03-17-2013, 02:21 PM | #589 |
Drives: 2010 RS Inferno Orange Metallic Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Albany, Ga.
Posts: 3,398
|
Does not look like a whole lot of diff from Trifectia, except price. This really looks more like it. 13 - 17 Hp increase, I would feel safe with that. 35 Hp over stock just did not sound right to me.
(Disclaimer): trying to remember numbers I could be wrong.
__________________
PCP Hideaway Headlight Covers, BBK Headers & High Flow Cats, ZL1 Add-ons Wicker Bill, TL1/ZL1 Hood Insert, Gen5 DIY Frameless Mirror, ABL Dash Lighting an My link Navigation, Blacked out Rear Bowtie, all Sylvania led Turn Signals, Ceramic Window Tint By Nicks, MBRP Exhaust tips, GEN5 DIY Virginia Legal DRL Harness, Painted Brake Calipers, Vittesse Throttle Controller, Heritage Grill, Diode Dynamics Led Lighting, Manual Shifter Boot, Paddle Shifters, CNC Throttle Body, Trifecta Tune, RX Catch Can & Breather, Trunk Black out and Side Grills, Chevorlet door Sills.
|
03-17-2013, 02:25 PM | #590 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 2,610
|
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2013, 02:33 PM | #591 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
|
Quote:
I was told on that particular run, the stock tune ran as well as the Trifecta run. Now....putting on my flame suit. This will just never be settled until we can get a true back to back run of stock versus Trifecta versus IPF in a semi controlled environment.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
03-17-2013, 02:35 PM | #592 |
|
All I'm saying is on your back to back stock vs IPF runs, you're showing about 15-17rwhp gains. Trifecta has pretty consistently dynoed around 13-15 over stock, if I'm recalling correctly.
So what I don't get is when you did the other guys car, Trifecta, IPF and then SC, how you got it to show 15 over Trifecta. I think your last test kind of made us all a little leery with the numbers but this one shows you're coming back down to earth. Looks like we have two fairly similar, but both good, tuning options. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
__________________
[B]
|
03-17-2013, 02:36 PM | #593 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,941
|
In Matt's defense...the other results on Ventmaster's car wasn't his test. It was at the IPF facility in Arizona I believe.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
03-17-2013, 02:41 PM | #594 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 2,610
|
Quote:
Past that, this is our results shown back to back over stock. You can let the other guys go through the drama of who is the best. Give me the tools to show the tests and I'll be glad to do so. Obviously like I said GMHTP Magazine thought I was competent enough to do these tests years ago, so I'd have no problem performing the same style test again. |
|
03-17-2013, 02:53 PM | #595 | |
|
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
__________________
[B]
|
|
03-17-2013, 03:59 PM | #596 |
Don't Sleep on My V6
|
I think a mail order tune will show less gains than what it would do if the tuners had the cars on their dyno. As they can see and tweak on the fly. Just like Matt can tune in house a LFX to similar to what IPF can get.
__________________
|
03-17-2013, 04:52 PM | #597 | |
Track > 1/4 Mile
|
Quote:
Now with that being said, the IPF tune in my opinion isn't the end all be all tune for the V6.
__________________
|
|
03-17-2013, 05:12 PM | #598 |
Oh no, I think this will just promote some healthy competition between tuners. The Bosch ECU is a b*tch but who knows what someone comes up with.
__________________
El gato. Mods: Eagle eye headlights, 18" Axis Sport graphite, Roto-Fab cold air intake, Vmax ported TB, 3/8" Vmax Black-Ice, RX single valve catch can, RX breather, Pedders inserts, Trifecta tune, BBK LTH 304 SS.
art/ärt/Noun. Definition: 5th generation Camaro. |
|
03-17-2013, 06:35 PM | #599 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 2,610
|
Quote:
And yes I agree with Cant_C_Me on-site is better in most cases, however, we only have some options to choose from. |
|
03-17-2013, 08:39 PM | #600 |
Drives: 2011 RJT 2LT/RS Convertible Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 3,381
|
Never thought I would go with a canned tune. I certainly prefer to have the car on the dyno and trim. However I have had good luck with the IPF tune, obd data, and Arno doesn't sleep !
Just not any other choices locally to get this done on spot. Maybe some day Jannetys will get on the LLT bandwagon
__________________
1st IPF Supercharged 2011 2LT/RS RJT Convertible
|
03-17-2013, 08:59 PM | #601 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro v6 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Barberton, Ohio
Posts: 283
|
Im not going to bash neither company! My own two cents is as follows. I have a trifecta tune on my 2010 camaro LT. I am pleased with it an am looking forward to interacting with trifecta again soon as I get my exhaust work under way. I will say I can tell a difference in shifting and butt dyno. I have no experience with IPF's tuning simply because the price I recieved on my Trifecta was unpassable. If done over Id do trifecta again. My only con to Trifecta is that I bought the cable and etc to tune my vehicle and was never sent a tune to save and load to my computer. I have to go back to BNR site to email them and ask for the tune to be emailed to me. It didnt take long to receieve my tune via email. Also to mention i believe i held onto my trifecta cable a good month before I even bothered to install the tune on my vehicle so the wait was no big deal. Still on the other hand as stated online I was to recieve a tune through email.... I did not.. That is my only issue. Other then that all and all I am pleased. I think this IPF and Trifecta V.s. each other in my own personal opinion has been blown way out of line... This has been drug on way to long. In beginning i was very curious as to which was better. Now I could care less. Its old news in my book. Again please understand this is my own 2 cents here. Please dont consider this as a bashing.
|
05-24-2013, 12:18 PM | #602 |
Drives: 2019 Chevy Equinox Premier AWD Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 1,344
|
Okay, I was pleased with the IPF tune and still am (performance wise). However, IPF's response time has gotten ALOT worse recently and now I cannot get them to respond when I need it. So...I'm not a happy camper at the moment. I need the tuner update to tune out the CEL I keep getting and I am having to rent the tuner module again for the update when they should have taken care of it in the first place when I told them what was going on (before I first tuned the car). This has been going on for more than 4 months...
__________________
2013 AGM 1SS/1LE, NPP, Camera
(1 of 43) |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|