2011-ish Civic Si Coupe. Really?

[1sick_eg]

Originally Posted by DSX_Camaro

550whp V6 Camaro is capable of 10's too...

Edit: LOW boost? I guess GretchenGotGrowl's car is N/A

Low boost for the car. High boost is well,

[alaskacamaro]

Anything can be done with enough cash and knowledge. Just because we see a lot of "ricer" civics doesn't mean there are a few built well.

[DroptopZ]

A fast Civic is kind of like a woman with three boobs. you're not likely to see one in your lifetime. If you do, you probably wouldn't know what to do about it.

Respect where respect is due. I got beat in my IROC by a swapped crx once. If it's quick, who am I to say it's wrong?

[i2disturbedSS]

Originally Posted by 1sick_eg

Low boost for the car. High boost is well,

What was or is your fastest time in your Honda (I'm guessing you have/had a Honda based off your screen name)

[fif_gen_powa]

k series motors are no joke, heres two recent ones in the last few days tuned from a local tuner down here

all motor 329whp
http://instagram.com/p/qvdLe9rZ4n/?modal=true


13.8lbs boost 620whp
http://instagram.com/p/q5dcBBLZ7C/?modal=true


yeah... stock they are not much but i'd take a modded one all day over a modded camaro v6, there are a bunch of 11/10 sec honda street cars down here. real threats for even the v8 boys, v6 well... lol goodluck

anything can be fast, you guys just seem ignorant for your oh its just a slow honda mentality. and not a honda fan boy just respect anything thats built right and runs hard

[i2disturbedSS]

Im not a big fan of Honda either. I do like a nice clean NSX & S2k and some Preludes.
...
Talking about stock cars though I wouldn't pick a Honda if I wanted to be the fastest.

[Chrisco22]

Hate to be the dick here but this is the most ridiculous thing i ever heard. First of all, no one here is talking about a civic basically completely rebuilt and boosted up the ass. A stock si vs a stock v6 is easy pickings for a v6. Been there, done that. But simply reading paper should tell you that. Believe whatever you want, and granted paper racing isn't the best, there are plenty of real world drivers incapable of those times, however the 2011 si is a joke. From a dig is literally the only chance it has, and even that is just completely far fetched. From a roll, might as well race an aveo.

[Deki]

Originally Posted by 1sick_eg

Call bs all you want, but I've been messing with them for over 10 years. K20a2, k20z1/3, k24a2, all from the factory make close to 200whp. They were all under rated. Most of the guys on the newer civic forums are not the brightest. You're better off checking out k20a.

Give me a break man, a stock Si is not seeing 13s, EVER. Did I say EVER? Because I meant EVER. They are mid 14 seconds car in perfect conditions, and I mean high mid 14s. Like 14.6 and up, not 14.4. Most run high 14s low 15s.

[Bad70supreme]

13s in a stock civic! Lmfao!!!

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by jdubzzz44

k series motors are no joke, heres two recent ones in the last few days tuned from a local tuner down here

all motor 329whp
http://instagram.com/p/qvdLe9rZ4n/?modal=true


13.8lbs boost 620whp
http://instagram.com/p/q5dcBBLZ7C/?modal=true


yeah... stock they are not much but i'd take a modded one all day over a modded camaro v6, there are a bunch of 11/10 sec honda street cars down here. real threats for even the v8 boys, v6 well... lol goodluck

anything can be fast, you guys just seem ignorant for your oh its just a slow honda mentality. and not a honda fan boy just respect anything thats built right and runs hard

[DSX_Camaro]

^ beat me to it.

What kind of Honda engine revs to 9.5k??

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by DSX_Camaro

^ beat me to it.

What kind of Honda engine revs to 9.5k??

More importantly, if that is really his dyno graph (lots of reason to suspect it) look at how little power it makes below 6000 rpm. Unless it has a 6500 stall on tall geared auto, that thing will be crap at the strip.

[fif_gen_powa]

Originally Posted by DSX_Camaro

^ beat me to it.

What kind of Honda engine revs to 9.5k??

Well the honda motor found in the 1999+ s2000 stock from the factory has a 9,000 rpm rev limit, no idea how they figured out to make this one rev 500rpm more, thats insane

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

More importantly, if that is really his dyno graph (lots of reason to suspect it) look at how little power it makes below 6000 rpm. Unless it has a 6500 stall on tall geared auto, that thing will be crap at the strip.

totally agree especially as most of these are swaps in older models cars weighing in around the 2500 lb range thing must be an absolute pig @620whp.

and I see very few auto's around here just manual trans w/big slicks/high 2step at the track. oh and please go on about how that may not be his dyno graph, very interested

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by jdubzzz44

Well the honda motor found in the 1999+ s2000 stock from the factory has a 9,000 rpm rev limit, no idea how they figured out to make this one rev 500rpm more, thats insane





totally agree especially as most of these are swaps in older models cars weighing in around the 2500 lb range thing must be an absolute pig @620whp.

and I see very few auto's around here just manual trans w/big slicks/high 2step at the track. oh and please go on about how that may not be his dyno graph, very interested

So that guy did a swap into a 2500 lb car? He's an aftermarket manual with a 2 step. Interesting. Please post up a link to his build information. May be it will have the WHOLE graph. You know, one that has information that can be verified like shop name, car/owner info, date and correction/smoothing algorithms. That's pretty standard. It might also help explain howvthat power curve was achieved with that turbo.