Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2010, 04:36 PM   #1
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
22's and acceleration

Finding some mixed opinions on search etc.

If a given 22 inch wheel/tire is a couple pounds lighter than the stock 20 inch wheel and tire while also having the same tire height, (315/25/22 is actually a bit shorter for a tad better gearing) how could this possibly hurt acceleration?

same height )slightly shorter), less weight...not understanding I guess.

I could see a wider tire causing more friction against the road because of more surface area...but I would think the weight would make up for such a small detail/it would be barely noticeable. and this would apply to any rim and tire combo that is wider and not just on a 22.

anyone have a solid educated answer?

anyone installed lightweight 22 inch rim/tire options and have a SOTP difference or maybe even tested it out?

I am debating 22's...but will not do it if it is going to be costly in the accel department.

thanks, Troy
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 04:59 PM   #2
Nine Ball


 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
anyone have a solid educated answer?
Yes.

I'm a mechanical engineer, so I can explain this perfectly for you.

It isn't simply about total static weight. While that may be a factor, it is more about Moment Of Inertia. MOI is dependent on that static weight, but also the relative distance from the center of the wheel, to the location where most of that weight is. The further from the center that the weight is situated on a spinning object, the more effort it takes to spin or accelerate the object.

Generally, a 22" wheel will have a greater distance from center where its weight is situated, compared with a 20" wheel. Even if both wheels weigh exactly the same amount, it is likely the 22" wheel will take more effort to accelerate (and decelerate).

Think of a figure skater on ice. When they have their leg sticking out, they turn very slowly. When they bring their leg in closer, and stand straight up, they spin very fast. Even though both cases, the weigh the same amount.

The best performance will be found with lower diameter wheels, which have more of their weight centered around the hub area, not the outer lip area. The worst performance wheels will usually be the heavier cast aluminum wheels, since they have thicker hoops than a forged wheel does. Cast wheels also have thicker spokes, since their material cannot handle the stresses as well as a forged wheel does. This is the main reason that forged wheels are better for performance.

Hope that helps

Tony
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
Nine Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 05:24 PM   #3
rolnslo
Rolling along...
 
rolnslo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
Yes.

I'm a mechanical engineer, so I can explain this perfectly for you.

It isn't simply about total static weight. While that may be a factor, it is more about Moment Of Inertia. MOI is dependent on that static weight, but also the relative distance from the center of the wheel, to the location where most of that weight is. The further from the center that the weight is situated on a spinning object, the more effort it takes to spin or accelerate the object.

Generally, a 22" wheel will have a greater distance from center where its weight is situated, compared with a 20" wheel. Even if both wheels weigh exactly the same amount, it is likely the 22" wheel will take more effort to accelerate (and decelerate).

Think of a figure skater on ice. When they have their leg sticking out, they turn very slowly. When they bring their leg in closer, and stand straight up, they spin very fast. Even though both cases, the weigh the same amount.

The best performance will be found with lower diameter wheels, which have more of their weight centered around the hub area, not the outer lip area. The worst performance wheels will usually be the heavier cast aluminum wheels, since they have thicker hoops than a forged wheel does. Cast wheels also have thicker spokes, since their material cannot handle the stresses as well as a forged wheel does. This is the main reason that forged wheels are better for performance.

Hope that helps

Tony
Showoff!


I was digging deep into my brain to remember the correct terminology from college physics but kept coming up with "Law of conservation of angular momentum". MOI is what I was looking for.
__________________
rolnslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 06:25 PM   #4
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
Yes.

I'm a mechanical engineer, so I can explain this perfectly for you.

It isn't simply about total static weight. While that may be a factor, it is more about Moment Of Inertia. MOI is dependent on that static weight, but also the relative distance from the center of the wheel, to the location where most of that weight is. The further from the center that the weight is situated on a spinning object, the more effort it takes to spin or accelerate the object.

