10-20-2013, 01:01 PM | #43 |
Drives: 09 a4 1500 silverado 2010 2ss rs Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: fort wayne
Posts: 309
|
Idk about you guys but I personally like the looks of the later supras. Very nice cars!!
|
10-20-2013, 01:07 PM | #44 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 98
|
if he is truly single turbo and engine is in decent shape, then you will have some trouble. Really depends what turbo he has on there, 430 is low for a single setup. It will prob take down a 1LE in a straight line, but I think it will be close with a ZL1 as they are several hundred pounds lighter.
__________________
2013 L99
bolt ons, tune |
10-20-2013, 01:56 PM | #45 |
|
__________________
|
10-20-2013, 06:51 PM | #46 | |
Emerald Coast Camaro's
Drives: 2014 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: P.C.B. Florida
Posts: 815
|
I wouldn't take these cars lightly...they are fast. I use to race them with my twin turbo z's back in the 90's...alot of 10 sec cars
|
|
10-20-2013, 07:02 PM | #47 |
Drives: 12 MP4-12C, 16 Quattroporte Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Working
Posts: 707
|
If it is a 93+ supra and it's single turbo, then it is probably very fast and he may be underrating the power it is making. The only way he isn't underestimating it is if it was a non-turbo that he bolted a turbo onto. The twin-turbo 93+ supras make 400rwhp with bolt ons no problem and with a single turbo swap they usually easily break 500rwhp. An old neighbor of mine had a single turbo 95 supra on a stock engine that made just under 800rwhp and absolutely murdered my z06 from any speed. Supras are and always will be dangerous highway hunters. Pick 10 4th gen turbo supras at random and half of them will trap over 130mph. Which body style is it OP?
Some of you are coming off as very misinformed and arrogant. |
10-20-2013, 07:46 PM | #48 |
|
It's a stock displacement block single turbo
__________________
|
10-20-2013, 07:47 PM | #49 |
|
He won't answer me on what year it is. I believe 95
__________________
|
10-20-2013, 08:57 PM | #50 |
Drives: 12 MP4-12C, 16 Quattroporte Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Working
Posts: 707
|
Was it twin turbo stock or not turbo at all? I guess if he's not telling you the year then you won't get that info out of him. There's no such thing as a stock single turbo Supra from 93+. If it was a non-turbo converted to single turbo those numbers sound about right. If it was a stock twin-turbo converted to single, he is probably low balling. Like I said, stock twins with basic upgrades will make around 400rwhp. Most single turbo converted cars make at least 500rwhp+. Those blocks are super stout from the factory.
|
10-20-2013, 10:02 PM | #51 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10-20-2013, 10:56 PM | #52 |
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 1998 Cobra Join Date: May 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 278
|
Gotta watch the raggedy sleepers...had one walk away from me in my GT. And my GT is faster than your stock 1LE will be. The single turbo will be much faster than the stock twins. Take him to the track and let it ride
|
10-21-2013, 04:33 PM | #53 | |
Loving My LS3
|
Quote:
|
|
10-21-2013, 04:46 PM | #54 |
Drives: Camaro Lighting Experts Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,429
|
You consider this an ugly car?
To each their own, but I'd take a Supra any day of the week. With a nicely built 2jzgte you can make high hp while still being reliable at moderate boost Post of a video of the race Nick C.
__________________
|
10-21-2013, 05:04 PM | #55 | |
|
Quote:
Thats professionally built. His car is ugly. That one is done right.
__________________
|
|
10-21-2013, 05:10 PM | #56 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|