520 HP L99 VS 330 HP Turbo Acura RSX 96

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by Nessal

Where do you get your facts from? When in the world is a RSX 2400-2500lbs? As tested by Car and Driver, the RSX is 2808lbs. You're looking at close to 3000lbs with a driver. Add a turbo kit and you are well into the 3000lb range.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...pe-s-road-test

That's assuming that you are talking about the RSX as it's the Integra in Asia.


Btw, I just did some checking and even the 3rd gen Integras are not 2400-2500lbs. It's 2600lbs...add a turbo kit and you're close to 2700. And that is without a driver.

Title says 96, only acura that might have came to mind is the ingetra @ 2400-2500lbs either way at the track the camaro takes it. From a highway roll the acura takes the win there's 400rwhp hondas out there schooling 600 700hp vettes.

[Nessal]

Originally Posted by 62nalide

Title says 96, only acura that might have came to mind is the ingetra @ 2400-2500lbs either way at the track the camaro takes it. From a highway roll the acura takes the win there's 400rwhp hondas out there schooling 600 700hp vettes.

I believe a 1996 Integra is the 3rd gen so they are still not 2400-2500lbs. They are closer to 2700lbs if forced induction is added.

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by Nessal

I believe a 1996 Integra is the 3rd gen so they are still not 2400-2500lbs. They are closer to 2700lbs if forced induction is added.

My buddies weigh in at 2611lbs with his turbo system add 135lbs on the driver 2745lbs, with weight reduction so you might be right

[blk13SS]

Integra is MUCH lighter, with a proper powerband, the Teggy should get the win, but it will be close.

[1985airborne]

My brother ran the quarter mile in 14.4 sec @ 111 MPH, Now does he have a to beat me?

[DarkneSS]

Originally Posted by 1985airborne

My brother ran the quarter mile in 14.4 sec @ 111 MPH, Now does he have a to beat me?

That trap means its a low 12s car, a roll should be interesting but my money is on you. I ran a 370 whp 12' SI, PM me for details.

[DRKnight1SS]

I used to drive a toy car (a 2003 Acura RSX-S) before I grew up and got a real car. You would easily beat your brother by at least a car length.

[CyberPredator]

Camaro has the power to weight advantage ~8.1 integra to ~7.4 camaro. You should beat him with little issue. Probably beat him by 2-3 cars from a roll if you put it in the right gear.

[1985airborne]

Just to update you all!!! I wore his ass out! By a bus length...He didnt miss a shift either so no excuses. It was no point to even race him...After that he left the track!

[blk13SS]

Lol greay job

[2012 Mustang GT]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

That trap means its a low 12s car, a roll should be interesting but my money is on you. I ran a 370 whp 12' SI, PM me for details.

Low 12's???? very doubtful on 111mph trap

[Sugarfree135]

Originally Posted by 1985airborne

Just to update you all!!! I wore his ass out! By a bus length...He didnt miss a shift either so no excuses. It was no point to even race him...After that he left the track!

Way to go man 😀 I was going to say if he ran a 14.4 (at around sea level) you should have killed him lol my car runs 14 flat with a horrible 60ft at 4800 ft above sea level! 😜 I have to agree with the previous poster fwd is one of the worst drag platforms, I have a friend with a 2006 civic si that's boosted at around 450whp that will beat zo6's on a highway run but I could beat him on a legit 1/4 mile because he can't get a good launch or traction through the first 3 gears.

[08-G35s/6MT]

Originally Posted by 2012 Mustang GT

Low 12's???? very doubtful on 111mph trap

With stalled auto and slicks and skinnies 11.9 is even possible with good setup and 111 trap.

[2012 Mustang GT]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

With stalled auto and slicks and skinnies 11.9 is even possible with good setup and 111 trap.

He was talking about the turbo acura that ran a 14.4 @ 111. He's not going to run 12's or 11's