06-24-2009, 07:29 AM | #43 |
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,752
|
halo's are for decoration, they are not a substitute for the DRL's which are a safety mandate by law now..
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
|
06-24-2009, 07:55 AM | #44 |
Drives: Infiniti G35 Coupe Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 85
|
Does anyone know if our headlights are air tight or air sealed?
This info will help me in determining, whether to get the RS package. Thx. |
06-24-2009, 08:29 AM | #45 |
Drives: 2010 Camero... duh Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 14
|
I picked mine up two days ago (in Canada) and the fog lights are used as daytime running lights so I DO get a option to run halo with fog lights
|
06-24-2009, 03:59 PM | #46 | |
Drives: 2023 2SS Convertible Join Date: May 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
-Geoff
__________________
'12 2SS RS Convertible - Traded in.
'16 2SS Convertible - White on white, mag-ride, NPP, nav. Sold! '23 2SS Convertible -Same as above except orange. |
|
06-25-2009, 03:16 AM | #47 | |
HOOK'EM
Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,279
|
Quote:
why are you planning to add something in there like strobes or something? |
|
06-29-2009, 02:56 AM | #48 | |
just can't seem to leave
|
Quote:
my headlights come from the factory with strobe holes!!
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408 |
|
06-29-2009, 03:05 AM | #49 |
HOOK'EM
Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,279
|
|
06-29-2009, 08:31 AM | #50 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2009
Location: King George, Va
Posts: 881
|
I've done something similar to a few of my cars. I think the trouble with the Camaro is that the Halo is not powered by a seperate wire running into the headlight assembly. I believe it's one single hot wire and ground running into the headlight assembly and once inside, it splits to power the halo and HID ballast. I'll pop the hood today after work to verify.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS CGM American Racing Headers, Magnaflow axle back, Roto-Fab CAI, Audio Integrations Sub box, Alpine Type R 10, Alpine MRP-500 amp, Pro Clips iPhone Mount |
06-29-2009, 10:31 AM | #51 |
INJACC
Drives: 2010 CGM 2LT/RS AUTO Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal (South Shore)Quebec, Canada
Posts: 6,518
|
In Canada whoever has the RS package (HID). Your light switch has 4 settings:
#1: O = Off (Spring loads to Auto position when you turn it to the left of Auto). It Reboots. This will turn Off your HID & DRL when the car is running and only in Park. Once tranny is engaged then which ever your light switch is on, the appropriate lights will turn on. #2: AUTO = DRLs on at all times except when it starts to get dark then the HID comes on. #3: Parking Lamps = During the day the DRLs are on with the Halos { ( ) } on. But when it gets dark the DRLs come Off and the HID comes on even in this position. #4: HID = DRLs off on HID lights on. I hope I didn't confuse anyone..it seems complicated but once you fool around with this you'll know what to do...and Remember this is for Canada Only. I could be wrong with some of this but I just tested these out..correct me if I am wrong. |
06-29-2009, 01:27 PM | #52 |
|
Yeah all you have to do is push in the light knob and they'll turn on
__________________
|
06-30-2009, 02:48 AM | #53 |
Drives: '10 RJT,'95&'14 Vette Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cut Throat, NY
Posts: 1,723
|
DLR are only "mandated by law" in Canada, not the US.
__________________
"As ye sow, so shall ye reap" - Me
Mine at sunset |
07-01-2009, 01:50 PM | #54 |
barbarianmotorsports
Drives: 2010 camaro 2ss Join Date: May 2009
Location: riverside ca.
Posts: 137
|
so here is another question what is the bulb number for the daytime driving light . you can just change the color and make it look more like superwhite like the leds. that will look good.
|
07-01-2009, 03:21 PM | #55 |
Drives: TrailBlazerSS Join Date: May 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 190
|
General Motors, interested in reducing the build variations of cars for the North American market, began lobbying the DOT (United States Department of Transportation) to permit DRLs in the United States shortly after Canada required them. A prolonged regulatory battle was fought, with the DOT objecting on grounds of potential safety drawbacks and glare issues. Eventually, however, these objections were set aside and DRLs of the same types allowed in Canada (save for fog lamp DRLs) were legalized but not mandated effective with the 1995 model year. General Motors immediately equipped most (and, in following years, all) of its vehicles with DRLs beginning with the Chevrolet Corsica. Saab, Volkswagen, Volvo, Suzuki and Subaru gradually introduced DRLs in the U.S. market beginning in 1995. In recent years, Lexus has installed high-beam or turn signal based DRLs on US models. Some Toyota models come with DRLs as standard or optional equipment, and with a driver-controllable on/off switch. Starting in the 2006 model year, Honda began equipping their U.S. models with DRLs, mostly by reduced-intensity operation of the high beam headlamps.
Public reaction to DRLs, generally neutral to positive in Canada, is decidedly mixed in the U.S. Thousands of complaints regarding glare from DRLs were lodged with the DOT shortly after DRLs were permitted on cars, and there was also concern that headlamp-based DRLs reduce the conspicuity of motorcycles, and that DRLs based on front turn signals introduce ambiguity into the turn signal system. In 1997, in response to these complaints and after measuring actual DRL intensity well above the 7,000 cd limit on vehicles in use, DOT proposed changes to the DRL specification that would have capped axial intensity at 1,500 candelas, a level nearly identical to the European 1,200 cd and identical to the initially-proposed Canadian limit. During the open comment period, thousands of public comments were received by DOT in support of lowering the intensity (or advocating the complete elimination of DRLs from U.S. roads). Automaker sentiment generally ran along predictable lines, with European automakers experienced at complying with European DRL requirements voicing no objection to the proposal, and North American automakers vociferously repeating the same objections they raised in response to Canada's initial proposal.[16][17] The DOT proposal for DRL intensity reduction was rescinded in 2004.[
__________________
|
07-01-2009, 03:48 PM | #56 |
Drives: 69 Z28 Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Compound
Posts: 11
|
Exactly, though I've seen some driving at night with parking lights only, (just rings). Cool but unsafe.
Last edited by cobra; 07-01-2009 at 10:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|