01-09-2009, 07:11 PM | #225 |
Drives: police interceptor Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 1,292
|
No, nissian cut weight, but they also added wieght thanks to gov. saftey regs and the car being slightly wider. The net result is that the 370Z weighs about 3350lbs. Read car and driver review. The 370Z is about 500lbs lighter than the manuel Camaro SS.
|
01-09-2009, 07:22 PM | #226 | |
Drives: Z34 370Z Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
Can you convert that to ET and 1/4 mile language plzzz? |
|
01-09-2009, 09:24 PM | #227 | |
Drives: not a 5th gen Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: somewhere
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
HAHAHA I do not think anyone can make a good analysis of the car's handling because NO ONE HAS TEST ONE (AFAIK). I think we can make assumptions about 1/4 mile because of comparison and numbers that have been alluded to. With that being said I think the 370 is a solid offering. Its interior looks nice. I like the exterior look of the car. The new engine is well designed. I would most likely consider buying one. However I doubt if will be buying a new car anytime soon because I think I could only get about $5 for my truck right now. |
|
01-09-2009, 09:40 PM | #228 |
Drives: Tricycle Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LA
Posts: 2
|
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496
I think this is the camaro SS numbers, edmunds did a test on i guess a preproduction car? .90g skid, 60-0mph braking @ 117 ft, 1/4 mile in 13.4, 0-60 in 4.9....... |
01-09-2009, 09:43 PM | #229 |
Drives: '90 Jeep Cherokee Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1
|
|
01-09-2009, 11:30 PM | #230 | |
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
01-10-2009, 01:59 AM | #231 | |
Drives: Tricycle Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LA
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
I hope it's better but we will see. BTW don't sound too offended i was just posting what i found after reading through this thread. I like the Camaro |
|
01-10-2009, 10:20 AM | #232 | |
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
I'm not flaming you, i'm just saying that if that was accurate more people would be refferencing it. Without too much thought i can just point to 4.9 0-60 and wave a red flag... the Chief designer talked to a member on this forum personally about how his personal best in the Camaro was 4.6
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
01-10-2009, 11:15 AM | #233 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I love the new Camaro (and will be buying one), but it will NOT handle as well as a 370z. That's just the way it is. The new 370z is one of the best handling cars out there. Motortrend - Lateral accel 370z (.99 G's) Road and Track - Lateral accel 370z (.97 G's) To compare, Road and Track only managed .93 G's when the tested the C6 Vette (01/08 issue). And .99 G's in the Z06 Vette (05/08 issue) The 370z (Touring) runs 275/35/19 series tires out back and the car only weighs 3350 lbs. That along with its excellent balance makes for a great handling car. The SS will have an advantage in a straight line, but the 370z will definately have an advantage on a tight road course or in the twisties. But the SS will dominate the 370z when it comes to straight line top end speed. |
|
01-10-2009, 11:27 AM | #234 | |
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
i agree with 97% of this post. ''That along with its excellent balance makes for a great handling car." The Camaro has better balance/weight distrobution... the Weight distrobution for the Z really isnt even all that good. The SS WILL beat the Z on tracks that allow you to dig into 4th and 5th gear more than once while the Z will win on tighter smaller tracks.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
01-10-2009, 11:27 AM | #235 | |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2009, 11:42 AM | #236 |
Moderator.ca
|
A lot of people will be surprised at how similar these two cars will in a straight line and in handling. But I would imagine that the Camaro will win on all but the twistiest of tracks, given drivers of equal ability.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
01-10-2009, 11:43 AM | #237 | |
Master of Medicine
Drives: 4th Gen Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 784
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 Camaro SS. 408 LS2. 500+RWHP/480RWTQ. Full UMI RR suspension. Koni/Strano. 295F/315R. 3500#(55/45)
|
|
01-10-2009, 11:46 AM | #238 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
But you do agree that the 370z will definately be a better handling car? You really can't argue with .99 G's and 275 series tires on a 3350 lbs car. And yes, I agree with you about the SS having more speed down any long straight sections, which would give it an advantage on a long road course. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camaro Laws | ChevyNut | Off-topic Discussions | 107 | 11-09-2016 05:40 PM |
SEMA Camaro: Yellow Camaro Concept | Tran | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 45 | 09-01-2011 02:19 PM |
GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 07:33 PM |
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on | dieseldave24v | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 02-23-2009 06:56 PM |
AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 16 | 09-04-2008 09:07 PM |