ROUND 3 WITH MTI RACING 730hp 623.94 rwhp

[old motorhead]

Originally Posted by Z_Rocks

I'm not sure, but they started by making some changes to the LS3 and putting them on LS7 first and then got them on LS2 and etc. But for stock engine and low boost 1900 was/is sufficient and did a good job. But once the full Camaro kit came out, then it was no reason to it to old way. I guess it was just a stepping stone to get here!

So.....They're no longer saying that the 1900 is more "effecient" on an LS3 than the big, lumbering, power hungry, heat producing 2300? Hmmmm

[michael's maro]

Originally Posted by viper1cobra

I am happy to hear that you are enjoying your suped up ride. Are you planning on attending the C5Fest in April? If so it would be nice to see you again.



You should be the Official Spokesman for MTI Racing.

Yes, Barbara and I will be there.........#60 on the sign up page
Also a sponser...

I think I should be getting paid by MTI RACING...lol

[michael's maro]

Originally Posted by old motorhead

Sweet ride. Black is just good looking. I'm just too lazy to keep one clean. When you know how sharp it looks spotless, it makes you want to keep it that way!

I'm assuming that, if it's from MTI, you have the TVS1900 blower. Correct? How much boost does it take to make those #'s. Must be fun. Enjoy

I've got the TVS2300 8lb's of boost

Not that bad to keep clean, all my cars for the past 15 years have been black, except my corvette's

[MTI Racing]

Thanks Michael, you and your car are awesome! We are sure you are having a blast with all the new found torque and horsepower. We can't wait to see you at Camaro5fest it's going to be a lot of fun.

[Crowley]

Mind if I ask how much boost you are running? Also, have you upgraded the internals at all?

Great numbers!

thanks,
Crowley

[michael's maro]

Originally Posted by Crowley

Mind if I ask how much boost you are running? Also, have you upgraded the internals at all?

Great numbers!

thanks,
Crowley

Running 8lb's of boost,
Only internals are stage 2 cam, valvespring's etc.

[old motorhead]

What size pulley did you use on the blower?

[Total_Perf_Eng]

Did they happen to give you a dyno graph with a SAE correction factor? The STD is always much higher.

Im in love with the car though. It is SUPER clean.

[michael's maro]

Originally Posted by old motorhead

What size pulley did you use on the blower?

I'm not to sure on the pulley size, I will call MTI RACING on monday, I'll ask them to post all specs.. Thanks

[michael's maro]

Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng

Did they happen to give you a dyno graph with a SAE correction factor? The STD is always much higher.

Im in love with the car though. It is SUPER clean.

The only dyno graph they gave me was the 1 I posted..
Thanks for the kind words...

[CamaroSpike23]

pm replied....

Originally Posted by michael's maro

Round 1 SEPT 2009
American Racing headers
CAI
MTI RACING lowering springs
MTI RACING Big red sway bars
MTI RACING 6 shooter shifter
MTI RACING stainless steel braided brake lines
MTI RACING spark plug wire's (hotspark)

Round 2 NOV 2009
MTI RACING Comp cam, valvespring's etc.
MBRP Exhaust

Round 3 JAN 2010
Maggie install
3.73 gears

whats Round 4 going to consist of?

[MTI Racing]

Originally Posted by old motorhead

So.....They're no longer saying that the 1900 is more "effecient" on an LS3 than the big, lumbering, power hungry, heat producing 2300? Hmmmm

The efficiency of the 1900 is better for this size of engine. It is like slapping on a 1050 Dominator Carb on an engine that works best with a 600 Holley. But, "bigger is better" is what is marketed these days so we'll go with the flow.

Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng

Did they happen to give you a dyno graph with a SAE correction factor? The STD is always much higher.

Our DynoJet is spot on. Our STD reading on the graph is exactly what another shop's dyno will read on SAE. We have verified this numerous times vs. another local dyno same day, same car. So the 623 rwhp is absolutely 100% correct.
The increase of almost 200 ft-lb of torque at 2500 rpms is staggering.


To change the boost levels, different methods are used for each engine based on camshaft profiles, cylinder pressures, header flow, and achieved by different rear pulley step up drive, different supercharger pulleys and/or crankshaft pulley.

If your application needs only a smaller front pulley, call us and we can make one for you.

So...
Maybe Round 4 is 500 cu. inches of MTI Racing/RHS Block like this?.......

[Z_Rocks]

Originally Posted by MTI Racing

The efficiency of the 1900 is better for this size of engine. It is like slapping on a 1050 Dominator Carb on an engine that works best with a 600 Holley. But, "bigger is better" is what is marketed these days so we'll go with the flow.



Our DynoJet is spot on. Our STD reading on the graph is exactly what another shop's dyno will read on SAE. We have verified this numerous times vs. another local dyno same day, same car. So the 623 rwhp is absolutely 100% correct.
The increase of almost 200 ft-lb of torque at 2500 rpms is staggering.


To change the boost levels, different methods are used for each engine based on camshaft profiles, cylinder pressures, header flow, and achieved by different rear pulley step up drive, different supercharger pulleys and/or crankshaft pulley.

If your application needs only a smaller front pulley, call us and we can make one for you.

So...
Maybe Round 4 is 500 cu. inches of MTI Racing/RHS Block like this?.......

Stephen, did you guys ever finished that engine that had two S/C bolted on the top? Wasn't it like a 1000 HP that you were building?

[CamaroSpike23]

Originally Posted by MTI Racing

The efficiency of the 1900 is better for this size of engine. It is like slapping on a 1050 Dominator Carb on an engine that works best with a 600 Holley. But, "bigger is better" is what is marketed these days so we'll go with the flow.



Our DynoJet is spot on. Our STD reading on the graph is exactly what another shop's dyno will read on SAE. We have verified this numerous times vs. another local dyno same day, same car. So the 623 rwhp is absolutely 100% correct.
The increase of almost 200 ft-lb of torque at 2500 rpms is staggering.


To change the boost levels, different methods are used for each engine based on camshaft profiles, cylinder pressures, header flow, and achieved by different rear pulley step up drive, different supercharger pulleys and/or crankshaft pulley.

If your application needs only a smaller front pulley, call us and we can make one for you.

So...
Maybe Round 4 is 500 cu. inches of MTI Racing/RHS Block like this?.......