Lingenfelter and Henessey are using Maggy' cases, right? I know the rotors are all Eatons, but maybe the cases are anothe contributing factor
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SEMA Camaro: Yellow Camaro Concept | Tran | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 45 | 09-01-2011 02:19 PM |
Lingenfelter 2010 Camaro Engine Packages - up to 800hp! | Sizzox | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 108 | 04-14-2010 07:09 PM |
Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship | truth411 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 07-02-2009 05:10 AM |
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on | dieseldave24v | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 02-23-2009 06:56 PM |