Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 12:21 PM   #1
dragrcr
2SS 6M
 
dragrcr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
LS3 / ROTOFAB TRAC TEST RESULTS

I went to Fontana yesterday and I did my first full quarter mile runs on my Camaro. The car is 100% factory stock including the 35 PSI in the rear tires. 2500 miles on the odo. I have had my Rotofab intake system sitting here for 3 weeks all along knowing I was going yesterday and I really wanted to do a back to back comparison. So, I made 3 passes and I was very happy with the baseline, especially since I have the 6 speed manual tans. It is hard to get consistent runs.....
Then I changed the intake and went straight back to the staging lanes. I did not drive around to let the computer learn anything. Not sure if that would matter since the car is in open loop almost the whole run anyways. I never made any attempt to cool the motor down and the hood was closed almost the whole day. As far as ambient and track conditions, I would say that the worst conditions would have been around when the first Rotofab run was and I was about to make a run right after 5PM and it had cooled down quite a bit. But that did not happen as they sent us packing. Obviously the best conditions would have been the first run of the day. It was a nice sunny day with no wind.


#1 11:30 AM
60 2.289
1/8 9.029
MPH 83.17
1/4 13.667
MPH 106.84 Good clean run except 60 ft


#2 12:15 PM
60 2.194
1/8 8.92
MPH 81.50
1/4 13.622
MPH 106.24 Lame 2-3 shift


#3 12:49 PM
60 2.193
1/8 8.948
MPH 82.08
1/4 13.645
MPH 105.99 Good clean run, felt good

ROTOFAB INSTALLED


#4 2:31 PM
60 2.199
1/8 8.862
MPH 82.96
1/4 13.494
MPH 107.19 Good clean run, identical 60 ft as #3


#5 3:02 PM
60 2.182
1/8 8.874
MPH 81.89
1/4 13.577
MPH 105.74 Felt like car laid down for a 1/2 second right after shift to 3rd Still happy with that ET Daytime temp peaked on this run at about 75 deg (Going by display in car but it felt hotter).


#6 3:34 PM
60 2.321
1/8 9.121
MPH 81.82
1/4 13.811
MPH 106.19 Clutch pedal stayed down / did not release forcing me to pedal the car in first gear. This sucked because I really wanted to back up run #4, but still not a bad run considering.
Attached Images
 
__________________
I "love" Drag Racing and Women!
dragrcr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:26 PM   #2
JohnInSoCal
 
Drives: RJT L99 500HP
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 535
thanks for the info. The track was open on a friday ?
JohnInSoCal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:34 PM   #3
dragrcr
2SS 6M
 
dragrcr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnInSoCal View Post
thanks for the info. The track was open on a friday ?
PSCA Event starts on Friday. Runs through the weekend. There was some crazy fast cars there!!
__________________
I "love" Drag Racing and Women!
dragrcr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 04:08 PM   #4
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
It would have been nice to see the 5 o'clock run! It does look like you had noticable gains in spite of running the Roto-fab intake in the hottest part of the day. Thanks for posting the info!
Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 07:09 AM   #5
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
Dragrcr,
Based on your run description and run time, I am assuming run #3 and #4 are the best to use for comparison. Do you agree? It looks like the stock intake was loosing MPH with each run-probably due to ambient temperature rise throughout your testing.
Also, I am assuming there was a significant rise in temperature from run 3 @12:49 in comparison to run 4 @ 2:31. Do you happen to know what the temp difference was? Just curious.
Thanks for taking the time to post your results.
Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 07:14 AM   #6
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Nice results. Don`t forget the more you spin at the line, usually means you will mph a little better than when you dead hook. At least thats been the case for me. #3 and 4 seem to be the best comparrison and looks like the rotofab is working great. By the way love your color combo......

__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 10:29 AM   #7
dragrcr
2SS 6M
 
dragrcr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
CORRECT!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto-fab 1 View Post
Dragrcr,
Based on your run description and run time, I am assuming run #3 and #4 are the best to use for comparison. Do you agree? It looks like the stock intake was loosing MPH with each run-probably due to ambient temperature rise throughout your testing.
Also, I am assuming there was a significant rise in temperature from run 3 @12:49 in comparison to run 4 @ 2:31. Do you happen to know what the temp difference was? Just curious.
Thanks for taking the time to post your results.
I agree with you 100%, I was losing MPH as the day warmed up and run #4 probably would have been 105.XX So, realistically the car could have picked up about 1.5 MPH and .15 seconds in ET. I just wished I could have got another clean run that day to back up run #4. But it did not happen.

Everything here is good except run #5 was a little weird. It did feel a little flat going into 3rd gear which would explain the lower MPH, but the ET was still pretty good.

And even run #6 was trash except if you think about it 106 MPH is excellent for me pedaling it in first gear. I literally had to chop the throttle closed and then stab it back to the floor to get the clutch pedal to come up and the clutch to apply. This is a known problem that I wish someone had a fix for.

