You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
02-15-2014, 03:44 PM
|
#1 |
 Drives: Silver 2013 2LT Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 8
|
My 2013 v6 1lt vs 1995 z28 camaro STOCK
Stock for stock against my coworker 1995, from a dig & a roll... Would this be a good race?
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 03:46 PM
|
#2 |
 
Drives: 1973 z28 Rs , 2012 SS/Rs Blk/Blk M6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laguna
Posts: 197
|
The lt1 is pretty strong.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 03:54 PM
|
#3 |
|
Drives: Silver 2013 2LT Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 8
|
So u think my v6 would take it?
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 04:08 PM
|
#4 |
          
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Depends on what gears he has if he has them granny 2.90 gears you'd take it
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 04:15 PM
|
#5 |
|
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
According to Dragtimes.com a 95 Z28 stock has posted a time of 13.86 @ 99.26
The best we have posted here on Camaro5 in the drag racing thread is 13.955 @ 100.77. It will come down to who cuts the best light and traction at the start. can it be done, yes, will it be easy, probably not.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 04:24 PM
|
#6 |
|
I'm your huckleberry...
Drives: '10 2SS/RS, '88 IROC vert Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 548
|
Stock for stock he will get you. An LT1 was a 14-flat car. A 1LT is not. They don't have as much juice from a roll as the top end is not as good as an LS motor, but they are a lot lighter. Could be slower if he's running an auto with 2.73s...
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news!
__________________
'88 IROC-Z vert (14.9 @ 92.3) //
'10 2SS/RS LS3 - 423 RWHP, 418 RWTQ  |
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 04:28 PM
|
#7 | |
Drives: 2014 Black 1SS A6 Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cameron, NC
Posts: 659
 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 05:00 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
It should be a equally match race then
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 05:01 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Drives: Silver 2013 2LT Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 06:56 PM
|
#10 |
Drives: black Z28 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: el mirage
Posts: 1,323
|
He will get you.
__________________
My family
1994 Z28 (mine) 2015 Camaro (wife's) 2015 Silverado (mine!) 54 Belair (wife's) 2004 silverado (daughters) |
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 07:32 PM
|
#11 |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
no he won't lt1's are slow turds. Local guy ran 13.9 @ 100 with full exhaust, stall, cam, intake on street tires. They may have run some of those times brand new, but this is 2014 not 1994 all of them are ~20 years old!
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 08:29 PM
|
#12 |
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
I owned both a 94 auto granny gear that ran 14.3 on a summer day. Only made 3 passes in that car ever, then my 97 m6 that I ran about 6 times. That car pulled 13.7s with a cold air, TB, and a cutout. Was my first m6 car and my driving was pretty bad. If your racing a granny gear auto car it's a drivers race! My friends 95 auto runs high 13s but he has shorty headers and intake.
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
 |
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 08:39 PM
|
#13 |
|
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
That 95 has 170k miles on it and still runs those times!
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2014, 10:54 PM
|
#14 |
|
I'm your huckleberry...
Drives: '10 2SS/RS, '88 IROC vert Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 548
|
Just because you've seen a busted LT1 with a bad opti run slow times doesn't mean they're all turds. With 100k on the clock, an intake and some flows I ran a 13.9 (bald tires, too).
OP, the auto had either 2.73 or 3.23 gears. From a dig is probably your best bet because they are torquey and he may spin. Good luck, though!
__________________
'88 IROC-Z vert (14.9 @ 92.3) //
'10 2SS/RS LS3 - 423 RWHP, 418 RWTQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