Generally, a 22" wheel will have a greater distance from center where its weight is situated, compared with a 20" wheel. Even if both wheels weigh exactly the same amount, it is likely the 22" wheel will take more effort to accelerate (and decelerate).

Think of a figure skater on ice. When they have their leg sticking out, they turn very slowly. When they bring their leg in closer, and stand straight up, they spin very fast. Even though both cases, the weigh the same amount.

The best performance will be found with lower diameter wheels, which have more of their weight centered around the hub area, not the outer lip area. The worst performance wheels will usually be the heavier cast aluminum wheels, since they have thicker hoops than a forged wheel does. Cast wheels also have thicker spokes, since their material cannot handle the stresses as well as a forged wheel does. This is the main reason that forged wheels are better for performance.

Hope that helps

Tony
I was thinking/came up with something similar to that in my head but did not think it would matter a whole lot because the rim is actually lighter than the tires. But now that I think about it most of the weight of the rim is at the outsdie and very far from center.

The weight of a 275/45/20 pirelli pzero is 36 lbs. The pzero nero in 315/25/22 is 33 lbs. The stock 20 inch wheel will have some extra weight away from the center (the furthest point) that the 22 inch wheel does not.

Given most of the weight of the rim is at the outside, I see what you are saying...but wouldnt the lighter tires offset this somewhat? And given the 22's are a few pounds lighter yet...how much more would this offset the moment of inertia?

Damnit I want 22's...I wish I knew for sure how much it mattered in this type of situation. If it was only a tenth or two I could probably live with it.

You could probably formulate a complex equation using the different distances from center and the weight of the tires/rims and the weight distribution of the different rims and figure it out if you are bored LOL.

Last edited by ULTRAZLS1; 12-16-2010 at 06:37 PM.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 06:47 PM   #5
Nine Ball


 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
Tire weight is mostly in the tread, due to the steel belting. So, they sort of wash each other out if their outer diameter and widths are the same. The sidewalls have very little weight in them compared to the tread/belted area.

Honestly, it isn't a huge amount of performance difference if we are comparing identical wheels in just different sizing. I'd estimate 1-2 tenths at the dragstrip, if you could hook on either. If the car is mostly your weekend hotrod or showcar, go with 22s. If you are the type that wants to squeeze every ounce of performance out, simply get a set of dedicated track wheels/tires for those occasional visits.
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
Nine Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 12:30 AM   #6
MAYRO35
 
Drives: 2000 Caddy Deville
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 54
wld spacers for stock 20's have a decrease in acceleration?
MAYRO35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 09:40 AM   #7
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,716
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
Yes.

I'm a mechanical engineer, so I can explain this perfectly for you.

It isn't simply about total static weight. While that may be a factor, it is more about Moment Of Inertia. MOI is dependent on that static weight, but also the relative distance from the center of the wheel, to the location where most of that weight is. The further from the center that the weight is situated on a spinning object, the more effort it takes to spin or accelerate the object.

Generally, a 22" wheel will have a greater distance from center where its weight is situated, compared with a 20" wheel. Even if both wheels weigh exactly the same amount, it is likely the 22" wheel will take more effort to accelerate (and decelerate).

Think of a figure skater on ice. When they have their leg sticking out, they turn very slowly. When they bring their leg in closer, and stand straight up, they spin very fast. Even though both cases, the weigh the same amount.

The best performance will be found with lower diameter wheels, which have more of their weight centered around the hub area, not the outer lip area. The worst performance wheels will usually be the heavier cast aluminum wheels, since they have thicker hoops than a forged wheel does. Cast wheels also have thicker spokes, since their material cannot handle the stresses as well as a forged wheel does. This is the main reason that forged wheels are better for performance.

Hope that helps

Tony
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolnslo View Post
Showoff!