I was using the display in the car for temps and I did not look at it until run#2 and it read 72. On run #4 it peaked at 75, but it felt a lot hotter standing around and definately sitting in the car. But you have to realize the car was sitting and I am thinking that ambient temp display does not read right unless you are driving/moving. Every time I remembered to look at it the car was sitting. There was no wind at all.
__________________
I "love" Drag Racing and Women!
dragrcr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 05:27 PM   #8
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
Thanks for the additional info! Even though we may not have the exact temps, it's good to know the Roto-fab intake gave you improvement in ET and top speed in spite of being tested at higher ambient temperatures than the stock system was ran at. I would rather see our system tested this way leaving no doubt it performs better than stock.
Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 05:41 PM   #9
bdg
 
bdg's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tx.
Posts: 93
You did really well for your first time running the car. MPH doesn't lie, Roto-fab intake had the highest so it definately increased the HP. There is some threads in here telling how to prevent the clutch from sticking. I do not remember wear I seen them though.
__________________
[IMG]http://i253
bdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 03:57 AM   #10
dragrcr
2SS 6M
 
dragrcr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
VALIDATION.

Well, I was able to run at Fontana again yesterday and now I am more sure about my performance increase with the Rotofab intake. Keep in mind that this track is actual altitude of about 1100 feet and runs slightly uphill. Not sure what the DA was but I do not think it was that good since they were actually predicting rain at one time. BUT, It was cold. 58 deg on the ambient display. My car now has the Rotofab intake, Royal Purple Syncromax synthetic fluid in the Trans, a MGW shifter and the BMR Trailing arms (they don't work). I always run 35 PSI in the rear tires.

Anyhow, first run I was trying to do a lower RPM clutch slipping launch and the clutch hung up again and did not engauge properly. But, I know what to do now so it is a quick snap the throttle closed and then right back open and that takes care of it. I am thinking I might have done a 2.05-2.10 60 foot if that did not happen. Not bad at all considering my inability to do a high RPM clutch slipping launch.

#1 9:18 AM
60 foot 2.306
1/8 8.891
MPH 84.84
1/4 13.429
MPH 109.12

Hot lapped right back for a second run. This was a clutch dropped at about 2500 RPM with the usual wheelhop, hook & bog.

#2 9:31 AM
60 foot 2.293
1/8 8.918
MPH 84.11
1/4 13.486
MPH 108.68

I made a couple more runs that were throw aways. I tried the competitive launch mode and it hits the tires way too hard. My clutch works perfect if you just dump it and in that mode it is 4200 RPM. So.......VIOLENT wheelhop where the tires are off the ground 75% of the time. So I basically had to get completely out of it.
I also tried another run short shifting it at 5500 rpm which caused me to be in 4th gear for the first time ever. I think, based on incrimental times, the best thing to do would be to shift to second at 5800 and then to third at 6200 and finish in third. If I had drag radials I would say to shift at 6200 every time.
Attached Images
 
__________________
I "love" Drag Racing and Women!
dragrcr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 04:52 AM   #11
Camar0wn3d
formerly "wh0rsep0wer"
 
Camar0wn3d's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS Summit White
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 489
I love seeing real world results. Thanks for posting. Also, I love your car.
__________________
2010 1SS/RS - CGM/Gray Interior - M6 (SOLD) Kooks 1 7/8" headers, Solo Mach-X, Vararam.

2012 2LS - Black A6 (SOLD)

2016 1SS Summit White A8
Camar0wn3d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 06:00 AM   #12
Exotic Performance Plus
 
Exotic Performance Plus's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Camaro Z28
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 33
Awesome results with the Roto-Fab! It is a shame these cars are having problems with the clutch pedal hanging up. The Corvette ZR1's are having the same problems. Bob
Exotic Performance Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 08:43 AM   #13
dragrcr
2SS 6M
 
dragrcr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
CLUTCH HANGING UP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus View Post
Awesome results with the Roto-Fab! It is a shame these cars are having problems with the clutch pedal hanging up. The Corvette ZR1's are having the same problems. Bob
Keep in mind, my cluch pedal is not sticking. It works smoothly in every circumstance and never sticks. It is just something to do with the higher RPM and being released slowly. Like the throwout bearing gets cocked or hung up on the shaft and will not move or it gets hydraulicly locked or something. Could be my input shaft has some runout or more than normal. I have no idea. But I do think this is a different problem than the corvetts. It's not just a basic sticking problem. My clutch did this when the car was brand new and could not have had any clutch disc material contamination of the hydraulic fluid or components. It never once stuck in normal driving or if I release the clutch fast at ANY RPM. It just burns rubber (a lot).
__________________
I "love" Drag Racing and Women!
dragrcr is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drag Test: 2010 Camaro SS Nine Ball 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 129 11-10-2010 06:28 PM
Pedders Suspension Benchmark Track Testing and New Jersey Track Day Info@PeddersUSA.com USA - NY / NJ / PA 35 10-26-2009 05:20 PM
Another Camaro Magazine Test - Sorry... KJS 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 40 04-21-2009 12:17 AM
Urine test and well fare FAF Off-topic Discussions 50 03-15-2009 04:50 PM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 11:20 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.