Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2013, 03:14 AM   #15
T-r3x
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss ( LS3 )
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ksa
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris82xx View Post
Power is just a number determined by a machine. Every machine differs, as does every blower setup. I'm going for more power now, but it has no bearing on how fast I can get the car up to. A car making less power on a Maggie can out perform my car with a centri depending on the run. So, really the question is, what goals are you trying to accomplish?
580 rwhp would be great with my mods. But which pulley size should I use?
T-r3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 04:12 AM   #16
Aqua_Blue_SS
 
Aqua_Blue_SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-r3x View Post
580 rwhp would be great with my mods. But which pulley size should I use?
I'm at 580 with a 3.4 pulley, long tubes, no cats, livernois fuel pump. 9.5#'s. Will need bigger injectors if i want to go higher.
Aqua_Blue_SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 04:30 AM   #17
T-r3x
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss ( LS3 )
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ksa
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRIS10's $ponsor View Post
I'm at 580 with a 3.4 pulley, long tubes, no cats, livernois fuel pump. 9.5#'s. Will need bigger injectors if i want to go higher.
So do you think I can make 580 HP with my mods?
Magnuson fuel injectors, ZL1 fuel pump, Long tube headers, no cats
T-r3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 06:08 AM   #18
UNRIVALED SS
 
UNRIVALED SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: El Paso
Posts: 704
Send a message via Yahoo to UNRIVALED SS
You're going to be close on injectors. I was only able to get 570 out of the ZR1 injectors. It`s pretty close, it`s possible you could do it with what you have. Give it a try and if the duty cycle on in the injectors is manageable you can save some cash.
UNRIVALED SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 06:17 AM   #19
T-r3x
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss ( LS3 )
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ksa
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNRIVALED SS View Post
You're going to be close on injectors. I was only able to get 570 out of the ZR1 injectors. It`s pretty close, it`s possible you could do it with what you have. Give it a try and if the duty cycle on in the injectors is manageable you can save some cash.
I'll check!
Did you install any thing else with the injectors and the headers? a cam for example ?
T-r3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 07:26 AM   #20
newagemuscle
Philippians 4:13
 
newagemuscle's Avatar
 
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 2,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-r3x View Post
Hey guys
I've finally bought a supercharger for my 2010 Camaro M6 :headband:
Long tube header + 2.5" cat-back + ZL1 feul pump + wideband installed
I bought the Magnuson kit which comes with 3.8 pulley (6 psi)
This supercharger will make about 125 HP with this pulley compared to 150+ HP with the SLP supercharger!

My question is (How far should I go with the boost to gain 150-160 HP? What's the best choice for the pulley?)

waiting for your replies
Thanks all
First of all, I realize every dyno can produce different numbers and it should be used as a measuring tool. I had similar mods as you do prior to installing my blower (Kooks 1 7/8 catted LT's, SLP LMII axle back, roto-fab CAI, and custom tune). I picked up the SLP TVS 2300 (Jackshft style) last year which is basically the same as the maggy. I am also running the stock 3.8 pulley. I did not use SLP's out of the box hand held tune due to my other mods. I did a before and after dyno run. Before the blower I put down 410 to the wheels. After the install I did 547 to the wheels. All in all I picked up close to 140 rwhp. I am also interested in going to a 3.6 pulley, but realize I would probably need other supporting mods, such as the ZL1 fuel pump you mentioned. I would assume that would put me close to 580 rwhp on my tuners dyno. Most of all I am concerned with remaining safe with a stock bottom end.
__________________

Last edited by newagemuscle; 12-04-2013 at 08:45 AM.
newagemuscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 09:57 AM   #21
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-r3x View Post
Did you make that number with stock ZL1 fuel pump?
No, as soon as the build started I went to a dual pump set-up. The ZL1 pump is only good to about 600 whp. The AFR's were great, was running 110 octane race gas. Car was amazing but the 4 bolt head couldn't contain the combustion pressure with continuous pushing of the engine. That is why the high horsepower LSX block is a 6 bolt head. The engineers understood that if you push the horsepower limit the pressure may lift the head enough to blow out the gasket so they designed the block with extra head bolts.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:42 AM   #22
UNRIVALED SS
 
UNRIVALED SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: El Paso
Posts: 704
Send a message via Yahoo to UNRIVALED SS
If I recall corectly at the time the car was at that power level (570 WHP). It was running a fairly conservative cam shaft, in addition to headers, CAI, fully 3" ARH exhaust in fact. It was dynoed with a 3K stall converter in the georgia heat on 91 octane gas from the Quick Trip station around the corner. Stock fuel pump as well but I wouldn't recommend or advise you try that stunt. I've been fortunate and I only ran the car on the 1/8th mile for the most part. Don`t remember the boost numbers at all honestly.
UNRIVALED SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 02:41 AM   #23
Bo White


