|
View Poll Results: Would you pay for a dealer installed performance upgrade that carried a warranty? | |||
Yes, I plan on modding and would like a warranty | 177 | 89.85% | |
I plan on modding on my own, and would not care | 15 | 7.61% | |
No thanks | 5 | 2.54% | |
Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
07-28-2012, 04:12 PM | #43 |
Summit White 2012 ZL1 M6
Drives: 2010 BLACK 2SS/RS M6 Delvd 8/24/9 Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Elkmont, Alabama
Posts: 435
|
__________________
2012 Summit White ZL1 Manual 6sp Blk 10 spoke, "Thanks Champion Chevrolet" delivered 6/9/2012 #1588
|
07-28-2012, 04:30 PM | #44 |
Account Suspended
Drives: xxx Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: xxx
Posts: 389
|
I think almost 100% would do the factory upgrade with warranty, not sure why only a 10% number is estimated?
Great car no doubt. Still better with a factory upgrade. Like to see GM do something for pride not just bottom line anyway. Say what you will, the 13 Shelby was sand kicked in the face with no reply so far. Rationalize however makes you feel better. I want a factory warranteed upgrade. |
07-28-2012, 05:12 PM | #45 | |
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
|
Quote:
That's the fallacy of this whole thing with the camaro not being able to chase after the mustang......its own brother the 'vette. Unfortunately, this could be the linchpin that will keep the camaro from being a serious contender to the gt500. My argument is that the camaro has to fight...compete... since it entered the ring with the gt500. Because the gt500 armed itself to do battle, it seems that some folks (even some in gm's camp) are content to feel that the camaro can't or won't compete. Handling is a great thing, but the ZL1 promised to be an all around competitor. So far its having its issues with dealing with the GT500 in terms of acceleration. Good thing you mentioned that 'Had they known Ford was going to choose to make such a radical jump and completely reclass the GT500 then of course GM would've followed suit with the ZL1.' (my apologies for cut and pasting). This is another issue that annoys me. GM-Chevy should have known or anticipated that this was going to be a dog-fight. GM should have made provisions for modifications and improvement in the event that ford would retaliate. It appears that GM had no idea of how aggressive ford would become in this battle. My point...to sum it up...is that its too late for excuses, 'top dog card clauses', bottom line rationalizing, etc. If you're in the ring, then you either fight or go home.
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic '15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo '14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic |
|
07-28-2012, 05:35 PM | #46 | |
Drives: 2010 Duramax; 2012 CTS-V Coupe Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2012, 05:39 PM | #47 | |
Drives: 2010 Duramax; 2012 CTS-V Coupe Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2012, 05:42 PM | #48 |
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
|
Well.........look on the bright side. At least we have our pick on which high-powered car to choose from. We couldn't necessarily say that a decade and a half ago. Even ten years ago 300+ factory hp was considered good.
I just don't like compromises in a car fight. Eh....we'll live lol!
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic '15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo '14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic |
07-28-2012, 05:50 PM | #49 | |
Drives: 2010 Duramax; 2012 CTS-V Coupe Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2012, 06:24 PM | #50 |
Drives: . Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 49
|
|
07-28-2012, 08:34 PM | #51 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro (M6) 1000+ HP SBE Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,391
|
Come on GM let's see a 417 Stroker, GT-9 cam, and 2.9L Whipple on the 2014 ZL1. Add an extra 10K to the price . . . I would be in. Oh yeah, and you would blow the GT-500 out of the water with this setup.
|
07-28-2012, 09:05 PM | #52 |
Drives: '04 Cobra Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Summerfield,NC
Posts: 100
|
A lot of you are wishful thinkers and I guess we all are in a sense since these long wars won't be around forever( maybe not even a few more years). With that said, a feasible staged package could consist of CAI/tuner and a CAI/pulley/tuner upgrade. Exhaust is optional. Besides that as some have said the timing is horrible and it wouldn't make sense to have huge power packages when the car will be changed( possibly an entirely different car/power train) in a couple years. We have no idea what either company will offer on their next platforms but I'm positive ford isnt pitting their top dog against the number 2 or 3 in Chevys lineup. As a matter of fact, they were never focused I the camaro when building the gt500 and it's almost a garantee they'll be focused on the c7 zo6 and not the camaro in any version. As many of you stated, where your screwed is your hp limited from the factory because you aren't the top dog. If you were then things would be different. I'd still be optimistic that Chevy will do something as I'm sure they've seen how upset some people are in the straight line performance comparison of said cars. Honestly speaking, the magnetic ride suspension is absolutely fantastic and the gt500 shouldn't be as close and in some instances winning in any of the road course battles. Chevy better do something because I'm loving the pony wars!
|
07-28-2012, 09:25 PM | #53 |
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
|
|
07-28-2012, 09:45 PM | #54 |
Shark attack!
|
Okay so let me get this straight reviews state the ZL1 is the better car, and yet because the mustang is more powerful we lose? Last I checked the ZL1 can compete pretty darn well with all the cars in its class as it was designed to do, GM played their cards right because at this point the ball is in GMs Court and if they let mustang be a temporary top dog then we will see a similar event happen as when the 2010 Camaros came out. Their power and performance was rare even in the v6. Next Gen will be dominated by us once again, watch MRS funnel down into more of GMs vehicles and see what kind of weight and power we will be dealing with. If we manage to get 20-30 more hp from the new engines as well as a track ready performance all while being lighter then why complain?
__________________
|
07-28-2012, 10:01 PM | #55 |
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
|
This is the best poll I have seen in along time IMHO. Note to GM: Can we please get a factory stage 2 upgrade with a warranty that the LSA so obviously needs. The ZL1 needs nothing else.
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
|
07-28-2012, 10:49 PM | #56 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: xxx Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: xxx
Posts: 389
|
Quote:
You miss my point, and end up supporting my argument without even realizing it. I think your estimates of ZL1 owners that will "mod" their ZL1s is about right if said mods void their warranty. this thread is about the desire for manufacturer approved "upgrades" that would leave the warranty intact. My point is that most all ZL1 owners would go for that "upgrade". I puposely diffentiate the "upgrade" from a "mod" here ONLY to make the point that ZL1 owners (I am one, are you?) would also write the check to add one more "after purchase option" to gain more warrantied horsepower. If that is merely a CAI, a pulley, and a tune that when done by GM maintains the warranty, we are likely all in (those that would mod anyway plus those that wouldn't otherwise because loss of warranty. If you were to buy the same exact parts and do it yourself or have a tuner do it, but void the warranty, most will not. Chevy chose to play a "political game" too, they lost. Ford trumped them with the 650 HP GT500 at the very announcement of the vert. I think you either enter the ring, or stay home. We are in the ring already, so why not keep swinging? The judges scorecards all have a decision for ZL1, but why not still just knock the Shelby out? I know I am very disappointed that the CTS-V will take me in the quarter, I am more disappointed at the gap the Shelby will take me by. This just simply should not be. ADD HP AS A WARRANTIED AFTER PURCHASE OPTION. In the end, we are saying the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|