Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2013, 03:10 PM   #127
V6owner
Cedar Creek Woodshop
 
V6owner's Avatar
 
Drives: One Badass 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rosenberg, TX
Posts: 2,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM camaro View Post
Mine is an auto LLT 2011 his was a manual LS3 please read this.
You should get a torque converter
__________________
2014 Black 2SS/RS 1LE
V6owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 03:21 PM   #128
IBM camaro
Texas HT5
 
Drives: IBM
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,335
How much will that run me?
IBM camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 03:32 PM   #129
V6owner
Cedar Creek Woodshop
 
V6owner's Avatar
 
Drives: One Badass 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rosenberg, TX
Posts: 2,227
$600-$800 plus install
__________________
2014 Black 2SS/RS 1LE
V6owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 03:32 PM   #130
PoorMansCamaro



 
PoorMansCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: Really Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 56,957
I trapped 104, with about 350 at the wheel. manual LLT
__________________
PoorMansCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 03:35 PM   #131
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Is it just me, or does anyone else think a 103 trap is way low for a S/C V6? Assuming the SS was a L99, then I would expect it to trap around 108-109 with just a CAI, which it did. I would think his car would trap 110+.
Agree...it seems low to me as well. Something going on. Who knows. Maybe another trip to the track would yeild better results with more experience.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 03:43 PM   #132
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Screen name appears to be Murnaneaa and he last visited about 3 months ago. Get his butt in here to update us.
I checked out his profile and he has mods listed in his sig. of course it may not be up to date any longer, but i see nothing there looks substaintial to me to get those times. Except for one thing.... "weight reductions". Surely to get times like that I'd expect his to be running light wheels with drag tires which likely lower his gear ratio. That combined with significant weight reduction and I can see him running low 13s, but 13.1 still sounds like a stretch. Maybe he's on the "NOS ?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 04:10 PM   #133
BaylorCamaro
Track > 1/4 Mile
 
BaylorCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 Z51
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycraft View Post
Mine traps a solid 109 on a 1/4 mile run. thats with a soft launch and spinning through first.
If you spin you will trap higher, not lower.
BaylorCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 05:25 PM   #134
sycraft
COTW 5/06/2013
 
sycraft's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Corvette Grand Sport-Ho-Vette
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 3,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorCamaro View Post
If you spin you will trap higher, not lower.
Good to know- why is that? hard to comprehend oh master of drag...... usually 109 is my trap speed all things considered.
__________________
2017 Grand Sport, Borla X Pipe.....Enough Said
sycraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 05:47 PM   #135
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM camaro View Post
Mine is an auto LLT 2011 his was a manual LS3 please read this.
Thanks for that. So, based on your dyno and his one mod, you really should make similar HP, with his peaking a bit earlier than yours. Yet, your down 5 MPH on your trap. So, is it possible your car is shifting too early? You probably want it to start the shift from 1-2 at about 6400 RPM and 2-3 about 6700. That will allow you to use the peak power you are making at the higher RPM. More time you are near your peak HP the better your trap will be.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 05:48 PM   #136
BaylorCamaro
Track > 1/4 Mile
 
BaylorCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 Z51
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycraft View Post
Good to know- why is that? hard to comprehend oh master of drag...... usually 109 is my trap speed all things considered.
The quicker you get down the track (the less time you sit spinning) the less time you build speed.

On my nittos I cut a 1.8 60' and got 13.1 @ 103-104 but on street tires I was cutting 2.0+ and trapping 105-107 with a 13.3-13.5 et.

Just take a minute and think about what is going on, if you spin off the line you are building up your "speed." If I take traction control off and mash the gas I don't go anywhere and just spin yet it says I'm doing 20 mph.

Similarly, if you bog off the line you will have a slower trap speed.

I have yet to have a pass down the 1/4 where my trap speed is the same between a good 60' (1.8) vs a bad 60' (2.0+).

Now this is just from my own experience and from what I have been told from some of the locals at the track.
BaylorCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 05:50 PM   #137
V6owner
Cedar Creek Woodshop
 
V6owner's Avatar
 
Drives: One Badass 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rosenberg, TX
Posts: 2,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorCamaro View Post
Simple physics really... The quicker you get down the track (the less time you sit spinning) the less time you build speed.

On my nittos I cut a 1.8 60' and got 13.1 @ 103-104 but on street tires I was cutting 2.0+ and trapping 105-107 with a 13.3-13.5 et.

Just take a minute and think about what is going on, if you spin off the line you are building up your "speed." If I take traction control off and mash the gas I don't go anywhere and just spin yet it says I'm doing 20 mph.

Similarly, if you bog off the line you will have a slower trap speed.

I have yet to have a pass down the 1/4 where my trap speed is the same between a good 60' (1.8) vs a bad 60' (2.0+).
+1
__________________
2014 Black 2SS/RS 1LE
V6owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 06:05 PM   #138
lscamaro


 
lscamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM Camaro LS A6
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorCamaro View Post
The quicker you get down the track (the less time you sit spinning) the less time you build speed.

On my nittos I cut a 1.8 60' and got 13.1 @ 103-104 but on street tires I was cutting 2.0+ and trapping 105-107 with a 13.3-13.5 et.

Just take a minute and think about what is going on, if you spin off the line you are building up your "speed." If I take traction control off and mash the gas I don't go anywhere and just spin yet it says I'm doing 20 mph.

Similarly, if you bog off the line you will have a slower trap speed.

I have yet to have a pass down the 1/4 where my trap speed is the same between a good 60' (1.8) vs a bad 60' (2.0+).

Now this is just from my own experience and from what I have been told from some of the locals at the track.
You're completely right, the more you spin, the higher you'll trap. What you explained is exactly what's going on.
__________________

Click Picture for Build Thread
lscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 06:13 PM   #139
SC2150
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 6,063
Good info from Gretchen, Baylor, and v6owner.

Weight is the cheapest and best way to lower ET. The stock mufflers deleted saves what, 60-70#'s or so? Start there (Murnanee has no mufflers so that is a big boost, and aftermarket wheels....but still stock style tries. I told him to get drag radials on shorter rims. No boost or we would see it when its in for work.)

As gretch stated, shift points are very critical, and the right stall converter is .3-.4 tenths on the V6.

Sycraft's I am willing to bet will trap even higher with his new clutch and power.....but he is setup for the road track and that's where he will shine. Also, stage shallow...barely light the second bulb as this gives you a small head start on breaking the beam. If your deep (top bulb goes out) you will run a bit slower.



SC2150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 06:29 PM   #140
lscamaro


 
lscamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM Camaro LS A6
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
Good info from Gretchen, Baylor, and v6owner.

Weight is the cheapest and best way to lower ET. The stock mufflers deleted saves what, 60-70#'s or so? Start there (Murnanee has no mufflers so that is a big boost, and aftermarket wheels....but still stock style tries. I told him to get drag radials on shorter rims. No boost or we would see it when its in for work.)

As gretch stated, shift points are very critical, and the right stall converter is .3-.4 tenths on the V6.

Sycraft's I am willing to bet will trap even higher with his new clutch and power.....but he is setup for the road track and that's where he will shine. Also, stage shallow...barely light the second bulb as this gives you a small head start on breaking the beam. If your deep (top bulb goes out) you will run a bit slower.



No way the mufflers will give you a 60-70 pound weight saving. I think it's about 45 pounds if you do the delete.

I agree that a good stock converter will yield great results, even though we've yet to see any timeslips to prove this, but it'll only yield great times with traction which he is already lacking.
__________________

Click Picture for Build Thread
lscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.