 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Summit White 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vance Alabama
Posts: 8,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRIS10's $ponsor View Post
I'm at 580 with a 3.4 pulley, long tubes, no cats, livernois fuel pump. 9.5#'s. Will need bigger injectors if i want to go higher.
I'm in the same boat. Same power level and pushing 97% duty cycle. I'll have to buy more than just valvetrain parts on my next round of mods.
__________________
Retired wanna be cylinder head porter
2015 2SS 1LE Clutch reservoir, Vararam DRX, ported TB, TSP 2" headers, MGW shifter
Totalled:
2010 1SS Wilkes Performance/Eagle 416 shortblock, TSP custom valvetrain, PRC 260 heads, Edelbrock Pro Flo 102, th400 swap, 8" PTC 5500 stall= 535/435 at the wheels tuned Gen 3 Performance and Dyno 10.97 @ 124 full weight in 3100 DA CamaroFest X
Bo White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:24 AM   #24
Stingr69
'69 Owned Since '79
 
Stingr69's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Z/28 LeMans Blue w/White
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: LR AR
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessrayo View Post
My opinion but based on over 10 grand worth of experience.
"10 grand worth of experience" That is just so perfect.
Stingr69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:50 AM   #25
1LESSPROBLEM
 
Drives: blown
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: between here and there
Posts: 147
Go with the 8 rib setup and dont try to pulley down too far with the 6 rib. The belt will just slip and you wont make the boost you should. I know this from experience. You can run just about as much boost as a 2300 can push on a stock bottom end as long as the tune is good.
__________________
VF Commodore
LSA
Heads
Cam
Weld
1LESSPROBLEM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 10:30 AM   #26
2010SSRSM6


 
2010SSRSM6's Avatar
 
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,558
Without the ADM FPCM I would keep the boost under 8 psi (3.6" pulley) even with the ZL1 pump. Without the updated programing in the FPCM the pump will not ramp up in the higher rpm range and is not much better than the factory SS pump. Depending on what octane you get where you are, header size and the dyno, I doubt that you will see much more than 520rwhp.

With a mild cam, 1.5" LT's, Vmax TB, CAI inc cai for the maggie, 3.6" pulley and OD cogs I was very close to the limits of the ZL1 pump @ 9 pounds of boost. I'm running 1000cc injectors (850's would have been fine, but I had issues with FIC's 850's and they were no where near maxed out), I was at 590rwhp on crap 91 "winter blend" california gas in 108* heat.

I changed out the TB to BBK's new 95mm and jumped up to 620rwhp. I need to get my tune checked to make sure that everything is still ok, but this is as far as I am willing to go until I can make the motor bullet proof(ish). I'm going to wait and see how the new squash returnless system works out for others before I make a fuel system/motor build change.

Good luck!
__________________
UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......
2010SSRSM6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 01:28 PM   #27
T-r3x
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss ( LS3 )
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ksa
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1LESSPROBLEM View Post
Go with the 8 rib setup and dont try to pulley down too far with the 6 rib. The belt will just slip and you wont make the boost you should. I know this from experience. You can run just about as much boost as a 2300 can push on a stock bottom end as long as the tune is good.
Do you think I need to upgrade the fuel injectors or upgrade to 8 rib if I will use a 3.6" pulley?
T-r3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 01:33 PM   #28
T-r3x
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss ( LS3 )
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ksa
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010SSRSM6 View Post
Without the ADM FPCM I would keep the boost under 8 psi (3.6" pulley) even with the ZL1 pump. Without the updated programing in the FPCM the pump will not ramp up in the higher rpm range and is not much better than the factory SS pump. Depending on what octane you get where you are, header size and the dyno, I doubt that you will see much more than 520rwhp.

With a mild cam, 1.5" LT's, Vmax TB, CAI inc cai for the maggie, 3.6" pulley and OD cogs I was very close to the limits of the ZL1 pump @ 9 pounds of boost. I'm running 1000cc injectors (850's would have been fine, but I had issues with FIC's 850's and they were no where near maxed out), I was at 590rwhp on crap 91 "winter blend" california gas in 108* heat.

I changed out the TB to BBK's new 95mm and jumped up to 620rwhp. I need to get my tune checked to make sure that everything is still ok, but this is as far as I am willing to go until I can make the motor bullet proof(ish). I'm going to wait and see how the new squash returnless system works out for others before I make a fuel system/motor build change.

Good luck!
I use 95 fuel, do you think I can push the boost 8 psi with the ZL1 pump ?
T-r3x is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.