Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2013, 11:09 AM   #15
upflying


 
upflying's Avatar
 
Drives: '86 Monte Carlo SS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,119
I frequently hit the revlimiter on the Harley I ride. No problems with 24,000 mi on the odo.
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:10 AM   #16
Bumblebee2012

 
Bumblebee2012's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
They don't count, those lawnmowers red line at like 4 revs per hour.

Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away.
Bumblebee2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:23 AM   #17
midnighter
Account Suspended
 
Drives: nothing
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,906
I love reaching the redline.
midnighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:29 AM   #18
chaoscamaro
 
chaoscamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 camaro ss2 I.O. M6
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 87
But the redline is so broad. The rev limiter normally kicks as soon as it redlines at 6k but the tach goes all the way to 9k. So would it really mess up the engine at 6? I hit 6 only once because there were a lot of cars around me which I was paying attention to instead of my tach and noticed it stayed at 6k, then said with a smile- so it does have a rev limiter.


Posted from Camaro5.com App for Android
chaoscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:35 AM   #19
DarkneZZ
 
DarkneZZ's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 Camaro 2LT/RS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by stikSS View Post
Why do you get a thrill of redlining the car? It sounds to me you don't know how to time your shifts. These cars redline around 6250... plus its peak power is 5800... so anything after that it starts to fall off anyway.

I just don't get why you would WOT to the redline every chance you get... its only damaging the internals of the motor.

Sent from my Apple sued Galaxy Note 2
I drive in M, and it shifts for me.
Why I get a thrill of redlining a car? lol, I bought a Camaro, not Prius. I like feeling the power and sound. Puts permagrin on my face, but I have no idea if that is damaging the car or not.

I am not planning to keep this car forever, most likely it will be gone before I even hit 50k miles.
DarkneZZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:45 AM   #20
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
If you are running the engine to redline with WOT you are doing more damage to the engine that if you simply drove "normally".

The good thing is that GM already assumes that a number of people will do this on a regular basis and includes many WOT runs on the dyno.

So the entire powertrain is engineered to do this a lot more than most people will ever do.

What you are doing is creating a load on on the internals. The issue you will have is from fatigue. But essentially this is damage due to stress built up over time. The strength of the internals should be fine meaning the load on the internals should be nowhere near yield which results usually in deformation.

This is what happens when we get into the discussions on aftermarket calibrations. The aftermarket tuners remove many of the GM engineered cushion which generally will increase the loads on the internals resulting in additional fatigue damage which depending on the circumstances lead to earlier engine failures.

But if you are stock, your engine was designed to take a certain amout of "fun".
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:50 AM   #21
shrinkdoc

 
Drives: SRT Yugo GT Super Sport with Manual
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: va
Posts: 1,536
Personally I think the V6 has even more to give after the 7k redline. I hit it so quickly like it wants to keep going but it shuts down. My Harley davidson had a redline limiter but there is a computer kit to extend it and have been using it for the last 7 years with now over 33k miles and it runs as good as new. And I dont get that annoying engine cutout.
shrinkdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 12:42 PM   #22
oldfriend


 
Drives: Fiat 500 E
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 32.7607/N. 16.95947/W
Posts: 7,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by upflying View Post
I frequently hit the revlimiter on the Harley I ride. No problems with 24,000 mi on the odo.
On the Harley you ride , is that the same one woth BLUE /red lights that we pay for you to ride and service it .
Good to know that you taking good care of her
oldfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:00 PM   #23
BigBlock69RS
Ed
 
BigBlock69RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 AGM Camaro 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumblebee2012 View Post
My opinion is that you car has a preset number of over revs written on an invisible sign over its head. At that number, a rod comes through the block or a crank fractures. If you want to find out your invisible number sooner, rev it to the moon more often!

Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away.
X2 it's called wear and tear. High revving motors have often greatly reduced lifespans over lower reved motors. When you take into considerstion the angular velocity and weight being moved around at even 6k rpm vs 3k there is no question. However how much time do you spend at 6k vs 3k,? probaly not enough to worry about unless its extreme.
__________________
BigBlock69RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:05 PM   #24
DarkneZZ
 
DarkneZZ's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 Camaro 2LT/RS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBlock69RS View Post
X2 it's called wear and tear. High revving motors have often greatly reduced lifespans over lower reved motors. When you take into considerstion the angular velocity and weight being moved around at even 6k rpm vs 3k there is no question. However how much time do you spend at 6k vs 3k,? probaly not enough to worry about unless its extreme.
If I maintain it and service properly, do you think it will last 100K without major problems?:s
DarkneZZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:19 PM   #25
Bumblebee2012

 
Bumblebee2012's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
If you rev it's balls off.... who knows? If you drive it like an old lady, it really should go somewhere between 1 and 3 hundred thousand miles assuming no gross manufacturing defect shows up.

Every graduation of beating in between will flex the expectations from anywhere between 5k miles life expectancy and 350K miles life expectancy.

That really is a..... question that truly can not ever be answered. Nobody has a crystal ball. You can treat it like a baby and an internal casting flaw can slowly propagate from the ID of the crank or a rod and go free at any time. There may be no embedded casting defects and you may beat it like a step child for 200k miles. Who could ever be so brazen as to say what the future holds?

Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away.
Bumblebee2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:29 PM   #26
Orange Pulp Fiction
 
Orange Pulp Fiction's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2ss
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vegas
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumblebee2012 View Post
Those fools that rev an engine to the moon for attention should be shot in the face.

Orange Pulp Fiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:47 PM   #27
Bumblebee2012

 
Bumblebee2012's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orange Pulp Fiction View Post

Would you prefer... kicked in the nuts? Shooting in the face just seems to get the point across so well. Men just get it. It's never questioned.

Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away.
Bumblebee2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 01:52 PM   #28
Bumblebee2012

 
Bumblebee2012's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by karguy View Post
You can do the math easy;stroke in mm times max rpm divided by 30000
Above 21m/s is considered critical piston speed...
4.3" stroke = 109.22 mm
109.22 x 8800 = 961136
961136 / 30000 = 32.037 m/s.

Damn. My stuff is impressive!

Sent from a Galaxy S3, far....far away.
Bumblebee2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.