I was digging deep into my brain to remember the correct terminology from college physics but kept coming up with "Law of conservation of angular momentum". MOI is what I was looking for.
Name:  26.gif
Views: 554
Size:  1.9 KBNerds. lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
Tire weight is mostly in the tread, due to the steel belting. So, they sort of wash each other out if their outer diameter and widths are the same. The sidewalls have very little weight in them compared to the tread/belted area.

Honestly, it isn't a huge amount of performance difference if we are comparing identical wheels in just different sizing. I'd estimate 1-2 tenths at the dragstrip, if you could hook on either. If the car is mostly your weekend hotrod or showcar, go with 22s. If you are the type that wants to squeeze every ounce of performance out, simply get a set of dedicated track wheels/tires for those occasional visits.
I'd say .2 is acurate. I lost over a tenth going from 21s to 22s. My 22s are wider as you know, but still.
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 12:44 PM   #8
Darth_Emma
Psssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhh!
 
Darth_Emma's Avatar
 
Drives: under contruction
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville, Ohio
Posts: 12,996
I know what Nine Ball says as far as physics go is correct. But, isn't it also true that on a smaller rim, the sidewall of the tire is thicker to make a wheel diameter that is the equivalent of a larger rimmed wheel. I would think the thicker sidewall on the smaller diameter rim (say 18" rim) would give a bit more and, therefore, produce more traction, whereas a wheel with less sidewall (on say a 22" rim) would not flex as much which would not allow the tire to grab the road as well.
Darth_Emma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 01:03 PM   #9
Dr Jkel
and MR. HYDE
 
Drives: 2010 2SS RJT/BLK 6Spd Man
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posts: 4,375
Put enough HP behind it , won't matter, LOL
Dr Jkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 01:10 PM   #10
Dangeruss
Bayoucitymusclecars.com
 
Dangeruss's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro LSX
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 4,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Jkel View Post
Put enough HP behind it , won't matter, LOL
That was my answer!
Dangeruss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 01:29 PM   #11
Dr Jkel
and MR. HYDE
 
Drives: 2010 2SS RJT/BLK 6Spd Man
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posts: 4,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangeruss View Post
That was my answer!
Yeah we noticed, now I'm scared. You car just sounds sick, I can only imagine how it runs.
Dr Jkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 06:26 PM   #12
Hendrix-Engineering
Account Suspended
 
Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 1,835
my results

On my 2003 harley suppercrew I switched out my stock 20 inch harley wheels to the aftermarket 22s with the same desighn,they were a lil lighter and picked up a tenth over my best pass with the 20s and this was my first run on the 22s...I have the 22 rep wheels on my 2010 sixspeed with 490 rwhp.i never ran the car with the 20s but my first time at the track with the 22s i cut a 1.88 sixty and a 1.91 sixty and ran a 12.05 and a 12.09....
Hendrix-Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 07:50 PM   #13
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
I know it seems like a small amount.

But...I have a friend with a modded ls1 4th gen that I can literally just barely edge out by a car or two every time we run. If I go 22's I bet I will lose...it is that close LOL.

It is a tough call...some of the rims I want look AMAZING in 22 inch format and I am just scared I will be disappointed if I get them in 20's....but then 20 inch forged will definitely get some extra performance.....
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 09:06 PM   #14
600hp-lpe


 
Drives: 2010
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 4,788
When I went from the stock 20's to a 19X10 on all 4 corners, I lost 47 lbs in weight off the tires..

My 18" set for the track lost even more weight (I forget how much more). I think it was another 20 lbs from the 19's, but the tires were MUCH wider. (315 on the front, 335 on the rear).

Both sets are a dramatic difference from stock as the diameter is smaller.

Stock diameter is 28.2"
19" diameter measured at 26.8" (11.4 wide)
18" diameter measured at 25.6" (13.2 wide)

Your first ride on a 19" from the 20's and you would not believe you are driving the same car.. it's faster, turn in is quicker, and stops better.

Tire preference is different for everyone.
600hp-lpe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.