02-17-2013, 11:09 AM | #15 |
Drives: '86 Monte Carlo SS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,119
|
I frequently hit the revlimiter on the Harley I ride. No problems with 24,000 mi on the odo.
|
02-17-2013, 11:10 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
They don't count, those lawnmowers red line at like 4 revs per hour.
Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away. |
02-17-2013, 11:23 AM | #17 |
Account Suspended
Drives: nothing Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,906
|
I love reaching the redline.
|
02-17-2013, 11:29 AM | #18 |
Drives: 2011 camaro ss2 I.O. M6 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 87
|
But the redline is so broad. The rev limiter normally kicks as soon as it redlines at 6k but the tach goes all the way to 9k. So would it really mess up the engine at 6? I hit 6 only once because there were a lot of cars around me which I was paying attention to instead of my tach and noticed it stayed at 6k, then said with a smile- so it does have a rev limiter.
Posted from Camaro5.com App for Android |
02-17-2013, 11:35 AM | #19 | |
Drives: '13 Camaro 2LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
Why I get a thrill of redlining a car? lol, I bought a Camaro, not Prius. I like feeling the power and sound. Puts permagrin on my face, but I have no idea if that is damaging the car or not. I am not planning to keep this car forever, most likely it will be gone before I even hit 50k miles. |
|
02-17-2013, 11:45 AM | #20 |
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
|
If you are running the engine to redline with WOT you are doing more damage to the engine that if you simply drove "normally".
The good thing is that GM already assumes that a number of people will do this on a regular basis and includes many WOT runs on the dyno. So the entire powertrain is engineered to do this a lot more than most people will ever do. What you are doing is creating a load on on the internals. The issue you will have is from fatigue. But essentially this is damage due to stress built up over time. The strength of the internals should be fine meaning the load on the internals should be nowhere near yield which results usually in deformation. This is what happens when we get into the discussions on aftermarket calibrations. The aftermarket tuners remove many of the GM engineered cushion which generally will increase the loads on the internals resulting in additional fatigue damage which depending on the circumstances lead to earlier engine failures. But if you are stock, your engine was designed to take a certain amout of "fun".
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
02-17-2013, 11:50 AM | #21 |
Drives: SRT Yugo GT Super Sport with Manual Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: va
Posts: 1,536
|
Personally I think the V6 has even more to give after the 7k redline. I hit it so quickly like it wants to keep going but it shuts down. My Harley davidson had a redline limiter but there is a computer kit to extend it and have been using it for the last 7 years with now over 33k miles and it runs as good as new. And I dont get that annoying engine cutout.
|
02-17-2013, 12:42 PM | #22 |
|
|
02-17-2013, 01:00 PM | #23 | |
Ed
Drives: 2013 AGM Camaro 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
|
|
02-17-2013, 01:05 PM | #24 | |
Drives: '13 Camaro 2LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
|
|
02-17-2013, 01:19 PM | #25 |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
If you rev it's balls off.... who knows? If you drive it like an old lady, it really should go somewhere between 1 and 3 hundred thousand miles assuming no gross manufacturing defect shows up.
Every graduation of beating in between will flex the expectations from anywhere between 5k miles life expectancy and 350K miles life expectancy. That really is a..... question that truly can not ever be answered. Nobody has a crystal ball. You can treat it like a baby and an internal casting flaw can slowly propagate from the ID of the crank or a rod and go free at any time. There may be no embedded casting defects and you may beat it like a step child for 200k miles. Who could ever be so brazen as to say what the future holds? Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away. |
02-17-2013, 01:29 PM | #26 |
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2ss Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vegas
Posts: 34
|
|
02-17-2013, 01:47 PM | #27 |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
|
02-17-2013, 01:52 PM | #28 | |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
Quote:
109.22 x 8800 = 961136 961136 / 30000 = 32.037 m/s. Damn. My stuff is impressive! Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away. |
|
|
|
|
|