11-04-2012, 02:14 PM | #15 | ||
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-04-2012, 04:04 PM | #16 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS\RS Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: socal
Posts: 160
|
|
11-21-2012, 10:00 AM | #17 |
Drives: 2012 IOM 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 21
|
I went with turbo for my application and I like being able to adjust the boost, especially since I'm at altitude. There is no real answer except what you like and what you find best for yourself.
__________________
2012 Inferno Orange Camaro Turbonectics T-76, 572hp/605tq, Pedders XA coilover kit
|
11-21-2012, 10:04 AM | #18 |
|
SLP FTW!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
11-21-2012, 10:38 AM | #19 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS A6 Victory Red Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Snohomish WA
Posts: 203
|
TVS 2300 all the way. It only kicks in when you foot is pushing hard!!
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS A6/L99 Victory Red
SLP TVS2300 Supercharger 6psi & Coil Covers. Roto Fab CAI. RX Catch can ZL1 Fuel Pump Kooks 1 7/8" LT Headers w/ High Flow Cats Corsa out the back! NT555R 305/35/20 472 RWHP 466 RWTQ 12.11 @ 114.3 MPH 1.81 60' Pacific Raceways Kent, WA 6/6/13 |
11-21-2012, 10:52 AM | #20 |
Drives: Exige, Miata, Ghia Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 2,309
|
Wouldn't it make more sense to go turbo as a daily driver? The reason being that if it is your daily driver, you want the best possible MPG and with a turbo, you will be close to stock MPG unless you get on the boost. With the supercharger, you are always in boost. Correct me if I'm wrong...
|
11-21-2012, 11:04 AM | #21 |
Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Your wrong.
SC have bypass valves so they are not always in boost. Turbos generally increase gas mileage because the motor runs more efficient at part throttle. I know my friend saw 2mpg increase going to twin turbos.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
11-21-2012, 11:20 AM | #22 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
Quote:
sent from my Note2 using Tapatalk |
|
11-21-2012, 11:42 AM | #23 |
Drives: everyone crazy... Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
|
|
11-21-2012, 11:54 AM | #24 |
Drives: 2010 camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: WV
Posts: 400
|
|
11-21-2012, 12:00 PM | #25 |
Drives: 96SS Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Castle Delaware
Posts: 1,948
|
For a car making under 700rwhp the Maggie all the way. The extra TRQ from the maggie helps a LOT with the heavy camaros. We are running a special right now on the SLP blowers installed.
|
11-21-2012, 12:09 PM | #26 |
I haven't had both but the tvs2300 has been trouble free and met every expectation for me. The torque is a monster at the strip but I'd rather have to deal with the torque than wish I could launch harder. I must say, turbos make huge power per pound of boost. As long as they are reliable , they are better from my point of view. Personally more components equals less reliability(keep in mind I have never had a turbo). That's just the way I viewed it when I made the decision.
|
|
11-22-2012, 09:34 AM | #27 |
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
|
11-22-2012, 10:55 AM | #28 |
Drives: 2012 45th Vert, 2011 4x4, 9sec Vega Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,188
|
My vote is for the TVS2300, almost finished installing my kit. Turbos are too many parts.
__________________
I feel it only fair to warn you, I have a black belt in CAPS LOCK.
|
|
|
|
|