You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
06-13-2012, 10:35 PM
|
#15 |
 
Drives: 2010 CGM 2LT RS A6 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 133
|
Tracy has me sold on moving forward with CNC throttle body, Black-Iceolator (3/8") and I might as well jump on the RX polished ported IM, which looks bad a$$. Then I guess I'll need the Trifecta. Can't think of anything else after this, I'll be broke anyway lol
__________________
IO Int, 20" polished, Rx catch can, RX breather, CAI Inc, VMax TB, MRT V2
Future Mods: 3/8" Black Ice-olator, Trifecta Tune  |
|
|
|
06-24-2012, 08:12 PM
|
#16 |
|
Founder - Michigan FBody
Drives: 1994 Camaro LT1, 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Haven, MI
Posts: 2,599
|
My 2012 LFX was on the dyno yesterday and made 270hp/232tq and the only mod is a CAI Inc cold air intake. My air fuel ratio was lean until it hit 6500rpms or so. Here's the dyno graph. Granted, this is just a tailpipe sniffer.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 - "Zooma"
1994 Camaro LT1 A4 - "Red Alert" - v6-to-LT1 Swapped Cruiser; Cammed, Stalled, Enjoyed "Gone But Not Forgotten" 2016 Camaro 1LT A8 - "Elmo" 2014 Camaro 1LT M6 - "Cherry Bomb" 2012 Camaro 1LS M6 - "Clifford" Michigan FBody Association http://www.mifbody.com/ |
|
|
|
|
06-24-2012, 08:24 PM
|
#17 |
            
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Not bad numbers meissen, seems to be better than many LLTs with just a CAI anyways.. I wish we really knew what the drivetrain loss on the manuals were. 323 HP with a 15% loss is 274 HP so if the loss is really 15% then it doesn't appear to be much of a peak gain, but if the loss is more than it is definitely a gain.
I'm sure it picked up numbers in the middle rpm as that seems to be the sweet spot for gains.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
06-24-2012, 08:46 PM
|
#18 |
Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
|
There are many differences between the 87 and 93 octane. Between my original dyno and last dyno was a good difference. The difference between a tank of 87 and 93 is going to cost you $4.00 more than normal to make your car run great. The benefits are in the long run. At the track I would stick 110 in the tank also and it ran fine. Hope this helps alittle.
__________________
 STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87 6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK) |
|
|
|
|
06-24-2012, 08:51 PM
|
#19 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 365
 |
DI engines run best around 13-13.5:1 na. It wasnt lean. 270 is a good number
|
|
|
|
|
06-25-2012, 06:34 AM
|
#20 | |
|
Founder - Michigan FBody
Drives: 1994 Camaro LT1, 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Haven, MI
Posts: 2,599
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 - "Zooma"
1994 Camaro LT1 A4 - "Red Alert" - v6-to-LT1 Swapped Cruiser; Cammed, Stalled, Enjoyed "Gone But Not Forgotten" 2016 Camaro 1LT A8 - "Elmo" 2014 Camaro 1LT M6 - "Cherry Bomb" 2012 Camaro 1LS M6 - "Clifford" Michigan FBody Association http://www.mifbody.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
