Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Suspension / Brakes / Chassis


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2012, 06:30 PM   #1
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
2013 Strut Mount Changes

2013 Strut Mount Changes

The front strut mount has been changed slightly for 2013. The change appears to be a simplification of the manufacturing process. Watch this video for the details.



There is no change of substance in terms of function from the older mount to the new mount. The upper coil eye dimension has not been changed. Pedders lowering coils are still a perfect fit to the steel an urethane insulator. You can count on Pedders to bring you the most up-to-date information for your 5th Gen Camaro.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:11 PM   #2
L99CAMA2011


 
L99CAMA2011's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 4,177
Nice , so they did this to cut cost, lets hope is has no durability issues especially with more harsh suspension struts. Great. :(
L99CAMA2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:19 PM   #3
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by L99CAMA2011 View Post
Nice , so they did this to cut cost, lets hope is has no durability issues especially with more harsh suspension struts. Great. :(
I see no reason to be concerned about durability, harshness or any another performance measure. In my book, the less parts you have, the less there is to go wrong. That is why we determined to discard the insulator for coilover installations. Personally I discard the insulator for lowering coil installations. Harshness and noise have not been an issue.

The biggest issue for us at Pedders is for the next few weeks we'll have to find old style mounts for coilover installations while we wait for expedited to aluminum adapter rings for our coilovers.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:30 PM   #4
L99CAMA2011


 
L99CAMA2011's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 4,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
I see no reason to be concerned about durability, harshness or any another performance measure. In my book, the less parts you have, the less there is to go wrong. That is why we determined to discard the insulator for coilover installations. Personally I discard the insulator for lowering coil installations. Harshness and noise have not been an issue.

The biggest issue for us at Pedders is for the next few weeks we'll have to find old style mounts for coilover installations while we wait for expedited to aluminum adapter rings for our coilovers.
Ok so the new piece is still going to be as strong.
L99CAMA2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 09:43 PM   #5
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by L99CAMA2011 View Post
Ok so the new piece is still going to be as strong.
From my perspective, absolutely. They deleted the gray plastic perch in favor of the wider flatter steel base of the urethane insulator. It should be as strong if not stronger based on how the load is distributed.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.